Problems of Linguistic Ecology in Media and Online Information Spaces

Authors

  • Gulnara Abildayevna Omarbekova

    Department of the Kazakh language and Turkic studies, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Zhanar Daribekovna Baiteliyeva

    Department of the Kazakh language and Turkic studies, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Dolores Abildayevna Nurgaliyeva

    Department of Pedagogy and Educational Management, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan

  • Ainur Beketovna Donbayeva

    Department of Language Communication and Translation Studies, "Turan-Astana" University, Astana 010013, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11519
Received: 7 August 2025 | Revised: 20 October 2025 | Accepted: 21 October 2025 | Published Online: 12 November 2025

Abstract

This study focuses on the analysis of invective means increasingly used in the language of contemporary newspapers and magazines within the media space. The transformations taking place in the language of mass media are closely linked to the broader changes in the world and culture under the influence of digital culture and globalization. These transformations primarily concern communicative processes in the media sphere, which have evolved from mere acts of transmitting and receiving information into mechanisms that determine the nature of social interaction, ranging from manipulative to benevolent. An examination of media discourse reveals a growing prevalence of negative linguistic phenomena associated with verbal aggression directed at the audience. The aim of the study is therefore to identify and describe the essence of invective linguistic means, to classify them into distinct groups, to distinguish them from non-normative vocabulary, and to consider the role of juridical linguistics and media ecology in preventing linguistic violence in interpersonal and virtual communication. The research employs empirical methods (associative and sociolinguistic experiments) and theoretical methods (lexico-stylistic, lexico-semantic, communicative-pragmatic, and corrective analyses). The study produced several key results: the notion of invective linguistic means is defined; their classification is outlined; distinguishing features separating invective from non-normative vocabulary are identified; the legal foundations of uncontrolled use of invective means are analyzed; and attention is drawn to the necessity, from a media-ecolinguistic perspective, of protecting the communicative space of mass media from the use of invective expressions that cause harm to the addressee.

Keywords:

Invectives; Colloquial Speech; Media Ecolinguistics; Internet Discourse; Slang; Insult; Jurilinguistics

References

[1] Shahovskij, V.I., 2020. Ecology of language and man in a changing society. Neofilologiya. 6(22), 217–225. (in Russian)

[2] Konyushkevich, M.I., 2001. Medialinguistics as an Independent Discipline. GRDU: Grodno, Belarus. (in Russian)

[3] Maqsood, M., Sheikh, S., Shah, S.A., et al., 2023. Sociolinguistic implications of online efl learning: an empirical study of language use. PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 20(2). Available from: https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/11988?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[4] Napitupulu, M., Situmorang, S., 2022. The Influence of Digital Influencers on Linguistic Evolution in the Javanese Language. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora. 11(1), 18–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v11i1.13

[5] Lee, C., Barton, D., 2013. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003265276

[6] Tulupov, V.V., 2021. On the “language of hostility” on the national television screen. In: Current problems of screen and interactive media: Proceedings of the III Scientific Conference, Moscow, Russia; pp. 11–17. (in Russian)

[7] Murzina, I.Y., 2022. Media ecology as a problem of culture and a task of education: An axiological aspect. Izvestiya UrFN. Seriya 1. Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. 28(1), 162–173. (in Russian)

[8] Apresyan, R.G., 1997. The Strength and the Violence of a Word. Chelovek. (5), 7–13. (in Russian)

[9] Zhel'vis, V.I., 1990. The emotive aspect of speech. In Psycholinguistic Integration of Speech Action. Yaroslavl State Pedagogical Institute: Yaroslavl, Russia. p. 71. (in Russian)

[10] Posidelova, V.V., 2016. Linguistic and legal aspects of invective vocabulary in the Russian language. Filosofiya prava. (2/75), 13–17. (in Russian)

[11] Vahitova, D.K., 2013. Invective vocabulary of the Tatar language: Functional and ethnomental aspects [PhD thesis]. Institute of Language, Literature and Art of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan: Kazan, Russia. p. 35. (in Russian)

[12] Pozolotin, A.Y., 2005. Invective designations of a person as a linguocultural phenomenon (based on the material of the German language) [PhD thesis]. Volgograd State Pedagogical University Press: Volgograd, Russia. p. 21. (in Russian)

[13] Brinev, K.I., 2009. Solution for the Problem of Insult in Linguistic Expertise. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk University. Series: Philology. Art – Conducting. 36(34/172), 16–21. (in Russian)

[14] Kusov, G.V., 2005. Communicative perversion as a method for diagnosing distortion in insult. In Yurislingvistika–6: Invoktivnye manipulyativnoe funkcionirovanie yazyka. Izd-vo Altajskogo universiteta: Barnaul, Russia. pp. 44–56. (in Russian)

[15] Lenta.ru, 2016. Decl won a 50,000 ruble lawsuit against Basta for "something shaggy". Available from: https://lenta.ru/news/2016/12/07/versus/ (cited 7 December 2024). (in Russian)

[16] Glushchenko, O.A., Grishanin, N.V., Kirillina, N.V., 2021. Ecology of communication: toxicity factors in media text. Kommunikologiya. 4(4), 160–178. (in Russian)

[17] Friedman, T.L., 2006. The New York Times. Available from: http://select.nytimes.com/2006/07/21/opinion/21friedman.html.scp=48csq=shit&st=nyt (cited 21 July 2025).

[18] Zheng, J., Zompetti, P.J., 2023. “I’m not a virus”: Asian hate in Donald Trump’s rhetoric. Asian Journal of Communication. 33(5), 470–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2246509

[19] van Dejk, T.A., 1989. Language. Cognition. Communication. NaN: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[20] Aristova, V.N., 2014.Verbal racist insults in contemporary French society. Philology and the Human. (1), 74–83. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/verbalnye-rasistskie-oskorbleniya-v-sovremennom-frantsuzskom-obschestve (in Russian)

[21] Nurgazina, А., Abisheva, К., Kenjetaeva, G., et al., 2025. Perceptual-figurative concept «moral traits and qualities of a person's character». Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(3), 1067–1079. (in English)

[22] Zhel'vis, V.I., 2000. Word and Deed: The Legal Aspect of Profanity. In: Yurislingvistika. Russkij yazyk v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii. Izd-vo Alt. Barnaul: Altai University Press: Barnaul, Russia. pp. 194–206. (in Russian)

[23] Golev, D.N., 2000. Juridification of authentic language as a linguistic problem. In: Yurislingvistika – 2. Russkij yazyk v ego estestvennom i yuridicheskom bytii. Altai University Press: Barnaul, Russia. pp. 8–40. (in Russian)

[24] Shahmatova, T.S., 2013. Insult as an instrument of linguistic violence in institutional communication situations. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 155(5). (in Russian)

[25] Sharifullin, B.Y., 2004. Linguistic aggression and linguistic violence in jurilinguistics: Invectives. Yurislingvistika. (5), 120–131. (in Russian)

[26] Omarbekova, G.A., 2023. Perspectives on Proverb Use among Kazakhs: Ecological Issues. In: Omarbekova, G.A., Aasland, E. (Eds.). Contemporary Kazakh Proverb Research: Digital, Cognitive, Literary, and Ecological Approaches. Peter Lang International Academic Publishers: New York, NY, USA. pp. 5–17. Available form: https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85145428066

Downloads

How to Cite

Omarbekova, G. A., Baiteliyeva, Z. D., Nurgaliyeva, D. A., & Donbayeva, A. B. (2025). Problems of Linguistic Ecology in Media and Online Information Spaces. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 764–776. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11519