Generic structure and APPRAISAL resources in the editorial article Free money

Authors

  • Zedong Zhao

    School of English for International Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
  • Chunyu Hu

    School of English for International Business, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18063/fls.v3i1.1246

Abstract

Editorial is one of news genres aiming for opinion making and persuading. These functions determine that there are abundant evaluative resources in this genre. Exploring evaluative resources in the editorial could be conducive to understanding editorial text better and providing sensible suggestions for English learners to produce effectively persuasive writings. In view of this, the present study sets out to analyze the generic structure of the editorial Free money, then examine usage patterns of APPRAISAL resources in this text, and finally explore variations of APPRAISAL resources at different stages of the genre of this text. All APPRAISAL resources were coded based on APPRAISAL system and analyzed from quantitative and qualitative perspectives. It shows that Free money employed discussion genre with exposition and challenge embedded in the Background stage. An investigation into the usage of APPRAISAL resources found that negative ATTITUDE resources were mainly used to form the prosody of the text; more negation and concession resources within ENGAGEMENT were deployed to contract the dialogue; far more force raising GRADUATION resources were applied to amplify the evaluation. The APPRAISAL resources used at different stages of the editorial demonstrate distinct features with the aim of serving specific function of each stage. For instance, attribution resources were used in Issue stage to expand the dialogue and engage the readers; invoked resources were primarily employed in Background stage to make the statement objective; far more negative impressions in Side stage indicated the author's concern, and more inscribed resources in Resolution stage manifested author's attitude and made the conclusion impressive.

Keywords:

Genre Theory, APPRAISAL system, editorial article

References

Bonyadi A (2010) The rhetorical properties of the schematic structures of newpaper editorials: A comparative study of English and Persian editorials. Discourse & Communication 4(4): 323–342.

Cheng HM (2008) The construction of writer-reader interaction in English editorial discourse: An appraisal approach. MSc Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan.

Fink CC (2004) Writing Opinion for Impact (2nd ed.). Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

Fox CW and Burns CS (2015) The relationship between manuscript title structure and success: Editorial decisions and citation performance for an ecological journal. Ecology and Evaluation 5(10): 1970–1980.

Halliday MAK (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday MAK and Matthiessen C (1999) Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London and New York: Continuum.

Halliday MAK and Matthiessen C (2014) Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

Liu L (2009) Discourse construction of social power: Interpersonal rhetoric in editorials of the China Daily. Discourse Studies 11(1): 59–78.

Liu S (2008) A contrastive analysis of editorials in Chinese and English. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Social Sciences) 9(6): 49–53.

Martin JR (2000) Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English. In: Hunston S and Thompson G (eds) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martin JR (2010) Semantic variation: Modelling system, text and affiliation in social semiosis. In: Bednarek M and Martin JR (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London and New York: Continuum.

Martin JR (2016) One of three traditions: Genre, functional linguistics, and the ‘Sydney School’. In: Artemeva N and Freedman A (eds) Genre around the Globe: Beyond the Three Traditions. Edmonton: Trafford.

Martin JR and Rose D (2007) Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London and New York: Continuum.

Martin JR and Rose D (2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London and Oakvill: Equinox.

Martin JR and White P (2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Newsom D and Wollert JA (1985) Media Writing: News for the Mass Media. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

O’Donnell M (2014) Exploring identity through Appraisal analysis: A corpus annotation methodology. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 9: 95–116.

Peng R (2009) Research on the intertextuality in the titles of the New Year Editorials. Journal of Language and Literature Studies 2: 47–49.

Ran Z (2012) On discursive construction of power in Chinese and English editorials: A perspective for attitude resources. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Social Sciences) 26(3): 59–65.

Ungerer F (1997) Emotions and emotional language in English and German news stories. In: Niemeier S and Dirven R (eds) The Language of Emotions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

White P (2012) Affinity, affiliation, alignment, bonding, communality, identity, individuation, persona, power, rapport and solidarity in mass communicative discourse. Paper presented in the Friday Afternoon linguistics seminars, University of Sydney, 27 April 2012. Available at: http://www.socialsemiotics.org/vids/peter2PRES/.

White PRR (2002) Appraisal: The language of evaluation and stance. In: Verschueren J, Östman J, Blommaert J, et al. (eds) The Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Zhang W (2003) Comparative Journalism: Methodology and Case Studies. Guangzhou: South Daily Publisher.

Zhao M (2014) Distribution of appraisal resources in English newspaper editorial texts: An SFL-based analysis. PhD Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai.

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 3 , Iss. 1 (September 2021)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2021 Zedong Zhao, Chunyu Hu

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.