Vietnamese EFL high school teachers' perceptions of difficulties when implementing competency-based English teaching curriculum and their proposed solutions

Authors

  • Thi Anh Nguyen

    Can Tho University
  • Thao Thanh Le

    Can Tho University
  • Mai Dong Vang

    Can Tho University
  • Yen Hoang Phuong

    Can Tho University
  • Thu Thi Anh Huynh

    Can Tho University
  • Tra Huong Nguyen

    Can Tho University
  • Thuy Trut Pham

    Nam Can Tho University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i2.1863

Abstract

This study aims to examine the perceptions of Vietnamese English as a foreign language (EFL) high school teachers regarding the implementation of the competency-based English teaching curriculum (CETC) in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam. Utilizing a qualitative approach, this study sought to delve into the challenges high school EFL teachers faced while implementing the CETC in Vietnam. Semi-structured interviews with 10 teachers were conducted to gain insights into their experiences, specifically targeting their perceptions of difficulties and their suggestions for potential solutions derived from these experiences. The findings reveal teachers' perceptions of their perceived difficulties related to student-related factors (low English proficiency, and limited self-directed learning abilities), teacher-related factors (traditional teaching methods, inadequate language and pedagogical skills, and insufficient training), and institution-related factors (large class sizes, limited teaching time, and inadequate facilities). In addition, the teachers recommended strategic solutions for a better implementation of the CETC including providing constructive feedback, promoting collaborative learning, enhancing teachers’ language and pedagogical proficiency, reducing class sizes, and improving facilities. Accordingly, the study contributes to the understanding of CETC implementation and provides practical implications for teachers, students, and policymakers in Vietnam and other similar contexts.

Keywords:

competency-based language curriculum, difficulties, EFL, implementation, perceptions, suggestions

References

[1] Abraham M, Arficho Z, Habtemariam T, Demissie A (2022). Effects of information communication technology-assisted teaching training on English language teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and English language proficiency. Cogent Education 9(1): 2028336. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2028336

[2] Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Olenik NL (2021). Research and scholarly methods: Semi-structured interviews. Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy 4(10): 1358–1367. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1441

[3] Apple MT, Falout J, Hill G (2020). The relationship between future career self images and English achievement test scores of Japanese STEM students. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 63(4): 372–385. doi: 10.1109/TPC.2020.3029662

[4] Aslam R, Khan N (2020). Constructive feedback and students’ academic achievement: A theoretical framework. New Horizons 14(2): 175–198. doi: 10.2.9270/NH.14.2(20).10

[5] Bajis D, Chaar B, Moles R (2020). Rethinking competence: A nexus of educational models in the context of lifelong learning. Pharmacy 8(2): 81. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8020081

[6] Barhate B, Dirani KM (2022). Career aspirations of generation Z: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development 46(1/2): 139–157. doi: 10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124

[7] Batubara F, Derin T, Putri NS, Yudar RS (2020). Five factors influencing the students’ motivation to learn English as a foreign language: A closer look into Montessori classroom environment. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language 2(2): 76–84. doi: 10.31849/reila.v2i2.3165

[8] Bemmoussat ND, Bouyakoub N (2019). English language education in Algeria: Hostage of an exam-centric education system. Arab World English Journal 10(3): 202–219. doi: 10.24093/awej/vol10no3.14

[9] Blatchford P (2003). The Class Size Debate: Is Small Better? McGraw-Hill Education.

[10] Blatchford P, Russell A (2019). Class size, grouping practices and classroom management. International Journal of Educational Research 96: 154–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.004

[11] Boss S, Larmer J (2018). Project Based Teaching: How to Create Rigorous and Engaging Learning Experiences. ASCD.

[12] Braun V, Clarke V (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health 24(1): 1–6. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

[13] Butler YG, Peng X, Lee J (2021). Young learners’ voices: Towards a learner-centered approach to understanding language assessment literacy. Language Testing 38(3): 429–455. doi: 10.1177/0265532221992274

[14] Camacho DJ, Legare JM (2016). Shifting gears in the classroom—Movement toward personalized learning and competency-based education. Competency-based Education 1(4): 151–156. doi: 10.1002/cbe2.1032

[15] Cao CD, Vu HTT, Nguyen TT, Nguyen HT (2022). Teaching according to the competency-based at technical pedagogical universities. The Open Psychology Journal 15(1). doi: 10.2174/18743501-v15-e221129-2022-29

[16] Cao PTH (2018). Task-based language teaching: Affordances and challenges in TBLT implementation at the Vietnamese tertiary level. Journal of Asia TEFL 15(2): 510–515. doi: 10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.19.510

[17] Chacko TV (2014). Moving toward competency-based education: Challenges and the way forward. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences 2(2): 247. doi: 10.4103/2321-4848.144365

[18] Charmaz K (2017). Constructivist grounded theory. The Journal of Positive Psychology 12(3): 299–300. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262612

[19] Creswell JW, Poth CN (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage.

