Rut Martínez-Borda
Department of Department of Philology, Communications and Documentation, The University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
Laura Méndez
Developmental Psychology and Education, UNED, Madrid, Spaina
Pilar Lacasa
Department of Department of Philology, Communications and Documentation, The University of Alcalá and The International University of La Rioja, La Rioja, Spain
This study aims to analyze human-media interaction, focusing on Twitter users' perceptions and imaginaries of children's use of the Internet and digital devices. The concepts of media panic, mediation, and mediatization are the theoretical keystones supporting the discussion. Exploring users' reactions and representations reveals that mobile communication and social networks are crucial to understanding broader cultural and social transformations. The evolving landscape of the Internet reveals its diverse applications and implications, shaping collective imaginaries and influencing personal and global paradigms. The methodology combines quantitative big data and qualitative analysis, supported by content, thematic, and discourse analysis approaches. The analysis was carried out in several phases: a) big data scraping to contextualize users; b) categorization using the specific software; c) thematic analysis; d) selecting specific examples and providing links to all the posts in the analysis. The results demonstrate different conceptual levels as pathways to approach social media users' perceptions. First, this study shows that social media plays a relevant role in defining the online space for children. It draws attention to the fact that network differences are also related to characteristics that define social actors. Responses included references to the need for regulation, which we associate with media panic, and alternatives to this attitude through references to social change and mediatization. This study also focused on the role played by the media as agents of social change linked to the concept of mediatization; the elements that contextualize these perspectives can be social actors, digital tools, and social media.
[1] Jenkins, H., Shresthova, S., Gamber-Thompson, L., et al., 2016. By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism. NYU Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–352.
[2] Shekhawat, G., Livingstone, S., 2023. AI and Children's Rights: A Guide to the Transnational Guidance. Available from: https://bit.ly/3OhTG64 (cited 11 July 2024).
[3] Housley, W., Edwards, A., Beneito-Montagut, R., et al., 2023. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Society. SAGE Publications Ltd.: London, UK. pp. 1–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529783193
[4] Van Rijmenam, M., 2022. Step into the Metaverse: How the Immersive Internet Will Unlock a Trillion-Dollar Social Economy. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 1–256.
[5] Rohlinger, D.A., Sobieraj, S. (Eds.), 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Digital Media Sociology. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197510636.001.0001
[6] Zarkadakēs, G.R., Tapscott, D., 2020. Cyber Republic: Reinventing Democracy in the Age of Intelligent Machines. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 1–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11853.001.0001
[7] Guarcello, E., 2024. School Children and the Challenge of Managing AI Technologies: Fostering a Critical Relationship Through Aesthetic Experiences. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032694283
[8] Almeida, C., Macedo-Rouet, M., de Carvalho, V.B., et al., 2023. When Does Credibility Matter? The Assessment of Information Sources in Teenagers Navigation Regimes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 55(1), 218–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211064647
[9] Magin, M., Geiß, S., Stark, B., et al., 2022. Common Core in Danger? Personalized Information and the Fragmentation of the Public Agenda. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 27(4), 887–909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211026595
[10] Uricchio, W., 2003. Historicizing Media in Transition. In: Thorburn, D., Jenkins, H., Seawell, B. (Eds.). Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 23–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5930.003.0005
[11] O'Neill, B., Dinh, T., 2018. The Better Internet for Kids Policy Map: Implementing the European Strategy for a Better Internet for Children in European Member States. Available from: https://www.betterinternetforkids.eu/bikmap (cited 11 July 2024).
[12] Peebles, A., Chen, Y.A., 2024. Parental Internet Practices in the Family System: Restrictive Mediation, Problematic Internet Use, and Adolescents' Age-Related Variations in Perceptions of Parent-Child Relationship Quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 41(6), 1347–1369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231221581
[13] Thorburn, D., Jenkins, H., Seawell, B., 2003. Rethinking Media Change: The Aesthetics of Transition. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. pp. 1–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5930.001.0001
[14] Buckingham, D., Jensen, H.S, 2012. Beyond “Media Panics”. Journal of Children and Media. 6(4), 413–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2012.740415
[15] Drotner, K., 2016. Modernity and Media Panics. In: Skovmand, M., Schrøder, K. (Eds.). Media Cultures: Reappraising Transnational Media. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 413–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315511931-4
[16] Walsh, J.P., 2020. Social Media and Moral Panics: Assessing the Effects of Technological Change on Societal Reaction. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 23(6), 840–859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920912257
[17] Couldry, N., Hepp, A., 2017. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–256.
