Orthographic Challenges Encountered by Fourth-Grade English Language Learners in a Rural-Based South African Primary School

Authors

  • Innocent Zitha

    Department of Science Foundation, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, Limpopo 0152, South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.6972
Received: 31 July 2024 | Revised: 19 August 2024 | Accepted: 20 August 2024 | Published Online: 27 November 2024

Abstract

The significant role of orthographic competence in the mastery of essay writing and reading ability by fourth-grade learners has been overlooked by teachers in the context of English being taught as an additional language. This research focused on assessing the orthographic competence of Grade 4 learners and exploring potential solutions. Using a qualitative approach, 16 Grade 4 learners and three educators were purposefully selected as participants. The study revealed that most Grade 4 learners struggle with orthographic challenges in their written essays, with mistakes falling into five categories: capitalization, substitution, word spacing, addition, and omission. Educators cited the lack of access to a library and inadequate emphasis on phonemes and graphemes in the English language as contributing factors. Additionally, the dominant use of the educators' native language during English lessons and the absence of spelling bee competitions were identified as barriers to orthographic proficiency. It was concluded that learners struggle to correct these mistakes on their own. The implication of this study is that it underscores the practical importance of orthographic competence in essay writing. The study's recommendations, which include implementing frequent dictation activities and emphasizing rules on capitalization, compound words, letters, and syllables, provide practical solutions for addressing orthographic challenges in English education.

Keywords:

Capitalization; English as a Second Language; Error; Homophone; Omission; Spelling Mistake; Substitution; Word Division

References

[1] Kim, Y.S., Apel, K., Al Otaiba, S., 2013. The Relation of Linguistic Awareness and Vocabulary to Word Reading and Spelling for First Grade Students Participating in Response to Intervention. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 44, 337–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2013/12-0013)

[2] Tong, X., McBride, C., 2017. Toward a Graded Psycholexical Space Mapping Model: Sublexical and Lexical Representations in Chinese Character Reading Development. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 51(5), 482–489.

[3] Ehri, L.C., 2014. Orthographic Mapping in the Acquisition of Sight Word Reading, Spelling Memory, and Vocabulary Learning. Scientific Studies of Reading. 18, 5–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356

[4] Loveall, S.J., Channell, M.M., Phillips, B.A., et al., 2013. Phonological Recoding, Rapid Automatized Naming, and Orthographic Knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 116, 738–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.05.009

[5] Treiman, R., 2017. Learning to Spell: Phonology and Beyond. Cognitive Neuropsychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1337630

[6] Pasquarella, A., Deacon, H., Chen, B.X., et al., 2014. Acquiring Orthographic Processing Through Word Reading: Evidence from Children Learning to Read French and English. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 61, 240–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.932579

[7] Al-zuoud, K.M., Kabilan, M.K., 2013. Investigating Jordanian EFL Students' Spelling Errors at Tertiary Level. International Journal of Linguistics. 5(3), 164–176.

[8] Cook, D.A., Sorensen, K.J., Wilkinson, J.M., et al., 2013. Barriers and decisions when answering clinical questions at the point of care: a grounded theory study. JAMA internal medicine. 173(21), 1962–1969.

[9] Alhaisoni, E., Al-Zuoud, K.M., Gaudel, D.R., 2015. Analysis of Spelling Errors of Beginner Learners of English in the English Foreign Language Context in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching. 8(3), 185–192.

[10] Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., 2014. Deficits in Orthographic Knowledge in Children Poor at Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) Tasks? Scientific Studies of Reading. 18, 192–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.862249

[11] Chomsky, N. 1959. Three models for the description of language. IRE Transactions on Information Theory. 2(3), 113–124.

[12] Masterson, J.J., Apel, K., 2010. The Spelling Sensitivity Score: Noting Developmental Changes in Spelling Knowledge. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 36, 35–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508410380039

[13] Zitha, I., Lambani, M.N., 2024. Register competence in academic writing of student teachers specialising in English didactics at the University of Venda. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2024.2311887

[14] Fender, M., 2008. Spelling Knowledge and Reading Development: Insights from Arab ESL Learners. Reading in a Foreign Language. 20(1), 19–42.

[15] Khosa, M.S., Zitha, I., 2024. Code-switching as a tactical approach to enhance learner engagement with intricate concepts in oral English presentations. International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science. 13(6).

Downloads

How to Cite

Innocent Zitha. (2024). Orthographic Challenges Encountered by Fourth-Grade English Language Learners in a Rural-Based South African Primary School. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.6972

Issue

Article Type

Article