National Values as an Object of Colonial and Postcolonial Criticism in Literature: A Case Study of Mashhur Jusup

Authors

  • Bayangali Galymzhanov

    Department of Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Aliya Zhetkizgenova

    Department of Kazakh Philology, Faculty of Tourism and Languages, Sh. Yessenov Caspian University of Technologies and Engineering, Aktau 130000 , Kazakhstan

  • Marzhan Zhylkybayeva

    Department of Kazakh Philology, Faculty of Tourism and Languages, Sh. Yessenov Caspian University of Technologies and Engineering, Aktau 130000 , Kazakhstan

  • Aru Korganbayeva

    Department of Kazakh Philology, Faculty of Tourism and Languages, Sh. Yessenov Caspian University of Technologies and Engineering, Aktau 130000 , Kazakhstan

  • Zhomazhan Bektassova

    Department of Philology, KazNU Art, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11564
Received: 9 August 2025 | Revised: 1 September 2025 | Accepted: 16 September 2025 | Published Online: 14 October 2025

Abstract

Kazakh literature has undergone significant transformations under colonial and postcolonial influences, with authors negotiating the tensions between oral heritage and written literary forms. This study investigates how Mashhur Jusup Kopeev integrates oral traditions—such as genealogies, proverbs, heroic tales, and oral verse—into his written works, and how these strategies articulate national values, cultural identity, and subaltern voices. The research employs a discourse oriented and literary-linguistic analysis of selected poems, short stories, and narrative fragments, drawing on concepts from postcolonial theory, hybridity, and textual semiotics, with comparative insights from global authors like Tagore and Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. Findings indicate that Kopeev's textualization of oral forms creates a hybrid literary style that foregrounds spiritual poetics, narrative memory, and cultural resilience, simultaneously negotiating local traditions and broader literary frameworks. His works demonstrate the strategic preservation and recontextualization of Kazakh oral knowledge, reflecting both cultural reverence and innovative literary transformation. The discussion emphasizes how Kopeev's poetics functions as a medium of resistance, identity formation, and postcolonial articulation, situating Kazakh literature within global discourses of hybridity and memory. The study concludes that Kopeev's approach offers a model for integrating oral and written modalities while reinforcing national and cultural continuity. Limitations include the selective textual focus, suggesting the need for further research encompassing a broader corpus and reception studies to fully capture the range of his literary strategies.

Keywords:

Mashhur Jusup Kopeev; Kazakh Literature; Oral Tradition; Cultural Identity; Postcolonial Hybridity; Literary Memory

References

[1] Said, E.W., 1978. Orientalism. Pantheon Books: New York, NY, USA.

[2] Spivak, G.C., 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In: Nelson, C., Grossberg, L. (eds.). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA. pp. 271–313.

[3] Bhabha, H.K., 1994. The Location of Culture. Routledge: London, UK.

[4] Fanon, F., 1963. The Wretched of the Earth. Farrington, C. (trans). Grove Press: New York, NY, USA.

[5] Achebe, C., 2008. Things Fall Apart. Norton Critical Editions. W.W. Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA.

[6] Tagore, R., 2005. The Home and the World. Guha, S. (trans.). Penguin Books India: New Delhi, India.

[7] García Márquez, G., 2003. One Hundred Years of Solitude. Rabassa, G. (trans.). HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA.

[8] Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., Tiffin, H., 1989. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. Routledge: London, UK.

[9] Kenzhebekova, D., 2018. Kazakh Oral Tradition as Cultural Resistance under Russian Rule. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 10(2), 123–135.

[10] Zhusipova, L., 2018. The Revival of Mashhur Zhusup’s Legacy in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan. Central Asian Review. 25(3), 45–57.

[11] Kudaibergenova, D.T., 2013. “Imagining Community” in Soviet Kazakhstan: A Historical Analysis of Narrative on Nationalism in Kazakh-Soviet Literature. Nationalities Papers. 41(5), 854–870.

[12] Moore, D.C., 2001. Is the Post- in Postcolonial the Post- in Post-Soviet? Toward a Global Postcolonial Critique. PMLA. 116(1), 111–128.

[13] Kossyn, M., 2024. Genealogy of Being in Postcolonial Kazakh Culture: Re-Reading the Words of Edification. Comparative Literature: East & West, 8(2), 196–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25723618.2024.2433842

[14] Tolz, V., 2015. Russia’s Own Orient: The Politics of Identity and Oriental Studies in the Late Imperial and Early Soviet Period. Modern Asian Studies. 49(4), 1289–1328.

[15] Fanon, F., 1952. Black Skin, White Masks. Éditions du Seuil: Paris, France.

[16] Fanon, F., 2004. The Wretched of the Earth. Philcox, R.(trans.). Grove Press: New York, NY, USA.

[17] Sabol, S., 2003. Russian Colonization and the Genesis of Kazak National Consciousness. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.

[18] Hutcheon, L., 2003. A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358856

[19] Wa Thiong’o, N., 1986. Decolonising the Mind: The Politics of Language in African Literature. Heinemann Kenya: Nairobi, Kenya.

[20] Tlostanova, M., 2019. Decolonial Encounters: Post-Soviet Central Asia in the Postcolonial World. Interventions. 21(4), 548–566.

[21] Kaliyeva, S., 2021. Reclaiming the Past: Kazakh Literature’s Role in Nation-Building. Journal of Eurasian Literature. 8(1), 30–49.

[22] Kopeev, M.-Zh., 2013. Shyğarmalary. Tom 2. EKO: Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. pp. 433. (in Kazakh)

[23] Gandhi, L., 2020. Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.

[24] Santos, B. de S., 2014. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK.

[25] Scott, J.C., 2020. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA.

[26] Ahmed, S., 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.

[27] Ricoeur, P., 2018. Time and Narrative, Volume 1. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

[28] Hirsch, M., 2012. Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[29] Eliade, M., 2005. Myth and Reality. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA.

[30] Glissant, É., 1997. Poetics of Relation. University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

[31] Kopeev, M.-Zh., 2013. Shyğarmalary. Tom 1. EKO: Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. pp. 519. (in Kazakh)

[32] Scheub, H., 2002. The Poem in the Story: Music, Poetry, and Narrative. University of Wisconsin Press: Madison, WI, USA.

[33] Kopeev, M.-Zh., 2013. Shyğarmalary. Tom 4. EKO: Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. pp. 545. (in Kazakh)

[34] Kopeev, M.-Zh., 2013. Shyğarmalary. Tom 5. EKO: Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. pp. 482. (in Kazakh)

[35] Bal, M., 2009. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. University of Toronto Press: Toronto, ON, Canada.

[36] Achebe, C., 2011. Things Fall Apart. Penguin Books: London, UK.

[37] Assmann, J., 2011. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[38] Boym, S., 2001. The Future of Nostalgia. Basic Books: New York, NY, USA.

[39] Spivak, G.C., 2010. Strategic Essentialism (Interview). In: Harasym, S. (ed.). The Post-Colonial Critic: Interviews, Strategies, Dialogues. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 3–15.

Downloads

How to Cite

Galymzhanov, B., Zhetkizgenova , A., Zhylkybayeva, M., Korganbayeva, A., & Bektassova , Z. (2025). National Values as an Object of Colonial and Postcolonial Criticism in Literature: A Case Study of Mashhur Jusup. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(10), 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i10.11564

Issue

Article Type

Review