[20] Dao H, Newton J (2021). TBLT perspectives on teaching from an EFL textbook at a Vietnam university. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 24(2): 99–126. doi: 10.37213/cjal.2021.31371

[21] Do TTT, Sellars M, Le TT (2022). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam’s disadvantaged areas: Implementation barriers. Education Sciences 12(7): 445. doi: 10.3390/educsci12070445

[22] Duong BH, DeJaeghere J (2022). From student-centered to competency-based reform: Exploring teachers’ perspective of meaningful participation. RISE Working Paper Series. 22/089. RISE. doi: 10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2022/089

[23] Egbert JL, Shahrokini SA (2019). Balancing old and new: Integrating competency-based learning into CALL teacher education. JALT CALL Journal 15(1): 3–18. doi: 10.29140/jaltcall.v15n1.156

[24] Evans CM, Landl E, Thompson J (2020). Making sense of K-12 competency-based education: A systematic literature review of implementation and outcomes research from 2000 to 2019. The Journal of Competency-Based Education 5(4): e01228. doi: 10.1002/cbe2.1228

[25] Fernández-Batanero JM, Montenegro-Rueda M, Fernández-Cerero J, García-Martínez I (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education 45(4): 513–531. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

[26] Glaser BG, Holton J, Strauss AL, et al. (2007). Grounded Theory Reader. Zentrum für Historische Sozialforschung.

[27] Griffith WI, Lim HY (2014). Introduction to competency-based language teaching. MEXTESOL Journal 38(2): 1–8.

[28] Gulzar MS (2014). Teachers’ code-switching in a content-focused English as a second language (ESL) classroom: Patterns and functions. International Journal of Linguistics 6(4): 130–153. doi: 10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6162

[29] Hang NVT, Meijer MR, Bulte AM, Pilot A (2015). The implementation of a social constructivist approach in primary science education in Confucian heritage culture: The case of Vietnam. Cultural Studies of Science Education 10(3): 665–693. doi: 10.1007/s11422-014-9634-8

[30] Hanifa R (2018). Factors generating anxiety when learning EFL speaking skills. Studies in English Language and Education 5(2): 230–239. doi: 10.24815/siele.v5i2.10932

[31] Harris L, Dargusch J, Ames K, Bloomfield C (2022). Catering for ‘very different kids’: Distance education teachers’ understandings of and strategies for student engagement. International Journal of Inclusive Education 26(8): 848–864. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2020.1735543

[32] Heritage M, Walqui A, Linquanti R (2020). English Language Learners and the New Standards: Developing Language, Content Knowledge, and Analytical Practices in the Classroom. Harvard Education Press.

[33] Hien TTT, Loan MT (2018). Current challenges in the teaching of tertiary English in Vietnam. In: Albright A (editor). English Tertiary Education in Vietnam. Routledge. pp. 40–53.

[34] Ho J (2020). Gamifying the flipped classroom: How to motivate Chinese ESL learners? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 14(5): 421–435. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2019.1614185

[35] Hodge S, Mavin T, Kearns S (2020). Hermeneutic dimensions of competency-based education and training. Vocations and Learning 13: 27–46. doi: 10.1007/s12186-019-09227-y

[36] Hung BP (2019). Meaningful learning and its implications for language education in Vietnam. Journal of Language and Education 5(1): 98–102. doi: 10.17323/2411-7390-2019-5-1-98-102

[37] Hung DM, Thuy PT (2021). Reflective teaching perceived and practiced by EFL teachers––A case in the south of Vietnam. International Journal of Instruction 14(2): 323–344. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14219a

[38] Huong LTT, Quynh NTT, Ngoc NT, Duc NM (2021). Applying the lesson study model in developing teaching capability for young teachers in Vietnam. European Journal of Educational Research 10(4): 1755–1768. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1755

[39] Hyland K, Hyland F (2019). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press.

[40] Kashefian-Naeeini S, Aminlari F, Mousavi H (2018). An investigation into attitudes towards learning English and the motivation type (integrative vs. instrumental) in Iranian students at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies 6(3): 204–213.

[41] Khalil AH, El-Nagar BEDE, Awad MAEM (2019). The effect of brain-based learning on developing some speaking skills of Egyptian EFL secondary school students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education 14(3): 103–116.