[18] Lundby, K., 2014. Mediatization of Communication. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp.1–738.
[19] Livingstone, S., Lunt, P., 2014. Mediatization: An Emerging Paradigm for Media and Communication Research? In: Lundby, K. (Ed.). Mediatization of Communication. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp. 703–723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215.703
[20] Hargittai, E., 2020. Potential Biases in Big Data: Omitted Voices on Social Media. Social Science Computer Review. 38(1), 10–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318788322
[21] Boegershausen, J., Datta, H., Borah, A., et al., 2022. Fields of Gold: Scraping Web Data for Marketing Insights. Journal of Marketing. 86(5), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221100750
[22] Gee, J.P., 2014. Discourse and the New Literacy Studies. In: Gee, J.P. (ed.). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, 4th ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 371–382.
[23] Jones, R.H., Chik, A., Hafner, C.A. (Eds.)., 2015. Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465
[24] Recuber, T., 2017. Digital Discourse Analysis: Finding Meaning in Small Online Spaces. In: Daniels, J., Gregory, K. (Eds.). Digital Sociology in Everyday Life. Policy Press: Bristol, UK. pp. 963–1270.
[25] Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E., Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), 2015. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK. pp. 1–992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194
[26] van Geenen, D., van Es, K., Gray, J.W., 2024. Pluralising critical technical practice. Convergence. 30(1), 7–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231192105
[27] Dennis, M.A., Kahn, R., 2024. Internet: Computer network. Available from: https://bit.ly/45v1Xuz (cited 11 July 2024).
[28] Consalvo, M., Ess, C. (Eds.), 2010. The Handbook of Internet Studies. Wiley-Blackwell: West Sussex, UK. pp. 1–512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444314861
[29] Dyer, H., Abidin, C., 2022. Understanding Identity and Platform Cultures. In: Housley, W., Edwards, A., Beneito-Montagut, R., et al. (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Digital Society. Sage Publications: London, UK. pp. 1–672.
[30] Mcclain, C., Rainie, L., Bell, P., 2023. Life on Social Media Platforms, in Users' Own Words. Available from: https://pewrsr.ch/4aJonup (cited 11 July 2024).
[31] McDowell, Z.J., Tiidenberg, K., 2023. The (Not So) Secret Governors of the Internet: Morality Policing and Platform Politics. Convergence. 29(6), 1609–1623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231193694
[32] Van Dijck, J., 2021. Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Visualizing Platformization and Its Governance. New Media and Society. 23(9), 2801–2819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820940293
[33] Hunsinger, J., Allen, M.M., Klastrup, L. (Eds.), 2020. Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer: The Netherlands. pp. 1–1066. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1.
[34] Wolf, M.J.P. (Ed.), 2018. The Routledge Companion to Imaginary Worlds. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315637525
[35] Bory, P., 2020. The Internet Myth: From the Internet Imaginary to Network Ideologies. University of Westminster Press: London, UK. pp. 1–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16997/book48
[36] Ling, R., 2023. Nascent, Liminal, and Emerging Technologies. Emerging Media. 1(1), 9–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543231196206
[37] Ling, R., 2012. Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society. MIT Press: London, UK. pp. 1–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8445.001.0001
[38] Neumayer, C., Sicart, M., 2023. Probably Not a Game: Playing with the AI in the Ritual of Taking Pictures on the Mobile Phone. New Media and Society. 25(4), 685–701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231158654
[39] Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Stoilova, M., 2023. The Outcomes of Gaining Digital Skills for Young People's Lives and Wellbeing: A Systematic Evidence Review. New Media and Society. 25(5), 1176–1202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211043189
[40] Livingstone, S., Ólafsson, K., Pothong, K., 2023. Digital Play on Children's Terms: A Child Rights Approach to Designing Digital Experiences. New Media and Society. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231196579
[41] Priya, N., Maheswari, P.U., 2024. Influence of different parental mediation strategies on adolescents' hedonistic smartphone use: Parent–adolescent reports. Mobile Media & Communication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579241260649
[42] Burgess, J., Marwick, A., Poell, T., 2018. The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 1–662.
[43] Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A.S., Rubio, A.B., 2023. Defining Affordances in Social Media Research: A Literature Review. New Media and Society. 25(11), 3165–3188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187
[44] Gibson, J.J., 1979/1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, pp. 1–222.
[45] Bucher, T., Helmond, A., 2018. The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In: Burgess, J., Marwick, A., Poell, T. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Media. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 234–245.
