Contrastive Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in English and Turkish Death Notices

Authors

  • Dilek Fidan

    Department of Turkish and Social Science Education, Kocaeli University, İzmit 41001, Türkiye
  • Esra Aydın

    Department of Turkish and Social Science Education, Kocaeli University, İzmit 41001, Türkiye
  • Gökhan Soyşekerci

    School of Foreign Languages, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya 07425, Türkiye

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11830
Received: 27 August 2025 | Revised: 25 September 2025 | Accepted: 10 October 2025 | Published Online: 7 November 2025

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the discourse structures of death notices written in various cultural contexts, using interpersonal metadiscourse model as a theoretical framework. The distribution of interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers in death notices published in English and Turkish newspapers was examined to determine how these markers contribute to discourse organization. To achieve this goal, the document analysis method—one of the qualitative research approaches—was employed. The corpus of the study comprises 557 death notice texts (33,618 words; 449 in English and 108 in Turkish), systematically coded and analyzed for interactive and interactional markers under this model. The study found that while the frequency of interactive markers was similar in both cultures, significant cross-cultural differences emerged in the distribution and normalized frequency values (calculated per 1000 words) of interactional markers, which show how the writer influences the reader, were different. Turkish, for instance, did not employ any hedges. Attitude markers were the most commonly used interactional metadiscourse markers in both languages, and the use of euphemistic language use was often preferred to express the event of death. This cross-cultural variation underlines how cultural norms shape linguistic choices in sensitive events like death, thereby demonstrating the sociological embeddedness of discourse. By addressing an understudied genre within a cross-cultural framework, the study contributes to the fields of discourse analysis, genre studies, and intercultural pragmatics.

Keywords:

Interactive Discourse Markers; Interactional Discourse Markers; Death Notices; Death Announcement; Newspaper

References

[1] Hançerlioğlu, O., 1975. Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Remzi Kitabevi: İstanbul, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

[2] Örnek, S.V., 1971. Death in Anatolian Folklore. DTCF Yayınları: Ankara, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

[3] Özgen, M., 2025. Death perception in Anatolian culture: Good and bad death from sociological and folkloric perspective. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences. 24(1), 120–140. (in Turkish)

[4] Feifel, H., 1959. Attitudes toward death in some normal and mentally ill populations. In The Meaning of Death. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA. pp. 114–130.

[5] Hume, J., 2000. Obituaries in American Culture. University Press of Mississippi: Jackson, MS, USA.

[6] Ergin, M., 2010. Taking it to the grave: Gender, cultural capital and ethnicity in Turkish death announcements. Journal of Death and Dying. 60(2), 175–197.

[7] Ergin, M., 2023. Eternal life as privilege: Cultural boundaries and social stratification in death announcements (1950–2010). Death Studies. 47(4), 461–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2022.2089778

[8] Al-Ali, M.N., 2005. Communicating messages of solidarity, promotion, and pride in death announcements genre in Jordanian newspapers. Discourse & Society. 16(1), 5–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926505048228

[9] Swales, J., 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[10] Bhatia, V.K., 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman: London, UK.

[11] Hyland, K., 2009. Academic Discourse: English in A Global Context. Continuum: London, UK.

[12] Uzun, L., 2006. Scientific discourse and its characteristics. In: Karakütük, K. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 1st National Congress of Periodical Publishing in Social Sciences. pp. 133–140. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Inayet-Aydin/publication/321361249_Sosyal_Bilimlerde_Arastirmadan_Yayina_Etik_Degerler/links/5a1e9f350f7e9b9d5effff08/Sosyal-Bilimlerde-Arastirmadan-Yayina-Etik-Degerler.pdf (cited 25 August 2025). (in Turkish)

[13] Altun, M.E., 2024. A semiotic analysis of English obituaries. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 28, 86–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1481811 (in Turkish)

[14] Ergin, M., 2012. Religiosity and the construction of death in Turkish death announcements, 1970–2009. Death Studies. 36(3), 270–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2011.553339

[15] Borde, S., 2015. Late Modern English death notices: Transformations of a traditional lay audience. In: Bös, B., Kornexl, L. (Eds.). Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 103–134.

[16] Aliakbari, M., Tarlani-Aliabadi, H., 2016. Communicating sociocultural norms and social and religious practices in Iranian death notices. Social Semiotics. 26(2), 185–207.

