Research on Risk and Care Evaluation in the Comment Corpus of E-Commerce Platforms

Authors

  • Qixiang Geng

    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China

  • Hongwei Lin

    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China

  • Xi Wang

    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China

    Centre of Sino-Western Cultural Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China

  • Shufang Zhao

    Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11858
Received: 29 August 2025 | Revised: 19 September 2025 | Accepted: 26 September 2025 | Published Online: 24 December 2025

Abstract

In the digital consumer ecosystem, online reviews for infant products serve as a critical locus for risk communication and caregiving identity construction. This study draws on a corpus of 11,435 consumer reviews of baby cribs collected from major Chinese e-commerce platforms to examine how parents linguistically articulate risk perceptions, evaluate product performance, and communicate caregiving concerns. Adopting a mixed-methods approach that combines Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling with manual qualitative coding, the analysis identifies five recurring discourse themes: Odor Risk, Safety Anxiety, Parental Responsibility, Emotional Externalization, and Esthetics & Design. The findings indicate that Odor Risk and Safety Anxiety constitute the most salient sources of parental concern. In particular, sensory cues such as smell, along with installation and assembly experiences, function as key indicators through which parents assess product reliability and potential safety hazards. These cues are frequently embedded in experiential narratives that describe inspection, mitigation, and evaluation processes. Beyond risk assessment, the analysis reveals a consistent narrative pattern in which parents negotiate a transition from initial apprehension to subsequent reassurance through specific discursive moves, including concessive structures and temporal sequencing. Importantly, online reviews are used not only to report product attributes but also to perform responsible parenting roles by demonstrating attentiveness, caution, and care. By foregrounding the interaction between sensory experience, risk evaluation, and affective stance, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of digital parenting discourse in high-involvement consumption contexts and highlights the social and communicative functions of online reviews in infant product markets.

Keywords:

Online Reviews; Parenting Discourse; Corpus-Based Study; Risk Communication

References

[1] Lowell, G., Cowles, N., Colvin, J.D., 2025. Baby products: How to evaluate them for potential safety. In Infant Safe Sleep: A Pocket Guide for Clinicians. pp. 267–293. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland.

[2] Zhang, C., Ye, P., Li, X., 2025. A corpus-based analysis of corporate apologies and public responses on Chinese social media. Journal of Pragmatics. 240, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.008

[3] Sun, Y., Yang, K., Chen, G., 2024. The research trends of corpus-assisted stance research (2004–2023): a systematic literature review. Current Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07130-x

[4] Yu, T., Pan, Y., Jang, W., 2025. Modeling Consumer Reactions to AI-Generated Content on E-Commerce Platforms: A Trust-Risk Dual Pathway Framework with Ethical and Platform Responsibility Moderators. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 20, 257–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20040257

[5] Hung, H.-Y., Hu, Y., Lee, N., et al., 2023. Exploring online consumer review-management response dynamics: A heuristic-systematic perspective. Decision Support Systems. 177, 114087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.114087

[6] Grubb, C., Young, J., Downer, T., D'Souza, L., 2025. Beyond the rules: an integrative review of parental perspectives on safer infant sleep in shared environments. Frontiers in Public Health. 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1629678

[7] Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Chen, X., Li, K., et al., 2024. The Impact of Consumer Sentiment on Sales of New Energy Vehicles: Evidence from Textual Analysis. World Electric Vehicle Journal. 15, 318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj15070318

[8] Lam, T., Heales, J., Hartley, N., 2023. The role of positive online reviews in risk-based consumer behaviours: an information processing perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management. 77, 282–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-03-2023-0102

[9] Du, X., Wei, Y., Zhang, F., et al., 2024. Wooden infant bed design under the background of two-child policy. BioResources. 19, 6076–6094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.3.6076-6094

[10] Roy, K., Paul, U.K., Tiwari, S., et al., 2025. Impact of electronic word of mouth (e-WOM) on purchasing decisions: an empirical study. Benchmarking: An International Journal. 32, 3901–3936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2024-0642

[11] Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D., 2006. The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research. 43, 345–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345

[12] Yin, J., Li, T., Ni, Y., et al., 2025. Exploring how generativity influences the online review continuity of museums: the double-edged sword of monetary rewards. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.10.1080/10941665.2025.2486031

[13] Häubl, G., Trifts, V., 2000. Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids. Marketing Science. 19, 4–21.

[14] Ariely, D., 2000. Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research. 27, 233–248.

[15] Feng, M., Feng, Y., Li, Y., 2023. Online Reviews, Customer Q&As, and Product Sales: A PVAR Approach. PLOS ONE. 18, e0290674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290674

[16] Martin, H., Manohar, R., Ellis, L., et al., 2025. Emotional and Cognitive Landscape of Perceived Risk: Anxiety, Caution, and Financial Loss in Shaping Safety Decisions Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management—ASCE. 151(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-16648

[17] Sporrer, J.K., Johann, A., Chumbley, J., et al., 2024. Induced worry increases risk aversion in patients with generalized anxiety. Behavioural Brain Research. 474, 115192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2024.115192

[18] Hallikainen, H., Halinen, M., Tervonen, H., et al., 2024. Rating with the senses: How sensory encounters are reflected on online review ratings? Psychology and Marketing. 42(1), 159–174. DOI: https://doi.com/10.1002/mar.22119

[19] Shashank, S., Behera, R.K., 2024. Factors influencing recommendations for women's clothing satisfaction: A latent dirichlet allocation approach using online reviews. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 81, 104011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104011

[20] Elo, S., Kyngäs, H., 2008. The Qualitative Content Analysis Process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 62(1), 107–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

[21] Du, Y., Reynolds, B.L., 2025. Exploring interaction process, L2 motivation and intended effort in chatbot-mediated interactions: evidence from Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2552116

Downloads

How to Cite

Geng, Q., Lin, H., Wang, X., & Zhao, S. (2025). Research on Risk and Care Evaluation in the Comment Corpus of E-Commerce Platforms. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 1915–1929. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11858