Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactive M-Learning in Fostering EFL Vocabulary for Enhanced Speaking Proficiency

Authors

  • Raja Muhammad Ishtiaq Khan

    Department of English Language, College of Education, Majmaah University, AlMajmaah, Saudi Arabia

  • Majed Abdullah Alharbi

    Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

  • Noor Raha Mohd Radzuan

    Centre for Modern Languages, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.7068
Received: 12 August 2024 | Revised: 2 September 2024 | Accepted: 12 October 2024 | Published Online: 14 November 2024

Abstract

This study aims to assess the impact of interactive vocabulary learning via WhatsApp on the speaking proficiency of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners in Saudi Arabia. Drawing on Krashen’s input Hypothesis and Cognitive Theories of Multimedia Learning, the research employs a quantitative approach involving sixty EFL learners from an English language foundation program. Two pre-formed elementary-level groups were randomly assigned as control and experimental groups. The findings indicate that the intervention group showed significant improvements in both vocabulary and speaking tests. To maximize WhatsApp’s effectiveness, it is recommended that content be dynamically designed to accommodate diverse learners, include both genders in future studies, and incorporate video clips and additional images to enhance vocabulary learning and speaking proficiency, with careful planning of vocabulary activities being crucial.

Keywords:

MALL; Speaking; Vocabulary; WhatsApp

References

[1] Krashen, S.D., 1989. We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal. 73(4), 440–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x

[2] Khan, R.M.I., Radzuan, N.R.M., Shahbaz, M., et al., 2018. The role of vocabulary knowledge in speaking development of Saudi EFL learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 9(1), 406–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.28

[3] Schmitt, N., 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning. 64(4), 913–951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077

[4] Cremades, R., Onieva-López, J.L., Maqueda-Cuenca, E., et al., 2021. The influence of mobile instant messaging in language education: perceptions of current and future teachers. Interactive Learning Environments. 29(5), 733–742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612451

[5] Yang, S., Wang, R., Mei, B., 2022. Understanding Chinese secondary school students’ perceptions of mobile-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments. 32(6), 2424–2437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2147957

[6] Dai, K., Wang, Y., 2024. Enjoyable, anxious, or bored? Investigating Chinese EFL learners’ classroom emotions and their engagement in technology-based EMI classrooms. System. 123, 103339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103339

[7] Wang, X., Reynolds, B.L., 2024. Beyond the Books: Exploring Factors Shaping Chinese English Learners’ Engagement with Large Language Models for Vocabulary Learning. Education Sciences. 14(5), 496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050496

[8] Kukulska-Hulme, A., 2021. Reflections on research questions in mobile assisted language learning. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning. 1(1), 28–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2021-2002

[9] Roberts, J., Yaya, L., Manolis, C., 2014. The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 3(4), 254–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/jba.3.2014.015

[10] Vaiopoulou, J., Papadakis, S., Sifaki, E., et al., 2021. Parents’ perceptions of educational apps use for kindergarten children: Development and validation of a new instrument (PEAU-p) and exploration of parents’ profiles. Behavioral Sciences. 11(6), 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11060082

[11] Stockwell, G., 2007. Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 20(4), 365–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220701745817

[12] Fithriani, R., Dewi, U., Daulay, S.H., et al., 2019. Using Facebook in EFL writing class: Its effectiveness from students’ perspective. KnE Social Sciences. 3(19), 634–645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i19.4892

[13] Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D.R., et al., 2019. Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL. 31(3), 293–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344019000065

[14] Wahyuni, S., Febianti, K., 2019. The use of WhatsApp group discussion to improve students’ writing achievement. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal. 1(1), 45–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/ideal.v1i1.7601

[15] Papadakis, S., Alexandraki, F., Zaranis, N., 2021. Mobile device use among preschool-aged children in Greece. Education and Information Technologies. 27, 2717–2750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10718-6

[16] Alfawareh, H.M., Jusoh, S., 2014. Smartphones usage among university students: Najran University case. International Journal of Academic Research. 6(2), 321–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2014/6-2/b.48

[17] Ashiyan, Z., Salehi, H., 2016. Impact of WhatsApp on learning and retention of collocation knowledge among Iranian EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 7(5), 112–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.112

[18] Andújar-Vaca, A., Cruz-Martínez, M.-S., 2017. Mobile instant messaging: WhatsApp and its potential to develop oral skills. Communicate. 25(50), 43–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/c50-2017-04

[19] Wang, Y.L., Xue, L.N., 2024. Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement: An intervention study. Computers in Human Behavior. 159, 108353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108353

