Mythopoetics as a Subject and Method of Literary Research

Authors

  • Zholaman Koblanov

    Department of Kazakh Philology, Caspian State University of Technology and Engineering named after Shakhmardan Yessenov, Aktau 130000, Kazakhstan

  • Aiymzhan Ryskiyeva

    Department of Religious Studies, Egyptian University of Islamic Culture Nur-Mubarak, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan

  • Aigul Amirbekova

    Lexicology Department, Institute of Linguistics named after A. Baitursynov. Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

  • Tatiana Ivashkina

    Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow 125993, Russia

  • Aliya Zhetkizgenova

    Department of Kazakh Philology, Caspian State University of Technology and Engineering named after Shakhmardan Yessenov, Aktau 130000, Kazakhstan

  • Rakhat Kosheva

    Department “World Languages”, Caspian State University of Technology and Engineering Named after Shakhmardan Yessenov, Aktau 130000, Kazakhstan

  • Raushan Kametova

    Department “World Languages”, Caspian State University of Technology and Engineering Named after Shakhmardan Yessenov, Aktau 130000, Kazakhstan

  • Oksana Chuksina

    Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), Moscow 125993, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.7545
Received: 20 November 2024 | Revised: 1 April 2025 | Accepted: 2 April 2025 | Published Online: 10 April 2025

Abstract

This study explores mythopoetics as both a subject and a method of literary research, offering a comprehensive analysis of its conceptual foundations, contemporary interpretations, and interdisciplinary applications. By examining the term’s evolution and the semiotic approaches used to define it, the article underscores the significance of mythopoetics in understanding the interplay between myth and literature. The absence of a unified definition for mythopoetics highlights not only terminological ambiguities but also the necessity for a cohesive framework that can accommodate its use across diverse fields, including literature, linguistics, cultural studies, folklore, historiography, philosophy, and psychology. As a subject of study, mythopoetics investigates the reception, transformation, and reinterpretation of myths in artistic works, revealing how authors draw on mythological models, images, and motifs to explore cultural, psychological, and symbolic dimensions. As a method of analysis, mythopoetics provides a powerful tool for interpreting literary texts, enabling researchers to uncover the deeper structures and meanings embedded in mythological elements. This approach facilitates the identification of intertextual and extratextual connections, shedding light on how myths evolve across historical and cultural contexts. The article argues that mythopoetics is not only a valid but also a highly effective framework for literary research, capable of revealing the intricate ways in which myths shape artistic expression. By integrating theoretical insights with practical applications, this study contributes to a clearer understanding of mythopoetics’ role in both literary scholarship and interdisciplinary research, offering new perspectives on the enduring relevance of myth in contemporary culture.

Keywords:

Literary Studies; Myth; Myth Reception; Myth Creation; Worldview

References

[1] Hall, R.W., 1967. On the myth of the metals in the republic. Apeiron. 1(2), 28–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.1967.1.2.28

[2] Torosyan, A.S., Zaytseva, I.A., Satina, T.V., 2022. The process of mythologization in contemporary literature. Vestnik of Voronezh State University. Series: Philology. 1, 82–85. (in Russian).

[3] Pogrebnaya, Y.V., 2013. On the components of mythopoetics and some principles of their identification. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice. 4(22), 150–154. (in Russian).

[4] Tolkien, J.R.R., 2001. Tree and Leaf: The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth: Beorhthelm’s Son. HarperCollins: London, UK. pp. 85–90.

[5] Lewis, C.S., 1946. The Great Divorce. Collins: UK.

[6] Toporov, V.N., 1995. Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: Studies in the Field of Mythopoetic. Progress: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).

[7] Krebel, I.A., 2010. Mythopoetics of the Silver Age. An Experience of Topological Reflection. Aleteya: St. Petersburg, Russia. (in Russian).

[8] Lévi-Strauss, C., 1964–1971. Mythologiques (Vols. 1–4). Plon: Paris, France. (in French).

[9] Eliade, M., 1954. The myth of the eternal return (W. R. Trask, Trans.). Princeton University Press: Prinston, NJ, USA.

[10] Soldatkina, Y.V., 2008. Mythopoetics of Russian epic prose of the 30–50s of the XX century: The problem of national worldview. RUDN Journal of Education: Languages and Speciality. 1, 107–114. (in Russian).

