A Mixed-Methods Study on Advancing Critical Listening in English Language Teaching: Project-Based Interview Tasks in the Uzbek Undergraduate Context

Authors

  • Nargiza Khodjakulova

    Department of Teaching Theory and Methodology, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, National Research University, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan

  • Barnokhon Samatova

    Department of Teaching Theory and Methodology, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, National Research University, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan

  • Nodira Khodjakulova

    Department of Hydraulic Facilities and Engineering Structures, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, National Research University, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11324
Received: 28 July 2025 | Revised: 1 September 2025 | Accepted: 12 September 2025 | Published Online: 11 November 2025

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of interview-based project learning in developing critical listening skills among undergraduate EFL students at universities in Uzbekistan. Although such skills are crucial for academic achievement and communication, they are often neglected due to traditional approaches emphasizing repetition and bottom-up comprehension while overlooking higher-order analytical and reflective listening processes. To address this gap, the study implemented a three-stage instructional model built around structured interview tasks: (1) analysis of authentic interviews, (2) student designed and conducted interviews, and (3) peer evaluations using rubrics focused on critical listening indicators. The research was conducted with 120 philology students across four universities and employed a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-tests measuring inference, analysis, and evaluative sub-skills, while qualitative insights were obtained from semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. Three research questions guided the study: the impact of interview-based projects on critical listening sub-skills, the contribution of structured tasks to reflective and analytical listening, and student and teacher perceptions of the approach. Findings indicated significant gains in learners' ability to critically analyze spoken input and make evidence-based judgments. Both students and teachers expressed positive views of the model, emphasizing its effectiveness and relevance to contemporary EFL contexts. The results highlight the pedagogical value of integrating project-based and communicative approaches in language teaching. Structured interview tasks not only foster critical listening but also enhance digital competencies, offering a strong alternative to conventional listening practices in Uzbekistan’s higher education system.

Keywords:

Critical Listening Skills (CLS); Project-based Learning (PBL); Interview Tasks; EFL Pedagogy; Higher Education; Digital Literacy; Uzbekistan

References

[1] Field, J., 2008. Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[2] Vandergrift, L., Goh, C.C.M., 2012. Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[3] Khodjakulova, N., Miceikiene, A., 2024. The effectiveness of environmental sustainability in the development of teacher creativity and student engagement skills. E3S Web Conference. 574, 07004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457407004

[4] Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., 2001. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman: New York, NY, USA.

[5] Wilson, J.J., 2008. How to Teach Listening. Pearson Education: Harlow, UK.

[6] Nunan, D., 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA.

[7] Richards, J.C., 2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[8] Littlewood, W., 2004. The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. English Language Teaching Journal. 58(4), 319–326.

[9] Khodjaqulova N., 2024. Curriculum review of Uzbek EFL syllabi: Gaps in critical listening instruction [unpublished doctoral research manuscript]. Tashkent: National Research University “Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers”: Тоshkent, Uzbekistan.

[10] Kannazarova, Z., Juliev, M., Abuduwaili, J., et al., 2024. Drainage in irrigated agriculture: Bibliometric analysis for the period of 2017–2021. Agricultural Water Management. 305, 109118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109118

[11] Mardieva, D., Bakiyeva, G., Kannazarova, Z., et al., 2024. A bibliometric review: Interventions for enhancing speaking skills in non-English-speaking contexts. XLinguae. 17(4), 195–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.04.12

[12] Thomas, J.W., 2000. A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. The Autodesk Foundation: San Rafael, CA, USA.

[13] Beckett, G.H., Slater, T., 2005. The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. English Language Teaching Journal. 59(2), 108–116.

[14] Stoller, F.L., 2006. Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In: Beckett, G.H., Miller, P.C. (eds.). Project-based Second and Foreign Language Education: Past, Present, and Future. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA. pp. 19–40.

[15] Goh, C.C.M., 2010. Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. In: Harwood, N. (Ed.). English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 179–206.

[16] Willis, D., Willis, J., 2007. Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[17] Nguyen, T.T.M., Balakrishnan, K., 2020. Enhancing EFL learners’ critical listening skills through peer-evaluated interview projects. Asian EFL Journal. 24(6), 98–117.

[18] Shin, S., 2021. Digital storytelling and the development of critical listening and reflective skills. Journal of Language and Technology. 5(2), 45–62.

[19] Rivers, W., Temperley, M., 1978. A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[20] O’Malley, J.M., Chamot, A.U., Küpper, L., 1989. Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics. 10(4), 418–437.

[21] Vandergrift, L., 2004. Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, 3–25.

[22] Dunkel, P., 1991. Listening in the native and second/foreign language: toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly. 25(3), 431–457.

[23] Lynch, T., 1996. Communication in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[24] Krashen S., 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman: London, UK.

[25] Asher, J., 1988. Learning another Language through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook, 3rd ed. Sky Oaks Production: Los Gatos, CA, USA.

[26] McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., McLeod, B., 1983. Second Language Learning: An Information-processing Perspective. Language Learning. 33(2), 135–158.

[27] Bialystok, E., 1978. A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning. 28(1), 69–83.

[28] Nagle, S.J., Sanders, S.L., 1986. Comprehension theory and second language pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly. 20(1), 9–26.

[29] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

[30] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101.

[31] Ahour, T., Barzegar, S., 2015. A Comparative Study of Rehearsal and Loci Methods in Learning Vocabulary in EFL Context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 5(7), 1451–1457. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0507.18

Downloads

How to Cite

Khodjakulova, N., Samatova, B., & Khodjakulova, N. (2025). A Mixed-Methods Study on Advancing Critical Listening in English Language Teaching: Project-Based Interview Tasks in the Uzbek Undergraduate Context. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11324