[20] Wang, X., Wang, S., 2024. Exploring Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with large language models: A self-determination theory perspective. Learning and Motivation. 87, 102014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102014

[21] Habbash, M., 2015. Learning English vocabulary using mobile phones: Saudi Arabian EFL teachers in focus. European Scientific Journal. 11(35), 448–457. Available from: https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/6808

[22] Hazaea, A.N., Alzubi, A.A., 2016. The effectiveness of using mobile on EFLlearners' reading practices in Najran university. English Language Teaching. 9(5), 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p8

[23] Taj, I.H., Sulan, N.B., Sipra, M.A., et al., 2016. Impact of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) on EFL: A Meta-Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 7(2), 76–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.2p.76

[24] Hamad, M.M., 2017. Using WhatsApp to Enhance Students’ Learning of English Language “Experience to Share”. Higher Education Studies. 7(4), 74–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n4p74

[25] Alqasham, F.H., 2018. Exploring Saudi EFL learners’ agency towards the use of WhatsApp for English learning at Qassim University. International Journal of Linguistics. 10(6), 10–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v10i6.13857

[26] Bensalem, E., 2018. The Impact of WhatsApp on EFL students' Vocabulary Learning. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 9(1), 23–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.2

[27] Gürkan, S., 2018. The effects of a mobile assisted vocabulary learning application on vocabulary learning. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 9(3), 288–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.407512

[28] Al-Ahdal, M.H., Ahmed, A., 2019. MALL in collaborative learning as a vocabulary-enhancing tool for EFL learners: A study across two universities in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching. 12(5), 42–54.

[29] Fattah, S.F.E.S.A., 2015. The Effectiveness of Using WhatsApp Messenger as One of Mobile Learning Techniques to Develop Students' Writing Skills. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(32), 115–127. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083503.pdf

[30] Mustafa, E.N.E., 2018. The impact of YouTube, Skype and WhatsApp in improving EFL learners’ speaking skill. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches. 5(5), 18-31. DOI: https://www.ijcar.net/assets/pdf/Vol5-No5-May2018/02.pdf

[31] Khan, R.M.I., 2022. The use of flashcards in teaching EFL vocabulary in online learning. Register Journal. 15(1), 109–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v15i1.109-125

[32] Keezhatta, M.S., Omar, A., 2019. Enhancing Reading Skills for Saudi Secondary School Students through Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL): An Experimental Study. International Journal of English Linguistics. 9(1), 437–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n1p437

[33] Morris, N.O., 2011. Using technology in the EFL classroom in Saudi Arabia [Master’s thesis]. Brattleboro, Vermont, USA: SIT Graduate Institute. pp. 110–122.

[34] Diaz-vera, J.E., 2012. Left to my own devices: Learner autonomy and mobile-assisted language learning (Vol. 6). Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands. pp. 28–39.

[35] Morsidi, S., Samah, N.A., Rahman, K.A.A., et al., 2021. WhatsApp and Its Potential to Develop Communication Skills among University Students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 15(23). 57–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i23.27243

[36] Ahmed, A.A.A., Hassan, I., Pallathadka, H., et al., 2022. MALL and EFL learners’ speaking: Impacts of Duolingo and WhatsApp applications on speaking accuracy and fluency. Education Research International. 2022(1), 6716474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6716474

[37] Jafre, N.A.B.M., Osman, N.B., Hussain, N.A.B., 2018. Students’ perception on the use of WhatsApp application to enhance communicative skills. International Journal of Education, Islamic Studies and Social Sciences Research. 3(1), 1–13.

[38] Koizumi, R., In'nami, Y., 2013. Vocabulary knowledge and speaking proficiency among second language learners from novice to intermediate levels. Journal of Language Teaching & Research. 4(5), 900–913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.900-913

[39] Koizumi, R., 2005. Relationships between productive vocabulary knowledge and speaking performance of Japanese learners of English at the novice level [Ph.D. Thesis]. Ibaraki, Japan: University of Tsukuba. pp. 88–100.

[40] Hilton, H., 2008. The link between vocabulary knowledge and spoken L2 fluency. Language Learning Journal. 36(2), 153–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389983

[41] Milton, J., Wade, J., Hopkins, N., 2010. Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In: Chacón-Beltrán, C.A.-C.R., Torreblanca-López, M.D.M., (eds.) Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp. 83–98.