[42] Kibler AK, Karam FJ, Futch Ehrlich VA, et al. (2018). Who are ‘long-term English learners’? Using classroom interactions to deconstruct a manufactured learner label. Applied Linguistics 39(5): 741–765. doi: 10.1093/applin/amw039

[43] Kim D (2020). Learning language, learning culture: Teaching language to the whole student. ECNU Review of Education 3(3): 519–541. doi: 10.1177/2096531120936693

[44] Koh JHL, Chai CS, Lim WY (2017). Teacher professional development for TPACK-21CL: Effects on teacher ICT integration and student outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research 55(2): 172–196. doi: 10.1177/0735633116656848

[45] Kong SC, Lai M (2023). Effects of a teacher development program on teachers’ knowledge and collaborative engagement, and students’ achievement in computational thinking concepts. British Journal of Educational Technology 54(2): 489–512. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13256

[46] Kostere S, Kostere K (2021). The Generic Qualitative Approach to a Dissertation in the Social Sciences: A Step by Step Guide. Routledge.

[47] Le TN, Allen B, Johnson NF (2022). Blended learning: Barriers and drawbacks for English language lecturers at Vietnamese universities. E-Learning and Digital Media 19(2): 225–239. doi: 10.1177/20427530211048235

[48] Le TT, Chen S (2018). Globalisation and Vietnamese foreign language education. In: Albright A (editor). English Tertiary Education in Vietnam. Routledge. pp. 16–27.

[49] Le XM, Le TT (2022). Factors affecting students’ attitudes towards learning English as a foreign language in a tertiary institution of Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education 2(2): 168–185. doi: 10.54855/ijte.22229

[50] Le XM, Phuong HY, Le TT (2023). The impact of demographic information on students’ preferable extracurricular activities for English learning. International Journal of Education and Practice 11(3): 425–438. doi: 10.18488/61.v11i3.3386

[51] Linake MA (2021). Reading culture in English first additional language at intermediate phase. In: EDULEARN21 Proceedings, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies; 5–6 July 2021; Online Conference. IATED. pp. 5178–5187. doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2021.1067

[52] MacCallum K, Day S, Skelton D, Verhaart M (2017). Mobile affordances and learning theories in supporting and enhancing learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL) 9(2): 61–73. doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.2017040104

[53] Mai C (2016). Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions about Teaching Speaking at High School in Vietnam [PhD thesis]. University of New South Wales.

[54] Mai LX, Thao LT (2022). English language teaching pedagogical reforms in Vietnam: External factors in light of teachers’ backgrounds. Cogent Education 9(1): 2087457. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2022.2087457

[55] Manuas M (2022). Involving English extracurricular activities to improve students’ speaking skills. Journal of English Language Teaching, Literature and Culture 1(1): 14–27. doi: 10.2503/jeltec.v1i1.3721

[56] Ministry of Education and Training (MOET, 2008). Project document for implementing advanced programs in some Vietnamese universities in the period 2008–2015 (Vietnamese). Available online: https://luatminhkhue.vn/en/decision-no-1505-qd-ttg-dated-october-14--2008-of-the-prime-minister-approving-the-scheme-on-the-implementation-of-advanced-training-programs-at-a-number-of-vietnamese-universities-in-the-2008-2015-period.aspx (accessed on 24 August 2023).

[57] Moore PJ, Nguyen GH, Nguyen QV (2023). Professional standards in CALL teacher training in Vietnam: Towards an ecological approach to CALL integration. In: Tafazoli D, Picard M (editors). Handbook of CALL Teacher Education and Professional Development: Voices from Under-Represented Contexts. Springer Nature Singapore. pp. 463–481. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0514-0_27

[58] Morgenroth T, Ryan MK, Peters K (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals. Review of General Psychology 19(4): 465–483. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000059

[59] Nashruddin W, Nurrachman D (2016). The implementation of lesson study in English language learning: A case study. Dinamika Ilmu 16(2): 169–179. doi: 10.21093/di.v16i2.356

[60] Nguyen HN, Nguyen DK (2022). Vietnamese learners’ performance in the IELTS writing task 2: Problems, causes, and suggestions. International Journal of TESOL & Education 2(1): 170–189. doi: 10.54855/ijte.222111

[61] Nguyen T (2018). Implementation of English flipped classrooms: Students’ perceptions and teacher’s reflection. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 7(3): 87–108. doi: 10.5861/ijrsll.2017.1876

[62] Nguyen TA, Nguyen LT, Vo AP (2023). Vietnamese EFL secondary school teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching. Language Related Research 14(1): 89–112. doi: 10.52547/LRR.14.1.4

[63] Nguyen TD (2022). Integration of ICT in Teaching English as A Foreign Language at A Private University in Southeast Vietnam [PhD thesis]. Queensland University of Technology.

[64] Phan TKT (2023). Revisiting lifelong learning and its practices in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education 3(1): 47–63. doi: 10.54855/ijte.23314

[65] Phan TTH (2011). Factors Affecting the Motivation of Vietnamese Technical English Majors in Their English Studies [PhD thesis]. University of Otago.

