Exploring Teachers' and Students' Readiness for the Implementation of Eco-ELT in Rural Indonesian EFL Contexts

Authors

  • Arif Bulan

    Department of English Education, Institute of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences (STKIP) Yapis Dompu, Dompu 84212, Indonesia

  • Risca Ariska Ramadhan

    Department of Management, Institute of Economic Sciences (STIE) Yapis Dompu, Dompu 84213, Indonesia

  • Nur Wahyuni

    Department of English Education, Institute of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences (STKIP) Yapis Dompu, Dompu 84212, Indonesia

  • Taufik Taufik

    Department of Indonesian Language and Literature Education, Institute of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences (STKIP) Yapis Dompu, Dompu 84214, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11677
Received: 17 August 2025 | Revised: 25 August 2025 | Accepted: 3 September 2025 | Published Online: 27 October 2025

Abstract

This study examines the acceptance and readiness for implementing Ecological-English Language Teaching (Eco-ELT) in Dompu schools, focusing on: (1) the beliefs and motivation of students and teachers in integrating environmental themes into English instruction; (2) the challenges of implementation; and (3) preferences for digital learning resources and locally relevant topics. A mixed-methods, cross-sectional design was employed, involving 113 students and 26 teachers. Quantitative data were collected via Likert-scale questionnaires, while qualitative insights were obtained through in-depth interviews. Quantitative analysis was conducted using JASP to generate descriptive statistics, and qualitative data were thematically analyzed. Findings revealed a high perceived usefulness of Eco-ELT among students (mean = 4.01) and teachers (mean = 4.34), with more than 75% selecting “Agree” or “Strongly Agree.” Teachers identified policy support, training, and adequate time allocation as critical, with curriculum support items achieving 100% agreement among them. Both groups preferred interactive, visually engaging, project-based digital materials linked to local environmental issues such as pollution and deforestation (teachers: mean = 4.39; students: mean = 3.78). The results suggest that successful Eco-ELT implementation requires synergy between student motivation, teacher commitment, and sustained institutional support. Policy endorsement, locally contextualised learning materials, and continuous professional development are essential to maximising the potential of Eco-ELT to integrate language proficiency with ecological awareness.

Highlights

  • Teachers and students in rural Dompu show strong readiness and motivation to adopt Ecological English Language Teaching (Eco-ELT).
  • Eco-ELT enhances English proficiency while fostering ecological awareness and critical 21st-century skills.
  • Key barriers include limited instructional time, lack of training, and insufficient institutional support, underscoring the need for stronger policy and curriculum support.
  • Both groups strongly prefer interactive, project-based digital resources contextualised to local environmental issues.
  • This study provides novel empirical evidence of Eco-ELT readiness in a rural Indonesian setting, addressing a gap in global literature.

Keywords:

Eco-ELT; Motivation; Implementation Challenges; Digital Teaching Materials; Local Environmental Issues

References

[1] Deetjen, C., Ludwig, C., 2021. Going green in the EFL classroom: An introduction. Ecozon@. 12(1), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37536/ecozona.2021.12.1.4294

[2] Jodoin, J.J., 2020. Promoting language education for sustainable development: A program effects case study in Japanese higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 21(4), 779–798.

[3] Zaimoğlu, S., 2024. Exploring research trends in sustainability in English language education from 2014 to 2024: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Language Research. 8(2), 1–18.

[4] Davari, H., Hassani, G., Iranmehr, A., et al., 2025. Environmental communication through language education: Iranian teachers’ perceptions on integrating environmental communication pedagogy into English language teaching. Environmental Communication. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2025.2464171

[5] Janes, J., McCunn, L.J., 2022. Introducing interdisciplinary curricula into conservation biology: Exploring changes in students’ perceived proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Educational Research and Practice. 12(1). Available from: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/jerap/vol12/iss1/20 (cited 27 July 2025).

[6] Saiful, J.A., 2023. Eco-ELT for environmental research and praxis in ELT. Journal of English as a Foreign Language. 13(2), 373–398.

[7] UNESCO, 2012. Education for Sustainable Development: Sourcebook. UNESCO: Paris, France.

