-
3265
-
2352
-
1520
-
1224
-
1025
Speech Manipulation in Motivational Business Lectures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7587Abstract
The purpose of the article is to investigate manipulative strategies in public business media discourse. Relevance of this issue is predetermined by the linguopragamitic potential of public business speech. It is necessary to reconise and counteract manipulative techniques which leads to the need for linguistic research into manipulative tactics and most vulnerable targets of manipulation. On the basis of a collection of business lectures, 295 speeches were selected by continuous sampling to analyse persuasive manipulation strategies in the sphere of public business speech. The main research method was functional-pragmatic analysis which helped to reveal manipulative effects and covert intentions of public business media discourse. The paper makes a contribution to pragmatic studies of verbal manipulation and highlights specific manipulative traits of public business lectures: different degrees of preparation of the audience and the presenter, expectation as an important cognitive factor, and applying manipulation models (gradation model, background model, evaluative model, and indirect model). In addition, the concept of business media discourse is analysed and the levers of manipulative influence in motivational discourse are identified (emotions, cognitive sphere, social instincts). The authors conclude that simplification and stereotyping underly the manipulative potential of motivational public speeches. Practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that it helps to identify the speech means used to carry out manipulative influence. The study bridges the gap in the analysis of manipulative means of emergent hybrid genres of business discourse and lays grounds for theoretical analysis of strategies to counter verbal manipulation.
Keywords:
Manipulation; Business Media Discourse; Speech Influence; Communication Strategies and Tactics; Functional and Pragmatic AnalysisReferences
[1] Malyuga, E.N., (Ed.). 2019. Functional approach to professional discourse exploration in linguistics. Springer: New York, NY, USA.
[2] Blagodeteleva, N.K., 2024. Development of skills and abilities of public speaking in English based on training technologies. World of Science, Culture, Education. 3(106), 34–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2024-3106-34-37
[3] Ponomarenko, E.V., 2011. Interethnic Business Communication: Persuasion or Manipulation? In: Issues of effectiveness of foreign language business communication. MRSU: Moscow, Russia. pp. 60–64.
[4] Joosse, P., Lu, Y., 2024. The concept that went viral: Using machine learning to discover charisma in the wild. The British Journal of Sociology. 1(1), 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468‐4446.1314618
[5] Van Dijk, T.A., 2006. Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse and Society. 17(2), 359–383.
[6] Mulholland, J., 2003. A Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK. pp. 1–432.
[7] Rahro, H.R., Jebelli, P., 2024. Critical discourse analysis of presidential candidates TV debates between Ebrahim Raisi and Abdolnaser Hemmati in Iran's 2021 presidential election. Social Sciences and Humanities Open. 10, 101040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101040
[8] Biriș, I., Drămnescu, B., 2014. Manipulation Techniques Analysis and its Effects in the Political Speech. Informare și Documentare: Activitate științifică și Profesională. 7, 142–151.
[9] David, M.K., 2014. Language, Power and Manipulation: The Use of Rhetoric in Maintaining Political Influence. Frontiers of Language and Teaching. 5(1), 164–170.
[10] Saul, J.M., 2024. Dogwhistles and Figleaves: How Manipulative Language Spreads Racism and Falsehood. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–240.
[11] Polyakova, L.S., Yuzhakova, Y.V., Zalavina, T.Y., et al., 2020. Linguistic Manipulation Means in English Political Discourse. Amazonia Investiga. 9(33), 27–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.33.09.3
[12] Ädel, A., Öhqvist, Å., Shokoohi, S., 2024. Sleep well in Småland, whether you prefer a castle or a hut: Performing persuasion through patterns of you in tourism discourse. Journal of Pragmatics. 233, 85–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.09.008
[13] Truba, H. Khrapatyi, S., Harashchuk, K., et al., 2024. Psycholinguistic underpinnings of image formation: Suggestion and manipulation in the educational network discourse. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 52, 101496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101496.
[14] Malyuga, E.N., McCarthy, M., 2021. “No” and “net” as response tokens in English and Russian business discourse: In search of a functional equivalence. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 25(2), 391–416.
[15] Gazizov, R., Dilmukhametova, A., 2023. Manipulation of the interlocutor in business communication situations (based on the material of German cinema). Filologičeskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 16, 1156–1161.
