-
3265
-
2352
-
1520
-
1224
-
1025
Exploring Vocabulary Learning Strategies and Beliefs Among Saudi Female EFL Undergraduates: A Case Study at Majmaah University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7315Abstract
Learning vocabulary effectively is still a major issue for many English language learners, enrolled in English programs at universities. These students have particular obstacles to their lexical development that stem from cultural customs, limited exposure to real world English communication situations outside of the classroom, and differences in their learning styles and aptitudes. This mixed-methods study aimed to examine vocabulary techniques and beliefs among students at Majmaah University, identify the vocabulary learning strategies employed by Saudi female undergraduate students, and examine variations in strategies between junior and senior levels. Finding helpful vocabulary-building strategies will assist maximize results, especially for this important learner population in the nation's educational system. A validated online survey explored participants' frequency and views about their preferred technique. The experiences of learners in vocabulary acquisition were then profoundly qualitatively revealed through further semi-structured interviews. Using dictionaries, cognitive inferencing, and activation emerged as the most common cognitive strategies, according to quantitative evaluation. Less often, metacognitive and social techniques were described. Qualitative research revealed strategic flexibility associated with the competency level and barriers to flexible language use related to ideological foundations. Saudi female undergrads demonstrated a greater reliance on direct memorization than on thoughtful approaches. Official regulations outlined certain acceptable language uses. To gradually increase vocabulary retention over time, educators might suggest experimenting with extra strategies and flexibility in pedagogical language activities.
Keywords:
Vocabulary Learning Strategies; Saudi Female EFL Undergraduates; Beliefs Towards Vocabulary Learning StrategiesReferences
[1] Schmitt, N., Zimmerman, C.B., 2002. Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly. 36(2), 145-171.
[2] Laufer, B., Nation, P., 2001. Passive vocabulary size and speed of meaning recognition: Are they related?. EUROSLA yearbook, 1(1), 7-28.
[3] Nation, P., 2019. The different aspects of vocabulary knowledge. In The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 15-29). Routledge.
[4] Kolaiti, P., Raikou, P., 2017. Does deeper involvement in lexical input processing during reading tasks lead to enhanced incidental vocabulary gain? Studies in English Language Teaching. 5(3), 406-428.
[5] Chen, C. C., Chen, L. Y., 2022. Exploring the effect of spatial ability and learning achievement on learning effect in VR assisted learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 25(3), 74-90.
[6] Rahimi, M., Allahyari, A., 2019. Effects of multimedia learning combined with strategy-based instruction on vocabulary learning and strategy use. Sage Open, 9(2), 2158244019844081.
[7] Li, R., Meng, Z., Tian, M., et al., 2021. Modelling Chinese EFL learners’ flow experiences in digital game-based vocabulary learning: The roles of learner and contextual factors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 483-505.
[8] Liu, J., Zhang, J., 2018. The effects of extensive reading on English vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. English language teaching, 11(6), 1-15.
[9] Cheng, H., Dörnyei, Z., 2007. The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research. 1(1), 153-174.
[10] Liang, J., Zhang, L. J., 2020. Effects of language proficiency and learner characteristics on willingness to communicate in the second language. System, p. 94, 102365.
[11] Lewyckyj, J. W., 2021. Cultivating innovation: An exploration of teacher professional identity and innovative work behavior in private catholic schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).
[12] Sari, S. N., Aminatun, D., 2021. Students’ Perception of the Use of English Movies to Improve Vocabulary Mastery. Journal of English language teaching and learning. 2(1), 16-22.
[13] Mahdi, H. S., Alkhammash, R., Al-Athwary, A. A., 2023. Using high variability phonetic training as a contextualized tool in developing English consonant clusters pronunciation among Saudi EFL learners. Education and Information Technologies. 29(6), 6821–6840.
[14] Chen, W. A. N. G., Yuhua, L. I. U., 2023. Measuring Vocabulary Use in Chinese Tertiary Textbooks: Potentials for Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 32.