[46] Goode, E., Ben-Yehuda, N., 2009. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK. pp. 1–320.
[47] Cohen, S., 2011. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers, 3rd ed. Routledge: Milton Park, UK. pp. 1–282.
[48] McRobbie, A., Thornton, S.L., 1995. Rethinking 'Moral Panic' for Multi-Mediated Social Worlds. The British Journal of Sociology. 46(4), 559–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591571.
[49] Falkof, N., 2018. On Moral Panic: Some Directions for Further Development. Critical Sociology. 46(2), 225–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518803698
[50] Cree, V., Clapton, G., Smith, M., 2015. Revisiting Moral Panics. Policy Press: Bristol, UK.
[51] Hunt, A., 1997. ‘Moral Panic' and Moral Language in the Media. The British Journal of Sociology. 48(4), 629–648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/591600
[52] Nicholas, S., O'Malley, T., 2013. Moral Panics, Social Fears, and the Media: Historical Perspectives. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–318.
[53] Vasterman, P. (Ed.), 2018. From Media Hype to Twitter Storm: News Explosions and Their Impact on Issues, Crises and Public Opinion. Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 1–402. Available from: https://bit.ly/48TxE2l (cited 24 July 2024).
[54] Drotner, K., 1999. Dangerous Media? Panic Discourses and Dilemmas of Modernity. Paedagogica Historica. 35(3), 593–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0030923990350303
[55] Springhall, J., 1998. Youth, Popular Culture and Moral Panics: Penny Gaffs to Gangsta-rap, 1830–1996. St. Martin's Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–218.
[56] Sternheimer, K., 2015. Pop Culture Panics: How Moral Crusaders Construct Meanings of Deviance and Delinquency. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–164.
[57] De Keere, K., Thunnissen, E., Kuipers, G., 2020. Defusing Moral Panic: Legitimizing Binge-Watching as Manageable, High-Quality, Middle-Class Hedonism. Media, Culture and Society. 43(4), 629–647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720972315
[58] Drotner, K., 2000. Difference and Diversity: Trends in Young Danes' Media Uses. Media, Culture and Society. 22(2), 149–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016344300022002002
[59] Drotner, K., Schroder, K.C. (Eds.), 2010. Digital Content Creation. Perceptions, Practices, Perspectives. Peter Lang: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–323.
[60] Jenkins, H., 2018. Fandom, Negotiation, and Participatory Culture. In: Booth, P. (Ed.), A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, Kindle Edition. (p. iv). Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 13–26.
[61] Jenkins, H., Billard, T.J., Close, S., et al., 2018. Participatory Politics. In: Navas, E., Gallagher, O., Burrough, X., (Eds.). Keywords in Remix Studies. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 230–244. DOI: https://doi.org/40027705169
[62] Peters-Lazaro, G., Shresthova, S., Jenkins, H., 2020. Popular Culture and the Civic Imagination: Case Studies of Creative Social Change. New York University Press: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–400.
[63] Agha, A., 2011. Meet Mediatization. Language and Communication. 31(3), 163–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.03.006
[64] Hjarvard, S., 2014. Mediatization and Cultural and Social Change: An Institutional Perspective. In: Lundby, K. (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp. 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215
[65] Hjarvard, S.H., 2014. Mediatization: Conceptualizing Cultural and Social Change. MATRIZes. 8(1), 21–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v8i1p21-44
[66] Couldry, N., Hepp, A., 2013. Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory. 23(3), 191–202. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019
[67] Couldry, N., 2012. Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Polity: Malden, MA, USA. pp. 1–311.
[68] Livingstone, S., 2009. On the Mediation of Everything: Ica Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication. 59(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x
[69] Silverstone, R., 2002. Complicity and Collision in the Mediation of Everyday Life. New Literary History. 33(4), 745–764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2002.0045
[70] Silverstone, R., 2005. Media and Communication. In: Calhoun, C., Rojek, C., Turner, B. (Eds.), The International Handbook of Sociology. Sage: London, UK. pp. 188–208.
[71] Green, L. (Ed.), 2021. The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–630.
[72] Couldry, N., 2014. Mediatization and the Future of Field Theory. In: Lundby, K. (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp. 227–245.
[73] Barry, W.I.A., Abdellatif, M.A.M., Moayad, H.G., 2024. Mediatization and Patterns of Social Interaction on Social Media. Global Media and Communication. 20(2), 237–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665221135094
[74] Couldry, N., 2020. Media, Why It Matters. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 1–140.
