Culture of the Balto-Slavic Border Area: Good / Bad in the Language Consciousness of Latgale Youth

Authors

  • Elvira Isajeva

    Department of Languages and Literature, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia
  • Elina Vasiljeva

    Department of Languages and Literature, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11490
Received: 5 August 2025 | Revised: 15 August 2025 | Accepted: 28 August 2025 | Published Online: 23 October 2025

Abstract

Recent cognitive studies on language and linguistic units lead to the conclusion that language, as a person's cognitive ability, plays a central role in processing, storing and transmitting not only various types of objective knowledge about the world but also evaluative knowledge. The topicality of the theme considered in the given article lies in the study of the specifics of the functioning of both Russian as a diaspora language and Latvian in the same cultural space of the eastern region of Latvia-Latgale. The study aims to characterize the ways in which evaluative judgments are expressed in the linguistic consciousness of young Russian and Latvian speakers on the basis of modelling and analysis of the associative field of the stimulus words good and bad. Theory and practice of associative experiment were used as a methodological basis for the study. The words good/bad were suggested as stimulus words. The reactions obtained as a result of the experiment were analysed according to linguistic and cultural-contextual characteristics; as well as the modelled associative fields of the stimulus words were considered as a fragment of the image of the world of the Russians and the Latvians living in the south-eastern part of Latvia, its motives and assessments. Data processing and analysis allow defining the evaluative words good/bad in Russian and Latvian linguistic worldviews as full-fledged evaluative categories in the perception of young Russian and Latvian speakers in Latgale, since in their linguistic consciousness, not only dictionary meaning is actualised, but also multilevel contextual connotations.

Keywords:

Lingual Consciousness; Free Associative Experiment; Associative Field; Evaluation

References

[1] Boldyrev, N., 2002. The Structure and Principles of Formation of Evaluative Categories. With Love for Language. Collection of Scientific Papers. pp. 103–114. Voronezh State University: Voronezh, Russia.(in Russian)

[2] Ilyushina, S., 2001. Lexical means of positive evaluation of human qualities. [Doctoral Dissertation]. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistics: Moscow, Russia.

[3] Arutyunova, N., 1999. Language and the World of Man. (in Russian)

[4] Maslova, V., 2001. Linguoculturology. PC Academy: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[5] Ufimtseva, N., 1996. Russians: Another Experience of Self-Knowledge. Ethnocultural Specificity of Linguistic Consciousness. Collection of Articles. pp.139–162. PC Eydos: Moscow, Russia.(in Russian)

[6] Janashek, J., 2011. True portraits of the Old Believers of Latgale in the XXI century. In: F. Fjodorovs (ed.). Latgale kā kultūras pierobeža, Vol. 2. pp. 152–168. Saule: Daugavpils, Latvia.(in Russian)

[7] Ivanova, N., 2014. Prohibitions of the Old Believers of Latgale. Journal of Comparative Studies. Vol. 4 (33), 182–197. Saule: Daugavpils, Latvia.

[8] Korolyova, Y., 2016. The Conception of Holidays in Culture and Language Tradition of Old Believersí in Latgale. Journal of Comparative Studies. Vol. 9 (38), 143–159. Saule: Daugavpils, Latvia.

[9] Rozin, P., Berman, L., Royzman, E., 2010. Biases in use of positive and negative words across twenty natural languages. Cognition & Emotion. 24(3), 536–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902793462

[10] Chafe, W., 2007. Language and consciousness. In: Zelazo, P.D., Moscovitch, M., Thompson, E. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp.197–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816789.014

[11] Wittgenstein, L., 2013. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Routledge: London, UK. p.144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315884950

[12] Emmorey, K., 2001. Language, Cognition, and the Brain: Insights From Sign Language Research. Psychology Press: East Sussex, UK. p.408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603982

[13] Searle, J., 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. p. 224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001

[14] Lut, K., Starenkova, H. 2022. The Relationship between Language, Culture, and Development of Society. Studies in Modern English, Würzburg, pp. 63–72. DOI: 10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-199-0-63.

[15] Isajeva, E.S., Vasiljeva, E.G., 2021. Associative field of the concept “fire” in the linguistic consciousness of native Russian speakers at the background of the Latvian linguistic culture. Russian Language Studies. 19(3), 241–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2618-8163-2021-19-3-241-252

[16] Isajeva, E., Vasiljeva, E., Stankevica, A., 2017. The concept ЗАКОН/LIKUMS (LOW) in the language consciousness of Russians and Latvians. In Proceedings of the 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017, Albena, Bulgaria, 30 March 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2017/HB31/S10.038

[17] Isajeva, E., Vasiljeva, E., Burima, M., 2016. Representation of Identity Code in a Multicultural Environment: the Concept “Bread”. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, 24–30 August 2016.

[18] Demographics, 2018. Statistical data collection. Riga: Central Statistical Bureau. (in Latvian)

[19] Fedorov, F., 2008. Spiritual space of Latgale. Latgale as a cultural borderland. Saule: Daugavpils, Latvia.

[20] Isajeva, E., Vasiljeva, E., 2018. Major Features of the concept ‘RODS/WAY’ in the notion of the Russian and Latvian linguistic personality. In Proceedings of the 5th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS SGEM2018, Vienna, Austria, 19–21 March 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.6.

[21] Salceviča, I., 2000. The White Road Singer. The New Way: Riga, Latvia. (in Latvian)

[22] Ziedonis, I., 1985. You lived a great life. Liesma: Riga, Latvia. (in Latvian)

[23] Bialystok, E., 2009. Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 12(1), 3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477

[24] Azerbaijan National Academy of Science, Institute of Linguistics named after Nasimi, Shukurlu, S., 2024. Linguocultural Features of “Good” and “Bad” Concepts in English Idioms. Path of Science. 10(4), 3023–3026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.103-28

[25] Vezhbitskaya, A., 1997. Language. Culture. Cognition. Russian Dictionaries: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

Downloads

How to Cite

Isajeva, E., & Vasiljeva, E. (2025). Culture of the Balto-Slavic Border Area: Good / Bad in the Language Consciousness of Latgale Youth. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(11), 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11490

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 11 (November 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Elvira Isajeva, Elina Vasiljeva

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.