Metaphorical Framing of Natural Disasters in Media Discourse

Authors

  • Assel Tanatkanovna Nurgazina

    Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Akhmet Baitursynuly Kostanay Regional University, Kostanay 110000, Kazakhstan
  • Natalya Viktorovna Mongilyova

    Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Akhmet Baitursynuly Kostanay Regional University, Kostanay 110000, Kazakhstan
  • Gulnar Kulmukhambetovna Ismagulova

    Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.12127
Received: 16 September 2025 | Revised: 5 October 2025 | Accepted: 10 October 2025 | Published Online: 12 November 2025

Abstract

Amidst escalating climate threats and the increasing frequency of natural disasters, media discourse has become a central arena for shaping public risk perception, mobilization strategies, and collective responses. Metaphor serves as a key cognitive and discursive instrument for meaning construction, framing interpretation, and embedding culturally resonant models of perception. The analysis of metaphorical framing provides insight into the mechanisms of crisis communication, environmental rhetoric, and collective sense-making. This study examines and systematizes metaphorical frames in English-language media discourse on natural disasters. The corpus comprises BBC and Voice of America texts (2023–2024) covering wildfires and floods, thus enabling a symmetrical comparison of British and American media ecosystems. The theoretical foundation integrates conceptual metaphor theory, frame semantics, critical discourse analysis, and Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA). The methodology combines corpus-based procedures (frequency, collocational, and contextual analysis in AntConc) with the MIPVU protocol for metaphor identification, ensuring reliability through corpus symmetry and inter-annotator verification. The study introduces the concept of a “frame index” – a quantitative metric for assessing metaphorical intensity thereby expanding the methodological repertoire of cognitive-discursive analysis. The research aims to identify the dominant types of metaphorical framing of natural disasters, describe their cognitive-discursive functions, and trace their variation across media platforms and disaster types. The findings contribute to the advancement of cognitive linguistics and media discourse analysis and hold practical value for enhancing environmental communication, media education, and editorial standards in reporting climate risks.

Keywords:

Metaphorical Framing; Media Discourse; Cognitive-Discursive Analysis; Environmental Communication; Corpus-Based Analysis

References

[1] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001

[2] Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001

[3] Fillmore, C.J., 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Hanshin: Seoul, South Korea. pp. 111–137.

[4] Goffman, E., 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA.

[5] Entman, R.M., 1993. Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication. 43(4), 51–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

[6] Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (Eds.)., 2015. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed. SAGE: London, UK.

[7] van Dijk, T.A., 2020. Critical Discourse Studies: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[8] van Dijk, T.A., 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[9] Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman: Harlow, UK.

[10] Charteris-Black, J., 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612

[11] Hart, C., 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.

[12] Koller, V., Semino, E., 2009. Metaphor, Politics and Gender: A Case Study from Germany. In: Ahrens, K. (Ed.). Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 9–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245235_2

[13] Hauser, D.J., Fleming, M.E., 2021. Mother Nature’s Fury: Antagonist Metaphors for Natural Disasters Increase Forecasts of Their Severity and Encourage Evacuation. Science Communication. 43(5), 570–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470211031246

[14] Vinnell, L.J., Milfont, T.L., McClure, J., 2023. Natural Hazard Versus Natural Disaster: Does Framing the Event Affect Preparedness Intentions, Attitudes, and Behaviour? Social Psychological Bulletin. 18, e8357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.8357

[15] Depoux, A., Hémono, M., Puig-Malet, S., et al., 2017. Communicating Climate Change and Health in the Media. Public Health Reviews, 38, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-016-0044-1

[16] Badullovich, N., Grant, W.J., Colvin, R.M., 2020. Framing Climate Change for Effective Communication: A Systematic Map. Environmental Research Letters. 15(12), 123002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba4c7

[17] Blankshain, J.D., Glick, D.M., Lupton, D.L., 2022. War Metaphors (What Are They Good For?): Militarized Rhetoric and Attitudes Toward Essential Workers During the Covid-19 Pandemic. American Politics Research. 51(2), 161–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X221125713

[18] Musolff, A., 2022. “World-beating” Pandemic Responses: Ironical, Sarcastic, and Satirical Use of War and Competition Metaphors in the Context of COVID-19 Pandemic. Metaphor and Symbol. 37(2), 76–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1932505

[19] Semino, E., 2021. “Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters”: Metaphors and COVID-19. Health Communication. 36(1), 50–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989

[20] Brugman, B.C., Droog, E., Reijnierse, W.G., et al., 2022. Audience Perceptions of COVID-19 Metaphors: The Role of Source Domain and Country Context. Metaphor and Symbol. 37(2), 101–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2021.1948332

[21] Feifei, F., 2024. Analyzing Metaphor Patterns in Covid-19 News Pictures: A Critical Study in China. PLoS ONE. 19(2), e0297336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297336