[75] Kopecka-Piech, K., Bolin, G.R., 2023. Contemporary Challenges in Mediatisation Research. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–214.
[76] Deacon, D., Stanyer, J., 2015. ‘Mediatization and' or ‘Mediatization of'? A Response to Hepp et al. Media, Culture and Society. 37(4), 655–657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715580761
[77] Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., Lundby, K., 2015. Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay Between Media, Culture and Society. Media, Culture and Society. 37(2), 314–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443715573835
[78] Lunt, P., Livingstone, S., 2016. Is ‘Mediatization' the New Paradigm for Our Field? A Commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014, 2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture and Society. 38(3), 462–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716631288
[79] Livingstone, S., 2019. Audiences in an Age of Datafication: Critical Questions for Media Research. Television and New Media. 20(2), 170–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418811118
[80] Bengtsson, S., Fast, K., Jansson, A., et al., 2021. Media and Basic Desires: An Approach to Measuring the Mediatization of Daily Human Life. Communications. 46(2), 275–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0122
[81] Åkerblad, L., Seppänen-Järvelä, R., Haapakoski, K., 2021. Integrative Strategies in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 15(2), 152–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820957125
[82] Creamer, E.G., 2018. An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA. pp. 1–268.
[83] Martínez-Borda, R., de-la-Fuente, J., Lacasa, P., 2021. Digital Storytelling in Times of Pandemic: TV Series, Social Media and Internet Conversations. Frontiers in Psychology. 12, 677713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677713
[84] Yang, Y., Zhang, K., Kannan, P.K., 2021. Identifying Market Structure: A Deep Network Representation Learning of Social Engagement. Journal of Marketing. 86(4), 37–56, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429211033585
[85] Saldaña, J., 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 4th ed. Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA. pp. 1–440.
[86] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2021. Can I Use TA? Should I Use TA? Should I Not Use TA? Comparing Reflexive Thematic Analysis and Other Pattern-Based Qualitative Analytic Approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 21(1), 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
[87] Schellewald, A., 2022. Theorizing “Stories About Algorithms” as a Mechanism in the Formation and Maintenance of Algorithmic Imaginaries. Social Media + Society. 8(1), 20563051221077024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077025
[88] Livingstone, S., Third, A., 2017. Children and Young People's Rights in the Digital Age: An Emerging Agenda. New Media and Society. 19(5), 657–670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686318
[89] Panda, M., Abraham, A., Hassanien, A.E., 2018. Big Data Analytics. A Social Network Approach. Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Rato, FL, USA. pp. 1–322.
[90] Auxier, B., Anderson, M., 2021. Social Media Use in 2021. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://pewrsr.ch/3easaFn (cited 11 July 2024).
[91] Auxier, B., Anderson, M., Perrin, A., et al., 2020. Parenting Children in the Age of Screens. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://pewrsr.ch/3e2EUxO (cited 11 July 2024).
[92] Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Staksrud, E., 2015. Developing a Framework for Researching Children's Online Risks and Opportunities in Europe. EU Kids Online. Available online: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64470/ (cited 24 July 2024).
[93] Lacasa, P., 2020. Adolescent Fans. Practices, Discourses, and Communities. Peter Lang: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–256. DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3726/b14291
[94] Paoletti, J., Bisbey, T.M., Zajac, S., et al., 2021. Looking to the Middle of the Qualitative-Quantitative Spectrum for Integrated Mixed Methods. Small Group Research. Small Group Research. 52(6), 641–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496421992433
[95] Armborst, A., 2017. Thematic Proximity in Content Analysis. SAGE Open. 7(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017707797
[96] Boellstorff, T., 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA. pp. 1–264.
[97] Bogdan, R., Biklen, S.K., 2007. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, 5th ed. Pearson A and B: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 1–328.
[98] Flick, U. (Ed.), 2018. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. Available online: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/RMIT/detail.action?docID=5202389 (cited 24 July 2024).
[99] Hier, S.P., 2019. Moral Panic and the New Neoliberal Compromise. Current Sociology. 67(6), 879–897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119829511
[100] Goantă, C., Ranchordás, S., 2020. The Regulation of Social Media Influencers. Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK. pp. 1–352.
[101] Martínez-Borda, R., Lacasa, P., Castillo, H.d., 2020. Big and small data: Watching and discussing television series on streaming. Cuadernos.Info Comunicación y medios en Iberoamérica. 49, 331–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.49.27297
Copyright © 2024 Rut Martínez-Borda, Laura Méndez, Pilar Lacasa
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
