Bridging the Gaps: How Intersubjectivity Shapes Historical and Scientific Cognition of Chinese Linguistics

Authors

  • Dongxing Yu

    School of Education, Sanda University, Shanghai 201209, China

  • Xue-Ning Tang

    University of Amsterdam, 1012 XL Amsterdam, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6747
Received: 12 June 2024 | Revised: 9 July 2024 | Accepted: 4 September 2024 | Published Online: 15 November 2024

Abstract

This paper explores the pivotal role of intersubjectivity in shaping the historical and scientific cognition of Chinese linguistics. It examines how shared understanding and mutual comprehension, facilitated through social interactions and communication, have influenced both traditional scholarship and modern approaches to studying the Chinese language. The paper traces the intersubjective foundations laid by pioneering scholars like Fang Yi-zhi, the integration of Western linguistic theories in the 19th and 20th centuries, and the interdisciplinary connections with fields like genetics and cognitive science in recent decades. It also discusses how contemporary advancements in computational linguistics and AI have fostered intersubjective dialogues and collective meaning-making. The synthesis of insights across disciplines highlights the collaborative nature of linguistic research and the importance of conceptualizing language as a dynamic, interactive process. Ultimately, the paper demonstrates how intersubjectivity has enabled the continuous evolution of Chinese linguistic scholarship by integrating historical context with modern scientific methodologies.

Keywords:

Intersubjectivity; Chinese Linguistics; Interdisciplinary Approaches

References

[1] Yu, D., 2023. 语言的交互主观性研究:以汉语, 英语为例 [Intersubjectivity research in languages: Chinese and English as examples]. 上海辞书出版社 [Shanghai Dictionary Publishing House]: Shanghai, China. pp. 2−20.

[2] Linell, P., 2014. Interactivities, Intersubjectivities and Language: On Dialogism and Phenomenology. Language and Dialogue. 4, 165−193.

[3] Etelämäki, M., 2016. Introduction: Discourse, Grammar and Intersubjectivity. Nordic Journal of Linguistics. 39, 101−112.

[4] Lu, L.W., Su, L., 2009. Speech in Interaction: Mandarin Particle Le as a Marker of Intersubjectivity. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht. 14, 155−168.

[5] Tantucci, V., Wang, A., 2020. From Co-Actions to Intersubjectivity Throughout Chinese ontogeny: A Usage-Based Analysis of Knowledge Ascription and Expected Agreement. Journal of Pragmatics. 167, 98−115.

[6] Fedorenko, E., Piantadosi, S.T., Gibson, E.A.F., 2024. Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought. Nature. 630, 575–586.

Downloads

How to Cite

Dongxing Yu, & Xue-Ning Tang. (2024). Bridging the Gaps: How Intersubjectivity Shapes Historical and Scientific Cognition of Chinese Linguistics. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6747