Decoding Scam Calls: A Linguistic Analysis of Fraudulent Manipulation Tactics

Authors

  • Khalid Ahmed

    Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts (FELA), INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Ruqia Saba Ashraf

    Department of English, The Women University, Multan 60000, Pakistan

  • Hajra Nokhaiz

    Department of English, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54782, Pakistan

  • Rabindra Dev Prasad

    Faculty of Education and Liberal Arts (FELA), INTI International University, Nilai 71800, Malaysia

  • Mehwish Khubaib

    Centre of Graduate Studies, Asia e University, Kuala Lumpur 50000, Malaysia

  • Muhammad Asad Habib

    Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11675
Received: 17 August 2025 | Revised: 28 September 2025 | Accepted: 29 September 2025 | Published Online: 28 November 2025

Abstract

Phone call scams have become increasingly prevalent, driven by limitations in communication protocols and legal hurdles in the modern digital landscape, while advancements in technology have made it easier for scammers to conceal their identities. This study investigates the language-based persuasive strategies scammers employ through phone calls to trap their targets in Pakistan. Robert Cialdini's persuasion principles provide a theoretical framework for the present study. The dataset consists of ten audio recordings of scam calls retrieved from YouTube channels. The findings reveal that scam callers adeptly exploit social cues like 'reciprocity' by feigning helpfulness, 'commitment and consistency' through manipulating scripts, 'social proof' with fabricated success stories, 'authority' by assuming authoritative roles, 'liking' via false empathy, and 'scarcity' by creating artificial time constraints. The results show how scammers utilize language to fulfil their malice, shedding light on the psychological processes that make people vulnerable to deceptive tactics. This research enhances psychological insights for responding to fraudulent offers in scam calls, highlights the importance of knowledge and digital proficiency in improving detection and prevention mechanisms, and empowers individuals to recognize phone scams more effectively, contributing to SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions by reducing organized crime.

Keywords:

Persuasive Strategies; Scam Calls; Scarcity; Psychological Process; Reciprocity; Organized crime

References

[1] Russon, M.-A., 2021. Why phone scams are so difficult to tackle. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-58254354 (cited 15 May 2024).

[2] Dhamija, R., Tygar, J.D., Hearst, M., 2006. Why phishing works. In Proceedings of the CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, QC, Canada, 22–27 April 2006; pp. 581–590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124861

[3] Keromytis, A.D., 2012. A comprehensive survey of voice over IP security research. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials. 14(2), 514–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.031611.00112

[4] Langenderfer, J., Shimp, T.A., 2001. Consumer vulnerability to scams, swindles, and fraud: A new theory of visceral influences on persuasion. Psychology and Marketing. 18(7), 763–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1029

[5] Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K., 1996. Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory. 6(3), 203–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x

[6] Reyna, V.F., 2021. A scientific theory of gist communication and misinformation resistance, with implications for health, education, and policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(15), e1902449117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912441117

[7] Cross, C., 2015. No laughing matter: Blaming the victim of online fraud. International Review of Victimology. 21(2), 187–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758015571471

[8] Ahmed, Z., Su, L., Ahmed, K., 2017. Pakistani Youth Manipulated through Night-packages Advertising Discourse. Human Systems Management. 36(2), 151–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-171762

[9] Ahmed, Z., Ahmed, K., Zhang, J., et al., 2019. Manipulation of Pakistani Women through Skin-whitening Advertising Discourse. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences, Wuhan, China, 12–14 January 2019; pp. 107–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3312662.3312705

[10] Van Dijk, T.A., 2008. Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3

[11] Ng, P.S.S., Mok, Z.C.E., Phan, K.Y., et al., 2024. Mitigating social media cybercrime: revolutionising with AES encryption and generative AI. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology. 46(2), 124–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.46.2.124154

[12] Finkela, K.M., 2014. Identity Theft: Trends and Issues. Congressional Research Service: Washington, DC, USA.

[13] Hanif, Z., Tahir, Z., Ahmed, K., 2024. Significance of Mother Tongue on Second Language Acquisition: The Case of English Learning. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences. 3(2), 54–59. Available from: https://ijciss.org/index.php/ijciss/article/view/611

[14] Ahmed, K., Ali, S., Habib, M.A., et al., 2024. Pragmatic perception of politeness in disagreement by Pakistani ESL learners. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Science. 22(2), 10889–10913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00822

[15] Khaleel, B., Nordin, U.K.U.M., Ahmed, K., et al., 2024. Societal stigmatization and support mechanism for rape victims: an analysis of linguistic features of rape judgments in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Science. 22(2), 980–994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.0069

[16] Khaleel, B., Ahmed, K., 2024. Navigating the legal landscape: a discourse analysis of domestic law in Pakistan. International Research Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 3(1), 15–33.

[17] Ahmed, K., Zahra, F.T., Amin, T., et al., 2023. Voices from the world: an analysis of discourse fragments from world leaders on Covid-19. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies. 1(4), 783–820.

[18] Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N., 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

[19] Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Longman: London, UK.

[20] Van Dijk, T.A., 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society. 4(2), 249–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006

[21] Cialdini, R.B., 1984. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, 1st ed. HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA.

[22] Xiong, X., Guo, S., Gu, L., et al., 2018. Reciprocity anxiety: Individual differences in feeling discomfort in reciprocity situations. Journal of Economic Psychology. 67, 149–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.05.007

[23] Cialdini, R.B., 2006. Influence: The Psychology of Principles of Persuasion, revised ed. HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA.

[24] Fogg, B.J., 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do, Vol.2002 December. Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/764008.763957

[25] Halttu, K., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., 2022. Susceptibility to social influence strategies and persuasive system design: exploring the relationship. Behaviour and Information Technology. 41(12), 2705–2726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1945685

Downloads

How to Cite

Ahmed, K., Ashraf, R. S., Nokhaiz, H., Prasad, R. D., Khubaib , M., & Habib, M. A. (2025). Decoding Scam Calls: A Linguistic Analysis of Fraudulent Manipulation Tactics. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 1660–1670. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11675