The Use of Nouns and Verbs in the Work Munyat al-Ghuzat

Authors

  • Kuanyshbek KENZHALIN

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Gulzhanat BEGIMOVA

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Aizhan SHORMAKOVA

    The Department of Kazakh Language and Literature, A. Kusainov Eurasian Humanitarian Institute, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Nurbek SHALGYNBAY

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Ali BAIBOSSYN

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

  • Fariza MUKHTAROVA

    The Department of Kazakh Linguistics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11737
Received: 20 August 2025 | Revised: 9 October 2025 | Accepted: 14 October 2025 | Published Online: 21 October 2025

Abstract

Written monuments in the Kipchak language cover the XI–XVI centuries. At different periods, they employed different scripts. The known Kipchak written monuments mainly used four alphabets: Old Arabic script, Old Armenian script, Old Russian script, and the ancient Gothic alphabet. Among these, the Kipchak monuments written in Arabic script appeared during the Mamluk rule. The tradition of comparative studies of Turkic languages, compiling dictionaries, and teaching the Kipchak language to foreigners constituted a specific era in the Mamluk lands. The purposes and contents of monuments from this era were diverse. This article analyzes the lexical features of nouns in the "Munyat al-Ghuzat", a monument belonging to the Mamluk Kipchak period. In the text, names of weapons, movement terms, somatisms, and color terms are frequently used. The somatisms and color terms are compared with those in modern Kazakh and other Turkic languages. The Mamluk Kipchaks constitute an important part of the overall Kipchak written heritage. During their period, dictionaries, literary works, and grammatical textbooks for language learning were written. These works are directly related to the Kipchak language. The spoken and literary forms of medieval Kipchak have significance in studying the history of the Kazakh language. "Munyat al-Ghuzat" is a work devoted to the art of warfare. It serves as a reference reflecting centuries of spiritual and material wealth of the nation. Its vocabulary consists mainly of Old Turkic words. Since the work was intended as a manual to teach military skills to future warriors, it was written in simple and clear language. From its lexical content, the work can be linked to the history of the Kazakh language. This monument remains underexplored in linguistics. Studying its vocabulary is important for the history of the Kazakh language.

Keywords:

Mamluk Kipchaks; Kipchak Language; Kipchak Written Monuments; Modern Kazakh Language; Color Terms; Verbs; Munyat al-Ghuzat

References

[1] Qaidar, A., Orazov, M., 2004. Introduction to Turkology. Arys Publishing: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[2] Eckmann, J., 1963. Mamluk-Kipchak Literature. Central Asiatic Journal. 8, 85–99. (in Turkish)

[3] Mohammad, R., 2018. Affixes and Their Functions in Mamluk Kipchak Turkish. Ege University: İzmir, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

[4] Baskakov, N.A., 1962. Introduction to the Study of Turkic Languages. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[5] Johanson, L., 2016. Turkic Languages in Contact. Harrassowitz Verlag: Wiesbaden, Germany.

[6] Bazarbayeva, Z.M., 2023. Evolution of vofes (vocalism) in the Turkic (Kypchak) languages. Tiltanym. 89(1), 34–43. Available from: https://www.tiltanym.kz/jour/article/view/793/512 (in Kazakh)

[7] Muhammed, R., Torebekov., S., 2021. Turkic borrowings in the Arabic language of the Mamluk-Kipchak written monuments. Turkic Studies Journal, 3 (4), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2021-4-52-60 (in Kazakh)

[8] Malbakuly, М., Seitbekova, А., 2024. On the historical-lexicographic value of the medieval dictionary within the context of «Khosrow ua Shirin». Turkic Studies Journal, 6(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.32523/2664-5157-2024-2-174-191. (in Kazakh)

[9] Aubakirova, K., Jubatova, B., Mustafayeva, A., et al., 2015. Written manuscripts in ancient Kipchak language of 13–15th centuries and their research problems in Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6(5), 575–581. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p575

[10] Sarı Uğurlu, B., 2025. A scoping review of research aiming to enhance the early literacy skills of young Turkish children through dialogic reading. Reading Psychology. 46(4), 410–434.

[11] Uğurlu, M., 1987. Munyatul Guzat: Text and Index. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Yayınları: Ankara, Turkey. (in Turkish)

[12] Mamyrbekova, G., Seitbekova, A., 2013. Thesaurus Dictionary of Abilgazy Bahadur Khan's “Genealogy of the Turks”. Firma Ornäk: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[13] Belbaeva, M., 1988. Dictionary of Homonyms of the Kazakh Language. Mektep Publishing: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[14] Ysqaqov, A., 1991. Modern Kazakh Language. Ana Tili: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[15] Aydarov, G., Kurysjanov, A., Tomanov, M., 1971. The Language of Ancient Turkic Written Monuments. Mektep: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[16] The general editorial office headed by Komekov, B., 2013. Eurasian Kipchaks: History, Language and Monuments. The collection of materials International Conference. L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University: Astana, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[17] Syzdyqova, R., 2014. Words Speak, Vol. 4. El-Shezhire: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[18] Radloff, V.V., 1893. Samples of Folk Literature of the Northern Turkish Tribes. St. Petersburg, Russia. (in German)

[19] Kononov, A.N., 1956. Grammar of the Modern Turkish Literary Language. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[20] Malov, S.E., 1951. Monuments of Ancient Turkic Writing. АН СССР: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[21] Clauson, G., 1972. An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

[22] Doerfer, G., 1963–1975. Turkish and Mongolian Elements in New Persian. Franz Steiner Verlag: Wiesbaden, Germany. (in German)

[23] Tenishev, E.R. (Ed.), 1984. Comparative-Historical Grammar of Turkic Languages. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[24] Shcherbak, A.M., 1987. Essays on Comparative Grammar of Turkic Languages. Nauka: Leningrad, Russia. (in Russian)

[25] Sagyndykuly, B., 1994. Lexicon of the History of the Kazakh Language. Qazaq University Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[26] Zhunisbek, A., 1996. Phonological System of the Kazakh Language. Qazaq University Press: Almaty, Kazakhstan. (in Kazakh)

[27] Kashgari, M., 1915. Compendium of the Turkic Dialects, Atalay, A. (Trans.). Matbaa-i Amire: Istanbul, Turkey. (in Old Turkic)

[28] Dal', V.I., 1880. Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. M. O. Wolf: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian)

[29] Samoilovich, A.N., 1922. Some Tasks of Turkology. AN RSFSR: Petrograd, Russia. (in Russian)

[30] Tekin, T., 1968. A Grammar of Orkhon Turkic. Indiana University: Bloomington, IL, USA.

[31] Räsänen, M., 1969. Attempt at An Etymological Dictionary of the Turkic Languages. Helsinki University: Helsinki, Finland. (in German)

Downloads

How to Cite

KENZHALIN, K., BEGIMOVA, G., SHORMAKOVA, A., SHALGYNBAY, N., BAIBOSSYN, A., & MUKHTAROVA, F. (2025). The Use of Nouns and Verbs in the Work Munyat al-Ghuzat. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(11), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i11.11737