[22] Groff, S.P., 2021. Magnifying Focusing Events: Global Smoke Plumes and International Construal Connections in Newspaper Coverage of 2020 Wildfire Events. Frontiers in Communication. 6, 713591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.713591

[23] Shellington, E.M., Nguyen, P.D.M., Rideout, K., et al., 2022. Public Health Messaging for Wildfire Smoke: Cast a Wide Net. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 773428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.773428

[24] Karyotakis, M.-A., Lo, K., 2024. The Political Ecology of Wildfire: Media and the Politics of Blame in the Evros Wildfires in Greece. Trees, Forests and People. 18, 100682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100682

[25] Jacobson, M., Smith, H., Huber-Stearns, H.R., et al., 2021. Comparing Social Constructions of Wildfire Risk across Media, Government, and Participatory Discourse in a Colorado Fireshed. Journal of Risk Research. 25(6), 697–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1962954

[26] Dasandi, N., Graham, H., Hudson, D., 2022. Global Health and Environmental Framing Bolster Support for Climate Policies. Communications Earth & Environment. 3, 239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00571-x

[27] Torricelli, M., Falkenberg, M., Galeazzi, A., 2023. How does Extreme Weather Impact the Climate Change Discourse? Insights from the Twitter Discussion on Hurricanes. PLOS Climate. 2(11), e0000277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000277

[28] Vikström, S., Mervaala, E., Kangas, H.-L., et al., 2023. Framing Climate Futures: The Media Representations of Climate and Energy Policies in Finnish Broadcasting Company News. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences. 20(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2023.2178464

[29] Cody, E.M., Stephens, J.C., Bagrow, J.P., et al, 2017. Transitions in Climate and Energy Discourse Between Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 7(1), 87–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-016-0391-8

[30] Cox, R.S., Long, B.C., Jones, M.I., et al., 2008. Sequestering of Suffering: Critical Discourse Analysis of Natural Disaster Media Coverage. Journal of Health Psychology. 13(4), 469–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308088518

[31] Stecula, D.A., Borah, P., 2019. Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014. Frontiers in Communication. 4, 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00006

[32] Chouliaraki, L., 2010. Post-Humanitarianism: Humanitarian Communication Beyond a Politics of Pity. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 13(2), 107–126. Available from: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29265/1/Post-humanitarianism (LSERO).pdf

[33] Koteyko, N., Atanasova, D., 2016. Discourse Analysis in Climate Change Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.489

[34] Günay, D., Yenen Aytekin, Ö., Melek, G., 2025. Visual Framing of Climate Change During Natural Disasters at Home and Abroad: An Analysis of British News. Visual Communication. 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572251320304

[35] Zhunussova, G., Tajik, M.A., Fillipova, L., et al., 2023. “I am a Mixed Person of Kazakh, Turkish and English”: Multilingual Students’ Identity in EMI Universities in Kazakhstan. System. 119, 103159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103159

[36] Gusarov, D., 2023. Kazakhstan 2022 Presidential Elections in German Media: Critical Discourse Analysis. SSRN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4466157

[37] Abdyzhaparova, M.I., 2021. Man and Nature, Man and History in Metaphors of Aipin’s Historical Novel. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 18(1), 488–495. Available from: https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3491

[38] Beknazarova, U.U., Almautova, A.B., Yelemessova, S.M., et al., 2021. The Cognitive Function of a Conceptual Metaphor and Its Methodological Foundations. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 17(3), 1312–1324. Available from: https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3147

[39] Taussogarova, A., Tuzelbayeva, D., Bektemirova, S., et al., 2024. Kazakh Gluttonous Discourse Analysis of ‘Bas Tartu’ & ‘Tabak Tartu’: Conceptual Image and Institutional Function. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10(1), 127–138. Available from: https://ejal.info/menuscript/index.php/ejal/article/view/694/235

[40] Sagadiyeva, Z., Satenova, S., Yeskindirova, M., et al., 2021. Political Discourse: The Translation Aspect. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 17(3), 1615–1627. Available from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/64393/981042

[41] Mussaly, L.Z., Daurenbekova, L.N., Seidenova, S.D., et al., 2021. Influence of Symbolism in World Literature on the Kazakh Poets’ Creativity. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 18(1), 447–457. Available from: https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/3499

[42] Lakoff, G., Turner, M., 1989. More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.

Downloads

How to Cite

Nurgazina, A. T., Mongilyova, N. V., & Ismagulova, G. K. (2025). Metaphorical Framing of Natural Disasters in Media Discourse. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.12127

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 12 (December 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Assel Tanatkanovna Nurgazina, Natalya Viktorovna Mongilyova, Gulnar Kulmukhambetovna Ismagulova

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.