[8] Kalsum, H., Humaeroah, Agussalim, 2025. Eco-ELT: Transforming English language teaching through sustainable and innovative materials. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature. 12(2), 2350–2360.

[9] Saiful, J.A., 2020. New innovation in English language teaching: Revealing concepts and applications of Eco-ELT. TELL: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal. 8(1), 63–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30651/tell.v8i1.4604

[10] Stibbe, A., 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA. p. 210.

[11] Siswanto, S., Karimullah, K., Prasetyawati, R., et al., 2019. Environmental cultured education and its implication on the student’s competencies in an Adiwiyata school. Cakrawala Pendidikan. 38(3), 552–564.

[12] Sekarwulan, K., Hendarti, L., Hadju, R.Z., et al., 2024. Climate Change Education: An Implementation Guide for Educational Units and Stakeholders. Badan Standar, Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP) Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi: Jakarta, Indonesia. (in Indonesian)

[13] Tatin, I.A.G., Triyono, S., Jacobs, G.M., et al., 2024. An analysis of environmental education in Indonesian EFL elementary school textbooks. International Journal of English Language Studies. 12(3), 3–16.

[14] Bulan, A., Ramadhan, R.A., Wahyuni, N., 2024. Need analysis for developing English teaching materials using the Eco-ELT approach to enhance environmental literacy among high school students in Dompu Regency. Journal of Pedagogical and Instructional Practices. 4(1), 72–80.

[15] Abbass, K., Qasim, M.Z., Song, H., et al., 2022. A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(28), 42539–42559.

[16] Kwee, C.T.T., 2021. I want to teach sustainable development in my English classroom: A case study of incorporating sustainable development goals in English teaching. Sustainability. 13(8), 4195.

[17] Şanal, Y., Sezgin, S., Döker, S.D., et al., 2023. How to integrate sustainable development in English lessons: Reflections from teachers, students and academicians. Qualitative Inquiry in English Teaching and Pedagogy. 1(1), 50–72.

[18] Yu, B., Guo, W.Y., Fu, H., 2024. Sustainability in English language teaching: Strategies for empowering students to achieve the sustainable development goals. Sustainability. 16(8), 3325.

[19] Lee, D.B., Nguyen, T.H.N., 2024. The treatment of environmental literacy in the ELT textbooks in Vietnam. Cogent Education. 11(1), 2425898.

[20] Pratama, A., Sumardi, M.S., 2022. Contextual teaching and learning using local content material on students’ reading comprehension at a junior high school in Indonesia. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education. 3(2), 184–194.

[21] Sumarmi, S., Aliman, M., Mutia, T., 2021. The effect of digital eco-learning in student worksheet flipbook to environmental project literacy and pedagogic competency. Journal of Technology and Science Education. 11(2), 357–370.

[22] Alyani, E., 2024. Teachers’ perspective on addressing environmental issue in English language learning. Loquen: English Studies Journal. 17(2), 19–34. (in Indonesian)

[23] Pratolo, B.W., Purwanti, E., Humanika, E.S., et al., 2024. Eco-lexicons in ELT: Analyzing environmental narratives through critical discourse analysis. BIO Web of Conferences. 148, 02035.

[24] Faizin, H.A., Permatasari, I., Aziz, M., 2022. The value of local content in ELT materials in Indonesia. Journal of English Language and Education. 7(2), 19–26.

[25] Iswandari, D.C., Prayogo, J.A., Cahyono, B.Y., 2017. Effect of environmental problem-based learning on the Indonesian EFL students’ environment-related vocabulary mastery and writing ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 7(8), 608–616.

[26] Kurniawati, D., Indrasari, N., 2023. Integrating environmental issues in extensive listening: Perceptions of EFL learners. International TESOL Journal. 5(2), 284–301

[27] Chien, S.C., Knoble, C., 2024. Research of education for sustainable development: Understanding new emerging trends and issues after SDG 4. Journal of Sustainability Research. 6(1), 1–29.

[28] Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., 2017. Narratives in climate change discourse. WIREs Climate Change. 8(1), e429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.429

[29] Ali, S.U., Lestari, S.A.B., Bahara, S.R., et al., 2024. Eco-literacy content in language learning and its impact on students’ pro-environmental habit at State Junior High School (SMPN) 4 of Ternate City. Edu Journals. 4(2), 120–128.