[66] Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, et al. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education 3(3): 715–742. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1

[67] Saito K, Suzukida Y, Sun H (2019). Aptitude, experience, and second language pronunciation proficiency development in classroom settings: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41(1): 201–225. doi: 10.1017/S0272263117000432

[68] Sallang H, Ling YL (2019). The importance of immediate constructive feedback on students’ instrumental motivation in speaking in English. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal 1(2): 1–7. doi: 10.33258/biolae.v1i2.58

[69] Sippel L (2019). The impact of peer corrective feedback on vocabulary development. Foreign Language Annals 52(3): 595–611. doi: 10.1111/flan.12416

[70] Taghizadeh M, Hasani Yourdshahi Z (2020). Integrating technology into young learners’ classes: Language teachers’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning 33(8): 982–1006. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1618876

[71] Taguchi N, Roever C (2017). Second Language Pragmatics. Oxford.

[72] Thanh PTH (2010). Implementing a student-centered learning approach at Vietnamese higher education institutions: Barriers under layers of casual layered analysis (CLA). Journal of Futures Studies 15(1): 21–38.

[73] Thao DP, Boyd WA (2014). Renovating early childhood education pedagogy: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of Early Years Education 22(2): 184–196. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2014.909306

[74] Thao LT, Mai LX (2020). English language teaching reforms in Vietnam: EFL teachers’ perceptions of their responses and the influential factors. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 16(1): 29–40. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2020.1846041

[75] Thohir L (2017). Motivation in a foreign language teaching and learning. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning 6(1): 20–29. doi: 10.21580/vjv6i11580

[76] Tieocharoen W, Rimkeeratikul S (2019). Learning strategies and teaching methods in Thai and Vietnamese universities. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 10(3): 99–112. doi: 10.24093/awej/vol10no3.7

[77] Tong DH, Uyen BP, Ngan LK (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon 8(12): e12657. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

[78] Toro LV, Pinza EI, Vargas AB, et al. (2019). Teachers and students’ perceptions of teaching and learning English in small classes: A case of Ecuador. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 18(1): 95–104.

[79] Tran CDTT (2021). Cost efficiency—One size fits all? A university-level analysis of economies of scale and scope in Vietnamese higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 41(2): 336–355. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1735996

[80] Tran PM, Tanemura K (2020). English in Vietnam. World Englishes 39(3): 528–541. doi: 10.1111/weng.12489

[81] Tweedy L (2012). Discovering Factors that Influence English Pronunciation of Native Vietnamese Speakers [PhD thesis]. Hamline University.

[82] Van Canh L (2020). Remapping the teacher knowledge-base of language teacher education: A Vietnamese perspective. Language Teaching Research 24(1): 71–81. doi: 10.1177/1362168818777525

[83] Van Ha X, Tran NG, Tran NH (2021). Teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding assessment in English as a foreign language classroom in Vietnam. The Qualitative Report 26(11): 3457–3475. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5063

[84] Vongxay H (2013). The Implementation of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in an English Department in a Lao Higher Educational Institution: A Case Study [Master’s thesis]. Unitec Institute of Technology.

[85] Vu UTM (2020). The Effects of Sociocultural and Educational Supports on Resilience and Learning Outcomes among Vietnamese Undergraduate Students [PhD thesis]. University of Hawai’i at Manoa.

[86] Waddington J (2021). Assessment for learning, learning for all: A case study in the foreign language classroom. In: Rokita-Jaśkow J, Wolanin A (editors). Facing Diversity in Child Foreign Language Education. Springer International Publishing. pp. 157–178. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-66022-2_9

[87] Windschitl M (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Researcher 72: 131–175. doi: 10.3102/00346543072002131

[88] Wragg N, Barnes C, Haig A, et al. (2022). Designing pedagogical change: Fostering creativity in communication design education by removing grades. Journal of Design, Business & Society 9(1): 57–78. doi: 10.1386/dbs_00046_1

[89] Yao Y, Guo NS, Wang W, Yu J (2021). Measuring Chinese junior high school students’ language mindsets: What can we learn from young EFL learners’ beliefs in their language ability? System 101: 102577. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102577

[90] Yu R (2020). On fostering learner autonomy in learning English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 10(11): 1414–1419. doi: 10.17507/tpls.1011.09

[91] Yukselturk E, Altıok S, Başer Z (2018). Using game-based learning with kinect technology in foreign language education course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21(3): 159–173.

[92] Yulia MF, Sulistyo GH, Cahyono BY (2020). Affective engagement in academic reading: What EFL student teachers reveal. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 9(3): 791–798. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20635

[93] Zou D, Xie H (2018). Personalized word-learning based on technique feature analysis and learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21(2): 233–244.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 5 , Iss. 2 (September 2023)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2023 Thi Anh Nguyen, Thao Thanh Le, Mai Dong Vang, Yen Hoang Phuong, Thu Thi Anh Huynh, Tra Huong Nguyen, Thuy Trut Pham

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.