-
1968
-
1141
-
812
-
616
-
601
The cognitive-functional properties of English WH-dialogic constructions in discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18063/fls.v1i1.1080Abstract
Within the theoretical frameworks of cognitive linguistics and cognitive construction grammar, this paper takes the pair of a WH-question and one of its answers in contemporary spoken English as the research object and regards such pairs as WH-dialogic constructions. In this study we construct an Event-based Schema-Instance Cognitive Model (ESI model) to analyze the cognitive-functional properties of this category of dialogic constructions. The discoursal expansion and textual cohesion in discourse achieved through the application of such dialogic constructions indicate that the usage of WH-dialogic constructions is one of the basic cognitive strategies for human beings to construe the objective world.
Keywords:
WH-dialogic constructions; event; schema-instance principle; cognitive modelReferences
Baugh AC and Cable T (1978) A history of the English Language (3rd ed.). London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Brône G and Zima E (2014) Towards a dialogic construction grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 457–495.
Chomsky N (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky N (2013) Problems of projection. Lingua (130): 33–49.
Croft W and Cruse DA (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: CUP, pp.257–258.
Davies M (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.
Du Bois JW (2014) Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3): 359–410.
Ginzburg J and Sag I (2000) Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning and Use of English Interrogatives. CSLI Publications, pp.185.
Goldberg AE (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, pp.4.
Goldberg AE (2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP, pp.3,177.
Hamblin CL (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10(1): 41–43.
Halliday MAK (1994) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold, pp.45–46.
Langacker RW (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp.371.
Langacker RW (1991) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. II: Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, pp.505–506.
Langacker RW (2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP, pp.457,466.
Langacker RW (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Gramma. Mouton de Gruyter, pp.235.
Lehnert W (1997) Human and computational question answering. Cognitive Science (1): 37–73.
Taylor J (1989) Linguistic Categorization—Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: OUP, pp.59.
Taylor J (2002) Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP, pp.125.
Thomson AJ and Martinet AV (1986) A Practical English Grammar. Oxford: OUP, pp.71–74.
Zeng G (2015) A cognitive approach to the event structures of grammatical constructions. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University (1): 38–42.
Zeng G (2016) A cognitive approach to the event structures of WH-dialogic constructions. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies (4): 311–324.
Zeng G (2018a) Book review: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Discourse Studies (6): 813–815.
Zeng G (2018b) The dialogic turn in cognitive linguistics studies: From minimalism, maximalism to dialogicalism. Cogent Education (Taylor & Francis) (5): 1537907. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1537907.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2019 Guocai Zeng
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.