Klara Abisheva
Department of Social, Humanitarian Sciences and Linguistic Disciplines, “Turan-Astana” University, Y. Dukenuly Str., 29, Astana 010013, Republic of Kazakhstan
Marzhan Akosheva
Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Kenzhegali Sagadiev University of International Business, Abai Ave, 8a, Almaty 050051, Republic of Kazakhstan
Nurzhan Kulumzhanov
Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Zhenis Ave, 62, Astana 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
Batzhamal Abilova
Pedagogical Institute, Astana International University, Kabanbay Batyr Ave, 8, Astana 010000, Republic of Kazakhstan
Bulat Ayapbergenov
Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, S.Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Faculty of Humanities, Zhenis Ave, 62, Astana 010011, Republic of Kazakhstan
Almas Nurmanov
International Relations, “Turan-Astana” University, Y. Dukenuly Str. 29, Astana 010013, Republic of Kazakhstan
The article is devoted to the study of the cognitive nature of ethical knowledge, its essence and substantive contours. There is no classification of ethical knowledge in science, so the formats of its representation and its types have not been determined. The aim of the article is to identify the cognitive foundations of morality, its rational or sensual nature; to determine the ethical knowledge based on its characteristics and classification according to types of representation in knowledge formats. To prove the representability of ethical knowledge a conceptual analysis of the concept “responsibility” is carried out; a value-labeled algorithm of a person’s moral behavior is presented in the ethical script. A cognitive ethical scenario of the category “compassion” is considered; an evaluative categorization of the concept’s “pity” and “ruthlessness” are given; a frame model of the concept “virtue” and the representability of ethical knowledge in knowledge formats (concept, scenario, evaluative categorization, frame, cognition) are constructed.
The study also identifies features of ethical knowledge with their definitions, their classification that is carried out based on the criteria of what it is, and what it should be. The authors recognize the cognitive nature of ethical knowledge and consider it can be an information product of cognitive activity, that is tested for truth, expressed as new knowledge, while which person is evaluating behavior, represented in knowledge formats. In the article scientists’ points of view according to which ethical knowledge relates to the theoretical level of knowledge, metaethics or to the practical level of knowledge, practical ethics or philosophy are analyzed. The authors adhere to the statement that ethical knowledge has a dual nature (practical knowledge that regulates human behavior, theoretical knowledge, norms, principles, ethical knowledge). In the course of the research, the following scientific results were obtained: the cognitive essence of ethical knowledge was revealed confirmed by the features of its cognition (informativeness, truth, verifiability, knowability, representability). The authors’ positions which recognize the cognitive nature of ethical knowledge of cognitivists are reflected. The features of ethical knowledge with their definitions are identified; the classification of ethical knowledge is carried out based on the criteria of what it is and what it should be. The level of scientificity and practicality of ethical knowledge is determined. The conclusion is made about the existence of scientific (metaethics) and practical ethics; the cognitive measurability and representability of knowledge through knowledge formats has been proven. Conclusion about that the ethical knowledge has a cognitive status is drawn. The knowledge obtained as a result of cognitive-linguistic activity, provides new information about kinds of behaviour, ways of regulating value relations between people, knowledge about moral values, categories, norms verbalized with the help of language units.
[1] Khakimyanov, A.M., 2010. The role and place of ethical knowledge in the modern spiritual situation. Bulletin of Bashkir University. 15(3), 797–780. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rol-i-mesto-eticheskogo-znaniya-v-sovremennoy-duhovnoy-situatsii
[2] Mantatova, L.V., 2003. The spiritual imperative of sustainable development. Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 7, Philosophy. 2, 87–95. ISSN 0201–7385.
[3] Maksimov, L.V., 2009. Cognitivism and non-cognitivism. Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. Moscow: "Canon+" ROOI "Rehabilitation". 1248p. ISBN 978-5-88373-089-3.
[4] Maksimov, L.V., 2018. On methodological dilemmas of theoretical ethics. Philosophical Thought. 10, 31–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8728.2019.10.31666
[5] Lamberov, L.D., 2013. Noncognitivism in ethics and deflationism: the problem of general methodological foundations. Scientific Bulletin of the Omsk Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 3(50), 34–38. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nonkognitivizm-v-etike-i-deflyatsionizm-problema-obschih-metodologicheskih-osnovaniy
[6] Iyer, A.J., 2010. Language, truth and logic. Moscow: "Canon+" ROOI "Rehabilitation». ISBN 978-5-88373-180-7.
