You are Under Arrest: Language Use for Social Power Construction in Institutional Discourse

Authors

  • God'sgift Ogban Uwen

    Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

  • Ekpenyong Nyong Akpanika

    Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

  • Gregory Ajima Onah

    Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

  • Ubong Eyo Ekpenyong

    Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

  • Hilary Idiege Adie

    Department of Public Administration, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

  • Bob B. Etta

    Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

  • Romanus Aboh

    Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Calabar, Cross River, 540281, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6610
Received: 11 May 2024 | Revised: 11 June 2024 | Accepted: 28 June 2024 | Published Online: 20 July 2024

Abstract

This article investigates the ways in which language is employed in the construction of social power in selected institutional discourses. Speech acts theory and Fairclough’s concept of language and power serve as the study’s theoretical anchor. Data were generated through (non)participant observations in a five-year fieldwork to examine the peculiarities in instantiating social power using specific terms in workplace interactions involving participants with unequal power derived from the social roles they perform within the scope of this study. During the period, institutional discourses that demonstrate the enactment of social power in medical, religious, political, legal, academic and security domains in Calabar Metropolis, South-south Nigeria, were closely observed and documented. The linguistic choices show institutional and power differentials in the rehearsal of social power among discourse participants where one wields more than the other(s). Social power, as demonstrated, is dynamic and excised using the domain’s registers and enacted towards the punishment, reward, confinement, reformation, freedom or general wellbeing of the recipient. The study enriches the understanding of how social power holders rely on inferred authority and certification from their professional affiliations and work conventions to construct and maintain social power.

Keywords:

Language use; Social power; Power relations; Social roles; Institutional discourse

References

Abdely, A.A., 2016. Power and solidarity in social interactions: A review of selected studies, Journal of Language and Communication. 3(1), 1–13.

Aboh, R., 2009. Semantic map and ideology in select Nigerian poetic discourse. African Journal of History and Culture. 1(1), 6–15.

Aboh, R., 2013. Lexical and discursive construction of identity in selected 21st century Nigerian novels [Ph.D. thesis]. Oyo: University of Ibadan.

Austin, J.L., 1962. How to do things with words. Clarendon Press: Oxford.

Brauer, M., Bourhis, R.Y., 2006. Social power. European Journal of Social Psychology. 36(4), 601–616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.355

Christensen, J.L., 1980. The minister’s service handbook. Assemblies of God: Aba.

Eden, D., 1990. Pygmalion without interpersonal contrast effects—whole groups gain from raising manager expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology. 75(4), 394–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.4.394

Ellah, S.M., Uwen, G.O., 2020. Explicatural strategies in the language of medical case notes in Nigeria. NDUNODE: Calabar Journal of the Humanities. 17(1), 118–132.

Elechi, M., Jaja, I.R., 2020. Power and authority in Nigerian political system: A philosophical appraisal. Nasara Journal of Philosophy. 156–170.

Fairclough, N., 1992. Discourse and social change. Polity Press: Cambridge.

Fairclough, N., 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman: London.

FGN, 1999. The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended). Federal Government Press: Lagos.

FGN, 2020. Nigeria police act, 2020. Federal Government Press: Lagos.

Fiske, S.T., Berdahl, J., 2007. Social power. In: A. W. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (eds). Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd edn). New York: Guilford. pp. 678–692.

Hung, S., Deng, F., 2017. Language and power. Communication. 2(4), 17–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.436

Kattakayam, J.J., 2006. Power and knowledge: Some reflections on contemporary practices. Sociological Bulletin. 55(3), 449–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920060306

Koslowsky, M., Stashevsky, S., 2005. Organizational values and social power. International Journal of Manpower. 26(1), 23–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720510587253

Krippendorf, K., 1989b. The power of communication and the communication of power: Toward an emancipatory theory of communication. Communication. 12(3), 175–196.

Liddicoat, A.J., Bryant, P., 2000. Language planning and language ecology: A current issue in language planning. Current Issues in Language Planning. 1(3), 303–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14664200008668010

Mensah, E., Oreoluwa, B., Ebong, O., et al., 2023. It’s better to die before dishonour: Linguistic creativity and the negotiation of meaning in the Nigerian Army community of practice. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 5(2), 1610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/FLS.v5i2.1610

Nyamekye, E., Uwen, G.O., 2024. Language, identity, and resistance to English hegemony: unpacking language ideologies in Twitter discourses on Twi usage among the ‘Kumasiano Guys’ in Ghana. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 11(1), 2345465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2345465

Ogundoyin, O.S., 2018. Doctor-patient communicative interaction: The relationship between communication styles and patient satisfaction. International Journal of Integrative Humanism. 1(1), 71–78.

Oishi, E., 2006. Austin’s speech act theory and the speech situation. Esercizi Filosofici, 1(2006), 1-14.

Raven, B.H., 2008. The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 8(1), 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2008.00159.x

Searle, J.R., 1969. Speech acts: An essay on philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Searle, J.R., 1983. Intentionality: An essay on philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Stolte, J.F., Alan, G., Cook, K.S., 2001. Sociological miniaturism: Seeing the big through the small in social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology. 27(1), 387–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.387

James, K.,1976. Holy Bible: King James Version. Moonstar.

Ukonu, M.O., Nwachukwu, C.A., Mgboji, O.A., 2020. Evaluation of Doctor-patient communication outcomes in two public hospitals in Enugu and Ebonyi States, Nigeria. African Population Studies. 34(1), 5115–5131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11564/34-1-1498

Uwen, G.O., Ekpang, J.N., 2022. A socio-onomastic categorisation of Erei personal names. Onoma. 57, 267–284.

Uwen, G.O., Ekpenyong, B.A., 2022. “Esprit de Corps”: Ingroup identity construction and contextual conceptualisations among the (para) military discourse community. Journal of Language, Identity & Education. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2054419

Uwen, G.O., 2023. Every corona is not a virus: A semiotic analysis of Coronavirus mimetic humour. The European Journal of Humour Research. 11(1), 117–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR.2023.11.1.678

Uwen, G.O., 2023. Objection overruled: Language dynamics and power relations in courtroom interactions. Language Matters. 54(2), 21–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2023.2229533

Uwen, G.O., Eyang, A.E., 2023. Officers and men, and fallen heroes: The discursive construction of regimented masculinity in the Nigerian Army. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 5(3), 1761.DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i3.1761

Van Eck, E., 2020. A theology of marriage: A biblical or a cultural construct? HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies. 76(4).

Van der Heide, A., Rufas, A., Supper, A., 2016. Doctoral dissertation defenses: Performing ambiguity between ceremony and assessment. Science as Culture. 25(4), 473–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1183610

Downloads

How to Cite

Ogban Uwen, G., Nyong Akpanika, E., Ajima Onah, G., Eyo Ekpenyong, U., Idiege Adie, H., B. Etta, B., & Aboh, R. (2024). You are Under Arrest: Language Use for Social Power Construction in Institutional Discourse. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6610

Issue

Article Type

Article