[42] Li, H., Lorenzo-Dus, N., 2014. Investigating how vocabulary is assessed in a narrative task through raters' verbal protocols. System. 46, 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.06.006

[43] Lateh, N.H.M., Shamsudin, S., Singh, M.K.S., 2015. Relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and speaking performance. Advanced Science Letters. 21(7), 2466–2469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6312

[44] Uchihara, T., Saito, K., 2016. Exploring the relationship between productive vocabulary knowledge and second language oral ability. The Language Learning Journal. 42(2), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1191527

[45] Disalva, X., Mary, E.S.E., 2020. Enhancing vocabulary of the hotel management students to develop the speaking skill through mobile application. Mukt Shabd Journal. 9(5), 5518–5527. Available from: https://shorturl.at/WZt4T

[46] Cantrell, M.A., 2011. Demystifying the research process: Understanding a descriptive comparative research design. Pediatric Nursing. 37(4), 188–199.

[47] Ingham-Broomfield, R., 2014. A nurses' guide to quantitative research. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 32(2), 32–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37464/2015.322.1573

[48] Bastos, J.L., Duquia, R.P., González-Chica, D.A., et al., 2014. Field work I: selecting the instrument for data collection. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia. 89(6), 918–923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143884

[49] Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Irvine, C.K.S., et al., 2018. Introduction to Research in Education. Cengage Learning: USA. pp. 22–40.

[50] Hyman, L., Lamb, J., Bulmer, M., 2006. The use of pre-existing survey questions: Implications for data quality. Proceedings of the European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics; Cardiff, Wales; 24–26 April 2006.

[51] Sarmah, H., Hazarika, B.B., 2012. Determination of Reliability and Validity measures of a questionnaire. Indian Journal of Education and Information Management. 5(11), 508–517.

[52] Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H.H., 2011. How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA. pp. 54–65.

[53] Brown, R.D., Hauenstein, N.M., 2005. Interrater agreement reconsidered: An alternative to the rwg indices. Organizational Research Methods. 8(2), 165–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105275376

[54] Ranganathan, P., Pramesh, C., Aggarwal, R., 2017. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 8(4), 187–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_123_17

[55] Moen, E.P., 2016. Objective Statistics For The Measurement Of Agreement [Ph.D. Thesis]. Michigan, USA: Wayne State University. pp. 80–94.

[56] Polio, C., Friedman, D.A., 2016. Understanding, Evaluating, and Conducting Second Language Writing Research. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 33–49.

[57] Creswell, J.W., 2009. Research design: Qualitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications: California, USA. pp. 120–132.

[58] Freidlin, B., Miao, W., Gastwirth, J.L., 2003. On the use of the Shapiro‐Wilk test in two‐stage adaptive inference for paired data from moderate to very heavy tailed distributions. Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences. 45(7), 887–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200390056

[59] Krashen, S., 1994. The input hypothesis and its rivals Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Academic Press: London, UK. pp. 45–77.

[60] Bakori, H., 2013. Input enhancement and task-based language learning and teaching. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 3(3), 391–401.

[61] Ahmad, K.S., Sudweeks, F., Armarego, J., 2015. Learning English vocabulary in a mobile assisted language learning (MALL) environment: A sociocultural study of migrant women. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning. 11, 25–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/2202

[62] Syaifudin, M., 2017. The use of flashcards to enhance student’s speaking skill trough vocabulary mastery (A classroom action research for the members of Indonesia English club in the second semester of academic year 2016-2017). Jurnal Sainstech. 1(7), 33–38. Available from: https://sainstech.poltekindonusa.ac.id/index.php/view/article/view/22/21

[63] Weissheimer, J., Caldas, V., Marques, F., 2018. Using WhatsApp to develop L2 oral production. Revista Leitura, (60), pp. 21–38.

[64] Salhab, R., Daher, W., 2023. University students’ engagement in mobile learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education. 13(1), 202–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13010016

[65] Karakose, T., Yirci, R., Papadakis, S., 2021. Exploring the interrelationship between Covid-19 phobia, work–family conflict, family–work conflict, and life satisfaction among school administrators for advancing sustainable management. Sustainability. 13(15), 8654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158654

[66] Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., 2020. A research synthesis of the real value of self-proclaimed mobile educational applications for young children. In: Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M. (eds.). Mobile Learning Applications in Early Childhood Education. IGI Global: Beijing, China. pp. 1–19.

Downloads

How to Cite

Khan, R. M. I., Alharbi, M. A., & Radzuan, N. R. M. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Interactive M-Learning in Fostering EFL Vocabulary for Enhanced Speaking Proficiency. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(5), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.7068

Issue

Article Type

Review