Norm and Usage in Contemporary Kazakh: A Linguistic Analysis of Youth Discourse and Digital Communication

Authors

  • Zagira Ordabayeva

    Faculty of Philology, Karaganda University, Karaganda 100024, Kazakhstan

  • Shara Mazhitayeva

    Faculty of Philology, Karaganda University, Karaganda 100024, Kazakhstan

  • Karlygash Khamzina

    Department of Kazakh Language and Culture, Karaganda Technical University, Karaganda 100012, Kazakhstan

  • Togzhan Smakova

    Faculty of Philology, Karaganda University, Karaganda 100024, Kazakhstan

  • Zhanbai Kadyrov

    Faculty of Philology, M. Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University, Petropavlovsk 150003, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11287
Received: 26 July 2025 | Revised: 7 August 2025 | Accepted: 2 September 2025 | Published Online: 22 October 2025

Abstract

This article explores the shifting balance between codified linguistic norms and actual usage patterns in contemporary Kazakh. The main focus is on changes observed in youth colloquial speech and in the rapidly evolving discourse of digital communication. The expansion of social media platforms such as Telegram, Instagram, and WhatsApp has led to the frequent use of non-standard constructions, calques, and hybrid forms. The study demonstrates how these trends are influencing the perception of linguistic correctness, as widespread usage (usus) is increasingly being favored over traditional literary norms. The research is based on a qualitative corpus consisting of social media posts, informal spoken language data, and scholarly opinions on language norms. The methodological foundation includes discourse analysis, comparative syntactic analysis, and contextual-semantic interpretation. The analysis identifies key mechanisms of deviation from the norm, including calquing from Russian, syntactic transfer, non-standard punctuation, abbreviations, and examples of digital slang. The study reveals that in contemporary Kazakh speech, especially among youth, the gap between normative rules and actual linguistic behavior is widening. While traditional grammar is still taught in the educational system, everyday language use increasingly reflects global and media-driven influences. The article frames this shift not merely as a linguistic phenomenon but also as a reflection of deeper sociocultural transformations within individual identity, modern culture, and the digital environment. The findings provide important recommendations for language education, media literacy, and language codification policy. The study underscores the need to reconsider how linguistic norms should be defined, maintained, and taught in the digital age.

Keywords:

Norm; Usag; Kazakh Language; Linguistic Analysis; Youth Discourse; Digital Communication

References

[1] Vinogradov, V.V., 1960. Russian Language: Grammatical Doctrine of the Word. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[2] Ozhogov, S.I., Shvedova, N.Y., 1997. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. Azbukovnik: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[3] Crystal, D., 2011. Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. Routledge: London, UK.

[4] Baron, N.S., 2008. Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[5] Baitursynuly, A., 1914. Language Tool. Qyr balasy baspasy: Orenburg, Russia. (in Kazakh)

[6] Syzdyq, R., 1997. The Power of the Word. Ana tili: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[7] Salkynbai, A., Sarsenbai, Z., 2023. Current Linguistic Trends in Use: Norm and Usus Features. KazNU: Almaty, Kazakhstan. Available from: https://philart.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-FIL/article/view/4223 (in Kazakh)

[8] Qurmanbekova, A., Sarekenova, K., Malikov, K., 2023. About the culture of social media speech. Yassawi habarshysy. 1(27), 167–178. Available from: http://94.141.227.224/index.php/habarshy/article/view/2216 (in Russian)

[9] Kenzhebekova, R., Qaharmanova, A., 2023. Formation of speech skills in primary school through information technology. Izvestya. 2(69), 1–14. Available from: https://bulletin-pedagogical.ablaikhan.kz/index.php/j1/article/view/842 (in Russian)

[10] Qurmanbayuli, A., 2022. Corrective Dictionary. Til-Qazyna: Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[11] Aldash, A., 2021. On the regularities that promote the improvement of spelling standards. Current Scientific Research in the Modern World. 8(1), 24–32.

[12] Sarseke, G.A., 2011. Language culture: Training manual. PSPI Publishing House: Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. p. 114.

[13] Uali, N., 2021. Akhmet Baitursynuly and actual problems of linguistic culture (thesis of the report). Tiltanym. 2, 3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2021-2-3-11

[14] Androutsopoulos, J., 2006. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 10(4), 419–438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x

[15] Herring, S.C., Androutsopoulos, J., 2015. Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In: Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., Schiffrin, D. (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 127–151.