[17] Facchinetti, R., 2016. Birte Bös and Lucia Kornexl (eds.), Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse (Advances in Historical Linguistics 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015. Pp. xiv + 254. ISBN 9789027200846. English Language & Linguistics. 20(2), 353–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000149

[18] Landert, D., 2017. Review of Birte Bös and Lucia Kornexl (eds.). Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse. Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 5. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins, 2015, xv + 254 pp., € 99.00/$ 149.00. Anglia : Journal of English Philology. 135(2), 358–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ang-2017-0029

[19] Laurila, A., 2020. The development of death notices in America: A case study of the New York Times from 1852 to 2002 [Master’s thesis]. University of Turku: Turku, Finland.

[20] Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK.

[21] Hyland, K., 1998. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics. 30, 437–455.

[22] Lautamatti, L., 1978. Observations on the development of the topic in simplified discourse. AFinLAn Vuosikirja. 71–104. Available from: https://journal.fi/afinlavk/article/view/57428

[23] Williams, J.M., 1989. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace, 3rd ed. Scott Foresman: Glenview, IL, USA.

[24] Crismore, A., 1983. Metadiscourse: What is it and how is it used in school and non-school social science texts. University of Illinois: Urbana, IL, USA.

[25] Crismore, A., 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. Peter Lang: New York, NY, USA.

[26] Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., Steffensen, M., 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication. 10, 39–71.

[27] Vande Kopple, W.J., 1985. Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication. 36(1), 82–93.

[28] Hyland, K., Tse, P., 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics. 25(2), 156–177.

[29] Ädel, A., 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[30] Salahshour, F., 2017. A ‘thick description’ genre analysis of death announcement notices. Science. 21(4), 99–110.

[31] Murrell, A.J., Jamie, K., Penfold-Mounce, R., 2023. ‘It was the easiest way to kind of announce it’: Exploring death announcements on social media through a dramaturgical lens. Mortality. 28(3), 411–428.

[32] Hyland, K., 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7(2), 173–192.

[33] Compulang, 2002. WordPilot (Version 1.6). Compulang: Hong Kong, China.

[34] Bondi, M., 1999. English Across Genres: Language Variation in the Discourse of Economics. Edizioni Il Fiorino: Modena, Italy.

[35] Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., et al., 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman: London, UK.

[36] Hyland, K., 1999. Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles. In: Candlin, C., Hyland, K. (Eds.). Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices. Longman: London, UK. pp. 99–121.

[37] Hyland, K., 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Longman: London, UK.

[38] Kuhi, D., Mojood, M., Branch, M., et al., 2012. A contrastive study of metadiscourse in English and Persian editorials. The Journal of Applied Linguistics. 5(1), 137–162.

[39] Zali, M.M., Mohamad, R., Setia, R., et al., 2020. Comparisons of interactive and interactional metadiscourse among undergraduates. Asian Journal of University Education. 16(4), 21–30.

[40] Binmahboob, T., 2022. The use of metadiscourse by Saudi and British authors: A focus on applied linguistics discipline. English Language Teaching. 15(2), 78–89.

[41] Kirişçi, D.I., Duruk, E., 2022. A comparative study of metadiscourse markers in the abstract sections of research articles written by Turkish and English researchers. Shanlax International Journal of Education. 10(4), 101–114.

[42] Soyşekerci, G., 2023. The appearance of metadiscourse markers in different text types [PhD thesis]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: İzmir, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

[43] Sadeghi, K., Esmaili, S., 2012. Frequency of textual metadiscourse resources (MTRs) in two original and simplified novels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 3(4), 1–10.

[44] Al-Jazrawi, D.A., Al-Jazrawi, Z.A., 2019. The use of meta-discourse: An analysis of interactive and interactional markers in English short stories as a type of literary genre. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 8(3), 66–77.

[45] Al-Jazrawi, D., Al-Jazrawi, Z., 2021. Metadiscourse as a way of achieving persuasion in literary criticism texts. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 21(3), 1–15.

[46] İşeri, K., Aydın-Öztürk, E., Soyşekerci, G., 2019. Metadiscourse markers in essay type texts. In: İşeri, K., Çapan Tekin, S., Aydın-Öztürk, E., et al. (Eds.). Current Debates in Linguistics. Dilbilim Derneği: Ankara, Türkiye. pp. 99–110. (in Turkish)

[47] Bondi, M., 2020. Academics online: Code glosses across research genres and public communication. In: Gotti, M., Mack, S., Sala, M. (Eds.). Scholarly Pathways: Knowledge Transfer and Knowledge Exchange in Academia. Peter Lang: Bern, Switzerland. pp. 57–82.

[48] Khedri, M., Heng, C.S., Ebrahimi, S.F., 2013. An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies. 15(3), 319–331.

[49] Özdemir, N.O., Longo, B., 2014. Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 141, 59–63.

[50] Wang, L., Zhang, Y., 2016. A study of metadiscourse features in English news reports. International Journal of Arts and Commerce. 5(6), 75–83.