[30] Kazazoglu, S., 2025. Environmental education through eco-literacy: Integrating sustainability into English language teaching. Sustainability. 17(5), 2156.

[31] Saiful, J.A., Yunianti, S., 2024. “Climate change is destructive; I will address it in my class”: Preservice English teachers’ perspectives on climate change and its integration into ELT. PASAA. 69, 499–532.

[32] Thanakong, K., Kaowiwattanakul, S., 2024. Green discussion: Raising ESP students’ environmental awareness through film circles. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(10), 3257–3267.

[33] Krashen, S.D., 1984. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK. p. 202.

[34] Vygotsky, L.S., 1981. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. p. 159.

[35] Ghalia, N.H., Karra, S.Y., 2023. Teacher readiness and learner competency in using modern technological learning spaces. Sustainability. 15(6), 4928.

[36] Manasia, L., Ianos, M.G., Chicioreanu, T.D., 2019. Pre-service teacher preparedness for fostering education for sustainable development: An empirical analysis of central dimensions of teaching readiness. Sustainability. 12(1), 166.

[37] Wu, P., Yang, L., Hu, X., et al., 2022. How K12 teachers’ readiness influences their intention to implement STEM education: Exploratory study based on decomposed theory of planned behavior. Applied Sciences. 12(23), 11989.

[38] Letouzey-Pasquier, J., Gremaud, B., Blondin, S., et al., 2023. Development of teachers’ practices in the field of education for sustainable development (ESD): A discursive community of interdisciplinary practices focusing on the theme of chocolate. Environmental Education Research. 29(8), 1155–1169.

[39] Nahdi, K., Basri, H., Amrullah, et al., 2024. Integration of SDGs in language teaching: Assessing the response of Indonesian researchers – A systematic literature review using the SPAR methods. Language Teaching Research Quarterly. 42, 55–68.

[40] Çemçem, G.D., Korkmaz, Ö., Kukul, V., 2024. Readiness of teachers for blended learning: A scale development study. Education and Information Technologies. 29(17), 23631–23655.

[41] Imanova, D., Akzhigitova, A., Zabrodskaja, A., 2025. Language-in-education policy for English language teaching in public schools of Kazakhstan: Top-down vs. bottom-up approaches. Education Sciences. 15(1), 66.

[42] Costa, M.L., 2025. Artificial intelligence and data literacy in rural schools’ teaching practices: Knowledge, use, and challenges. Education Sciences. 15(3), 352.

[43] Putri, I.G.A.P.E., 2018. Critical environmental education in tertiary English language teaching (ELT): A collaborative digital storytelling project. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 8(2). Available from: http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/article/view/13280 (cited 27 July 2025).

[44] Oktarina, Y., Inderawati, R., Petrus, I., 2022. Developing local culture-based EFL reading materials for the 21st-century learning. Studies in English Language and Education. 9(3), 1128–1147.

[45] Davis, F.D., Granić, A., 2024. The Technology Acceptance Model: 30 Years of TAM [Internet]. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2

[46] Saleh, S.S., Nat, M., Aqel, M., 2022. Sustainable adoption of e-learning from the TAM perspective. Sustainability. 14(6), 3690.

[47] Alamer, A., 2022. Basic psychological needs, motivational orientations, effort, and vocabulary knowledge: A comprehensive model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 44(1), 164–184.

[48] Alamer, A., 2024. Motivation and language learning. In: Reference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 1–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323955041002234

[49] Weiner, B.J., 2009. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science. 4(1), 67.

[50] Mishra, D., 2025. Mayer’s cognitive theory of multimedia learning: An overview. In: Mishra, D. (ed.). Technology Driven Language Learning: Innovations and Applications. Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 7–16.

[51] Zaffini, E.J., 2018. Communities of practice and legitimate peripheral participation: A literature review. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education. 36(3), 38–43.

Downloads

How to Cite

Bulan, A., Ramadhan, R. A., Wahyuni, N., & Taufik, T. (2025). Exploring Teachers’ and Students’ Readiness for the Implementation of Eco-ELT in Rural Indonesian EFL Contexts. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(11), 1211–1224. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11677

Issue

Article Type

Article