[11] Gadzhiev, A., 2018. Mythopoetics of Russian Prose: The Second Half of the XX Century. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany. (in Russian).

[12] Meletinsky, E.M., 2000. Poetics of Myth. Eastern Literature Publishing House of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).

[13] Kornienko, O.A., 2006. Mythopoetic Paradigm of Russian Prose of the 30s of the XX Century: Vectors of Aesthetic Search in Literature of the Metropolis and Abroad. Logos: Kyiv, Ukraine. (in Russian).

[14] Kozubovskaya, G.P., 2011. Turn of the XIX-XX Centuries: Myth and Mythopoetics. AltGPA: Barnaul, Russia. (in Russian).

[15] Polonsky, V.V., 2008. Mythopoetics and the Dynamics of Genre in Russian Literature at the End of the XIX - Beginning of the XX Century. Nauka: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).

[16] Kozolupenko, D.P., 2009. Mythopoetic Worldview. Canon+: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).

[17] Bokoveli, O.S., 2017. Mythopoetic Approach in the Study of Russian Literature. Tuva State University Publishing House: Kyzyl, Russia. (in Russian).

[18] Zhuravlev, A.I., 2001. New myth creation and the literature-centric era of Russian culture. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 9: Philology. 6, 35–42. (in Russian).

[19] Tokareva, G.A., 2006. Mythopoetic aspect of the artistic work: Problems of interpretation. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 6. Philology. 8, 58–66. (in Russian).

[20] Frye, N., 1963. Fables of identity: Studies in poetic mythology. Harcourt, Brace & World: New York, NY, USA.

[21] Bodkin, M., 1934. Archetypal Patterns in Poetry: Psychological Studies of Imagination. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[22] Slochower, H., 1970. Mythopoesis: Mythic Patterns in the Literary Classics. Wayne State University Press: Detroit, MI, USA.

[23] Ermolenko, O.V., 2020. “Myth creation” and “Individual-authorial myth creation”: The problem of demarcating concepts. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice. 13(3), 90–94. (in Russian).

[24] Mironov, A.V., 2010. Principles of researching the neo-mythological novel of the XX century (genre aspect). Vestnik of Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. 4(2), 903–906. (in Russian).

[25] Pashinina, D.P., 2001. The indeterminacy of myth and the specifics of organizing the mythopoetic picture of the worl. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 6. Philology. 6, 88–107. (in Russian).

[26] Gabrielyan, O.A., 2018. Mythopoetics of culture: Towards a possible research methodology. Scientific Notes of the V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political Science. Cultural Studies. 4(70(3)), 158–166. (in Russian).

[27] Pogrebnaya, Y.V., 2021. Current Problems of Contemporary Mythopoetics. Flinta: Moscow, Russia. (in Russian).

[28] Ivanov, V.V., Toporov, V.N., 1965. Slavic mythology: A linguistic reconstruction. In: Kramer, S.N. (ed.). Mythologies of the Ancient World. Anchor Books: New York, NY, USA. pp. 3–32.

[29] Lotman, Y.M., 1990. Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN, USA.

[30] Uspensky, B.A., 1994. The Poetics of Composition: The Structure of the Artistic Text and the Typology of Compositional Form. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA.

[31] Grass, G., 1959. The Tin Drum (R. Manheim, Trans.). Secker & Warburg: London, UK.

[32] Rowling, J.K., 1997–2007. Harry Potter series. Bloomsbury: London, UK.

[33] Martin, G.R.R., 1996. A Game of Thrones. Bantam Books: New York, NY, USA.

[34] Branagh, K. (Director), 2011. Thor [Film]. Marvel Studios; Paramount Pictures: Angeles, CA, USA.

[35] Tolkien, J.R.R., 1954–1955. The Lord of the Rings series. George Allen & Unwin: London, UK.

[36] Coogler, R. (Director), 2018. Black Panther [Film]. Marvel Studios: Burbank, CA, USA.

Downloads

How to Cite

Koblanov, Z., Ryskiyeva, A., Amirbekova, A., Ivashkina, T., Zhetkizgenova, A., Kosheva, R., Kametova, R., & Chuksina, O. (2025). Mythopoetics as a Subject and Method of Literary Research. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 468–476. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.7545