[51] Mansouri, S., Najafabadi, M.M., Boroujeni, S.S., 2016. Metadiscourse in research article abstracts: A cross-lingual and disciplinary investigation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research. 3(4), 296–307.

[52] Şen, E., 2019. Examining metadiscourse markers in scientific article abstracts [PhD thesis]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: İzmir, Türkiye. (in Turkish)

[53] Dağ-Tarcan, Ö., 2017. Interactive metadiscourse markers in Turkish scientific texts. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 8(2), 176–194. (in Turkish)

[54] Şen, E., 2020. “I” and “We” in article abstracts: A metadiscourse analysis. International Journal of Language Academy. 8(1), 62–72. (in Turkish)

[55] Soyşekerci, G., Öztürk, E.A., İşeri, K., 2022. Metadiscourse markers in the conclusion sections of graduate theses. Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi. 7(2), 766–794. (in Turkish)

[56] Güçlü, R., 2025. The use of metadiscourse markers in L2 Turkish opinion texts by native Albanian students. Uluslararası Türkçe Öğretimi Araştırmaları Dergisi. 5(2), 288–316.

[57] Ahangari, S., Kazemi, M., 2014. A content analysis of ‘Alice in Wonderland’ regarding metadiscourse elements. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 3(3), 10–18.

[58] Esmaeili, S., 2020. Interactional metadiscourse resources in Oliver Twist. International Journal of English Linguistics. 10(6), 78–89.

[59] Hidayah, T.R.N.I., 2020. Metadiscourse analysis on Hamilton Wright Mabie’s fairy tales [PhD thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim: Malang, Indonesia.

[60] Rahmawati, Y.N., 2020. Interactive metadiscourse markers in horror story podcast [PhD thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim: Malang, Indonesia.

[61] Putri, A.N., Hastomo, T., Farhan, M., et al., 2023. A study of interaction and interactive metadiscourse on Ukraine–Russia conflict news articles. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literatures (JETALL). 6(1), 89–100.

[62] Khajavy, G.H., Asadpour, S.F., Yousefi, A., 2012. A comparative analysis of interactive metadiscourse features in discussion sections of research articles written in English and Persian. International Journal of Linguistics. 4(2), 147–159.

[63] Ghahremani-Mina, K., Biria, R., 2017. Exploring interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers in discussion sections of social and medical science articles. International Journal of Research in English Education. 2(4), 11–29.

[64] Farahani, M.V., Mohemmed, A.A., 2018. Metadiscourse in academic vs. nonacademic writing: A comparative corpus-driven inquiry. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies. 11(2), 145–166.

[65] Herriman, J., 2014. Metadiscourse in English and Swedish non-fiction texts and their translations. Nordic Journal of English Studies. 13(1), 1–32.

[66] Hamad, Z.H., Kareem, A.P.R.D., 2024. Investigation of the subtypes of transition markers of metadiscourse in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s simplified version The Scarlet Letter. The Islamic University College Journal. 79(2), 70–81.

[67] Al-Subhi, A.S., 2022. Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics. 187, 24–40.

[68] García-Calvo, J., 2002. Uses of metadiscourse in a research abstract for scientific events. Revista Letras. 57, 195–209.

[69] Pourmohammadi, M., Kuhi, D.D., 2016. A comparative analysis of self-mentions in applied linguistics PhD dissertations written by native and nonnative English writers. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances. 4(1), 109–124.

[70] Karimi, K., Maleki, M., Farnia, M., 2017. Metadiscourse markers in the abstract sections of Persian and English law articles. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 5(18), 69–83.

[71] Livingstone, K.A., 2019. Examining the use of metadiscourse markers in academic writing. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics. 5(3), 244–254.

[72] Musa, A., Hussin, S., Ho, I.A., 2019. Interaction in academic L2 writing: An analysis of interactional metadiscourse strategies in applied linguistics research articles. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 25 (3), 16–32. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-02

[73] Gong, H., Liu, L., Cao, F., 2023. A cross-linguistic study of interactional metadiscourse in English and Chinese research articles by the same Chinese scholars. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. 22(6), 542–558.

[74] Ahmadi, L., 2022. Interactional metadiscourse markers in scientific texts (based on research articles written by native and non-native speakers). Science Journal of Volgograd State University: Linguistics. 21(4), 99–110.

Downloads

How to Cite

Fidan, D., Aydın, E., & Soyşekerci, G. (2025). Contrastive Analysis of Metadiscourse Markers in English and Turkish Death Notices. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11830

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 12 (December 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Dilek Fidan, Esra Aydın, Gökha Soyşekerci

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.