[7] Hare, R., 1993. Objective Prescriptions. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 35, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100006214
[8] Audi, R., 2008. Rational disagreement as a challenge to practical ethics and moral theory: an essay in moral epistemology. In: Quentin Smith (Ed.). Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 225–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264933.003.0010
[9] Mikirtumov, I.B., Frolov, K.G., 2022. Noncognitivism and moral statements. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science. (70), 189–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863Х/70/17
[10] Pozdnyakova, E.M., Sablina, G.F., 2008. The category of knowledge in modern linguistics. Cognitive language Studies. 3, 55–60. ISSN 2071–9639.
[11] Kornblith, H., 2008. The Metaphysical Status of Knowledge. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift. 43(1), 77–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2901-2008-01-07
[12] Maksimov, L.V., 2008. Cognitive status of ethics. Ethical Thought. (8), 3–20. Available from: https://iphras.ru/uplfile/root/biblio/em/em8/1.pdf
[13] Temirgazina, Z., Nikolaenko, S., Akosheva, M., et al., 2020. Naive anatomy in the Kazakh language world picture in comparison with English and Russian. XLinguae. 13(2), 3–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2020.13.02.01
[14] Abdigalieva, G.K., 2005. The problem of values in the history of philosophy. Kazakh University: Almaty. 232p. ISBN 9965-12-866-9.
[15] Boldyrev, N.N., 2009. Conceptual basis of language. Cognitive studies of language. Vol. IV. Conceptualization of the world in language: a collective monograph. M.; Tambov: Institute of Linguistics RAS; Publishing house of TSU hamed after. G.R. Derzhavin. pp. 25–77. ISBN 978-5-89016-411-7.
[16] Lukin, O.V., 2015. New directions of modern linguistics (second half of the 20th century – 21st century). RIO YSPU: Yaroslavl. 80p. ISBN 978–5–00089–095–0.
[17] Concise Dictionary of Cognitive Terms, 1996. Under general ed. E. S. Kubryakova. M.: MSU. 245p. ISBN 5-89042-018-1.
[18] Аkosheva, М., Rakhimzhanov, К., Temirgazina, Z., 2022. Who do we compare ugly
[19] people with? Standards of ugliness in the Russian language. Slavia Centralis. 15(1), 138–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/scn.15.1.138–154.2022
[20] Leontyev, D.A., 1997. Essay on personality psychology. Sence: Moscow. 43p. ISBN 5-85494-012-4.
[21] Horkhmeier, M., Adomo, I., 2016. The cultural industry: enlightenment as a way to deseive the masses. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press. 112p. ISBN: 978-5-91103-276-0.
[22] Bauman, Z., 2000. Ethics of individuals. Canadian Journal of Sociology. 25(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341912
[23] Jonas, G., 2004. The principle of responsibility. Experience of ethics for technological civilization. Iris-Press: Moscow. 480p. ISBN: 5-8112-0625-9.
[24] Fromm, E., 2006. Escape from freedom. A man for himself. M.: AST. 571p. ISBN 5-17-022341-2.
[25] Maslow, A., 2019. New frontiers of human nature. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction, Sence. 496p. ISBN 978-5-91671-116-5. Available from: https://www.iprbookshop.ru/82752.html
[26] Ovchinnikova, E.A., Sergeev, A.S., 2011. Ethical problems of the information space. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University International relations. (2), 38–43. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/eticheskie-problemy-informatsionnogo-prostranstva
[27] Murdoch, I., 1976. Bruno's Dream. Penguin Books. 320p.
[28] Romanova, T.V., 2006. The category of modality in the light of cognitive linguistics. Questions of cognitive linguistics. (1), 29–35. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kategoriya-modalnosti-v-svete-kognitivnoy-lingvistiki
[29] Wolf, E.M., 2003. Subjective modality and semantics of proposition. Logical analysis of language. Favorites. M.: Indrik. 696p. ISBN: 5-85759-232-1.
[30] Boldyrev, N.N., 2006. Language categories as a format of knowledge. Issues in Cognitive Linguistics. (2), 5–22. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yazykovye-kategorii-kak-format-znaniya
[31] Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C.F., et al.,1986. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(5), 1032–1043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032
[32] Shukshin, V., 2011. I want to live EKSMO Publishing House. pp. 1–22. ISBN: 978-5-699-52036-7.
[33] Boldyrev, N.N., 2012. Categorical system of language. Cognitive studies of language. Vol. X. Categorization of the world in language: collective monograph. M.; Tambov: Institute of Linguistics RAS: Publishing house of TSU named after G.R. Derzhavin. pp. 17–120. ISBN 978-5-89016-803-0.
Copyright © 2024 Klara Abisheva, Marzhan Akosheva, Nurzhan Kulumzhanov, Batzhamal Abilova , Bulat Ayapbergenov , Almas Nurmanov
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