[16] Tagg, C., 2015. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. Routledge: London, UK.

[17] Zaidi, N., Harder, H., 2023. Language Ideologies and the Vernacular in Colonial and Postcolonial South Asia. Taylor & Francis Group: Abingdon, UK.

[18] Checkel, J.T., 1999. Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly. 43(1), 83–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00112

[19] Costenbader, E., Lenzi, R., Hershow, R.B., et al., 2017. Measurement of social norms affecting modern contraceptive use: A literature review. Studies in Family Planning. 48(4), 377–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12040

[20] Akhmanova, O.S., 2013. Dictionary of Linguistic Terms. Ripol Classic: Moscow, Russia.

[21] Karaulov, Y.N., 1992. Some observations on the Russian language abroad. La Revue russe. 3(1), 31–53.

[22] Krysin, L.P., 2014. Dictionaries of foreign words. In: Effective Speech Communication (Basic Competencies). Moscow State University: Moscow, Russia. pp. 599–600.

[23] Gumperz, J.J., 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[24] Myers-Scotton, C., 1993. Social Motivations for Codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

[25] García, O., Wei, L., 2014. Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.

[26] Snow, P.C., Powell, M.B., Sanger, D.D., 2012. Oral language competence, young speakers, and the law. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 43(4), 496–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0065)

[27] Tagliamonte, S., 2005. So who? Like how? Just what?: Discourse markers in the conversations of young Canadians. Journal of Pragmatics. 37(11), 1896–1915.

[28] Bijvoet, E., Fraurud, K., 2016. What’s the target? A folk linguistic study of young Stockholmers’ constructions of linguistic norm and variation. Language Awareness. 25(1–2), 17–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122021

[29] Kuzembayeva, G.A., Polzyakova, E., Zhumagalieva, A., et al., 2023. Multilingualism and interference: A case study of Kazakh, Russian and English languages performance in Kazakhstani youth. Bulletin of the Abylai Khan Kazakh National University Philological Sciences Series. 71(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.48371/PHILS.2023.71.4.012

[30] Akynova, D., Zharkynbekova, S., Agmanova, A., et al., 2014. Language choice among the youth of Kazakhstan: English as a self-representation of prestige. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 143, 228–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.393

[31] Zharkynbekova, S., Shakhputova, Z., Anichshenko, O., et al., 2025. The speech behaviour of Kazakhstani youth in the context of interethnic communication. Journalism and Media. 6(1), 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010045

[32] Yessenbekova, U.M., Turzhan, O.I., Koshanova, K.A., et al., 2020. Role of media in addressing the socialization problems of the younger generation: The case of Kazakhstan. Media Watch. 11(2), 348–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15655/mw_2020_v11i2_195659

[33] Kappassova, A.S., Adilova, A.S., Zeinulina, A.F., et al., 2024. Intertextuality in Kazakh, Russian, and English-language media. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10(3). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.10303

[34] Kristiansen, T., 2008. The youth and the gatekeepers: Reproduction and change in language norm and variation. In: Wodak, R., Kirchhoff, U., Mitten, R. (eds.). Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 279–302.

[35] Shuxratovna, R.K., 2025. A linguistic analysis of English and Uzbek media discourse: Examining public media speech. Innovation Science and Technology. 1(7), 17–23. Available from: https://www.tiladabiyot.uz/media/Til_va_adabiyot.uz_10-son_3_vFtIP0v.pdf

[36] Buskunbaeva, L.A., Rakhmatullina, Z.Y., 2024. Code-switching in Bashkir takhmaks-chastushkas (pragmatic aspects). Nauchnyi Dialog. 13(4), 9–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-4-9-31

[37] Inamova, N., 2025. Russian language in Tik-Tok discourse: Language adaptation and identity of youth communities. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence. 1(4), 1191–1194. Available from: https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/ijai/article/view/103263

Downloads

How to Cite

Ordabayeva, Z., Mazhitayeva, S., Khamzina, K., Smakova, T., & Kadyrov, Z. (2025). Norm and Usage in Contemporary Kazakh: A Linguistic Analysis of Youth Discourse and Digital Communication. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(11), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11287