[15] Pipes, A., 2023. Researching creativity in second language acquisition, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, USA. pp. page range.
[16] Krashen, S., 1992. The input hypothesis: An update. Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art, 409–431.
[17] Schmitt, N., 2019. Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment: A research agenda. Language Teaching. 52(2), 261-274.
[18] Liu, P. H. E., Wu, W. C. V., 2016. Exploring the Effectiveness of LINE for EFL Vocabulary and Reading. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15(13), 71-83.
[19] Al Qahtani, M. (2013). AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PREPARATORY YEAR PROGRAM IN LEARNING ENGLISH AMONG SAUDI STUDENT. In INTED2013 Proceedings (pp. 3715-3715). IATED.
[20] Alenezi, S. S. A., 2022. Implementing online blogging in EFL process-genre writing classes: exploring perceptions and attitudes of undergraduate learners of English in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Limerick).
[21] Al-Mansour, N. S., Almukhaizeem, Y. S., Alduais, A. M., 2015. On Arabic Abstract and Concrete Words Recall Using Free Recall Paradigms: Is It Abstractness, Concreteness, or Zero Effect. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 4, 154.
[22] Alghamdi, F. A. M., 2024. Exploring the effectiveness of technology-enhanced self-access language learning (SALL) amongst primary level EFL learners in Saudi Arabia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton)..
[23] Aljadid, R. I., Allawzi, A. K., 2024. Adopting Quranic Structures in Classical Literary Translation: Selected Parts of Jane Eyre as a Model. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies (IJAES), 24(1).
[24] Tseng, W. T., Dörnyei, Z., Schmitt, N., 2006. A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied linguistics. 27(1), 78-102.
[25] Gu, P. Y., Johnson, R.K., 1996. Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning. 46(4), 643-679.
[26] Oxford, R. L., Burry-Stock, J.A., 1995. Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System. 23(1), 1-23.
[27] Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (2009). Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice. Language, 13(2).
[28] Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N., 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, Sage Publications: California, USA.
[29] Ivankova, N.V., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Teaching mixed methods research: using a socio-ecological framework as a pedagogical approach for addressing the complexity of the field. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 21(4), 409-424.
[30] Almusharraf, A., Bailey, D., 2023. Machine translation in language acquisition: A study on EFL students' perceptions and practices in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 39(6), 1988-2003.
[31] Hadi, H.U.R., Guo, X., 2020. A survey of beliefs and vocabulary learning strategies adopted by EFL learners at Shaikh Zayed University. Cogent Education. 7(1), pp.33.
[32] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 3(2), 77–101.
[33] Jovchelovitch, S., Bauer, M.W., 2000. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound. Sage Publications: California, USA. pp. 69.
[34] Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher. 33(7), 14-26.
[35] Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Irvine, C.K., et al., 2014. Introduction to research in education, 9th ed.. Cengage Learning: Beijing, China. pp. 56.
[36] Merriam, S.B., 1998. Qualitative research and case study applications in education, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, USA.
[37] Sadikin, I.S., 2023. The Students and Teacher’s Perception of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Integration in EFL Teaching-Learning Practices. Linguistics and ELT Journal. 11(2), pp.12
[38] Okyar, H., 2023. University-level EFL students' views on learning English online: a qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies. 28(1), 81–107.
[39] Li, Y., Heron, M., 2021. English for General Academic Purposes or English for Specific Purposes? Language Learning Needs of Medical Students at a Chinese University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 11(6), 621-631.
[40] Azzahra, S., 2023. Exploring EFL Teacher’s experiences in creating joyful classroom management for Junior High School students: A narrative inquiry study (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung).
[41] Oxford, R.L., 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Issues in Applied Linguistics. 1(1), pp.42.
[42] Little, D., 2005. The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgments in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22(3), 321-336.
[43] Mayer, R.E., 2001. Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 44.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.