[16] Kubisch, M., 2023. ESG, Public Pensions, and Compelled Speech. Texas A&M Law Review. 11(1), 71–123.
[17] Tran, N.K.C., Ngueng, H.T.T., 2023. The Use of TED Talks to Enhance EFL Students' Public Speaking Skills. International Journal of Language and Literature. 3(1), 66–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24315
[18] Ryan, M., Dimas, P., 2023. Communicative functions used by TED talk speakers to attract their audiences. Khatulistiwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora. 3(1), 161–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55606/khatulistiwa.v3i1.1059
[19] Nisa, A., Sarfraz, Z., Alvi, U.F., 2023. A Linguistic Analysis of Technical and Non-Technical Language in TED talks on Science and Technology. CORPORUM: Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 6(2), 115–141.
[20] Foucault, M., 1966. The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (in French). Gallimard: Paris, France. pp. 1–416.
[21] Malyuga, E.N., 2019. Emergent trends in English scientific discourse: Issues of research relevance and linguistic identity. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, Filologiya. 58, 52–70.
[22] Fedorov, A. Levitskaya, A., 2020. Typology and Mechanisms of Media Manipulation. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy. 5(1), 69–78.
[23] Radyuk, A.V., Nikogosyan, M., 2023. Syntactic stylistic devices of speech manipulation in the English-language lifestyle media discourse. Wisdom. 26(2), 185–196.
[24] Atkinson, J., 2005. Metaspin: Demonisation of Media Manipulation. Political Science - POLIT SCI. 57(2), 17–27.
[25] Malyuga, E.N., 2023. A corpus-based approach to corporate communication research. Russian Journal of Linguistics. 27(1), 152–172.
[26] Radyuk, A.V., Khramchenko, D.S., 2020. Phraseological verbs as a means of increasing the expressiveness of mass media discourse. Modern Studies of Social Problems. 12(6), 197–210.
[27] Cabezas-García, M., 2021. Managing Corporate Terminology as an Internationalization Strategy: An Overview. In: Innovative Perspectives on Corporate Communication in the Global World. IGI Global Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA.
[28] Malyuga, E.N., Rimmer, W., 2021. Making sense of “buzzword” as a term through co-occurrences analysis. Heliyon. 7(6), e07208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07208
[29] Fitzpatrick, N., 2018. Media Manipulation 2.0: The Impact of Social Media on News, Competition, and Accuracy. Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications. 4(1), 45–62.
[30] Rozhdestvenskaya, E., Voronkova, A., 2022. Achievable femininity: a media representation of a successful professional career. The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 20(1), 37–52.
[31] Volkova, Y.A., Panchenko, N.N., 2024. Motivational speech: the specifics of the functioning of the speech genre. Genres of speech. 1(41), 47–55.
[32] Stefanova, E.V., 2024. The argumentative component of the superstructure of popular science speeches. Bulletin of Polotsk State University. Series A. Humanities. 70(2), 82–85.
[33] Csernica, R., 2024. Zero Equals One: Creating A Business From Nothing. Available from: https://tedxcharleston.org/watch/zero-equals-one-creating-a-business-from-nothing/ (cited 15 July 2024).
[34] Forth, P., 2024. Patrick Forth: Technology disruption meets the change monster...who wins? Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FUyLjyIba4 (cited 25 June 2024).
[35] Copos de Prada, A., 2023. Moonstar AI. Harvard President's Innovation Challenge Awards Ceremony. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_ScaUB5y0M (cited 26 June 2024).
[36] Radyuk, A.V., Feigina, R., Djagatspanyan, O.A., 2019. Metaphorical transfer in modern mass media discourse. Issues of Applied Linguistics. 3(35), 43–62.
[37] Sternin, I.A., 2001. Introduction to speech impact. Voronezh: Russia. pp. 1–252.
[38] Parshin, P.B., 2000. Speech influence and manipulation in advertising. In Advertising text. Semiotics and linguistics (pp. 55–75). Grebennikov Publishing House: Moscow, Russia. pp. 1–270.
[39] Kara-Murza, S.G., 2010. Manipulation of consciousness. Eksmo: Moscow, Russia. pp. 1–490.
[40] Dotsenko, E.L., 2000. Psychology of Manipulation: Phenomena, Mechanisms and Protection. Yurayt: Moscow, Russia. pp. 1–154.
[41] Chialdini, R., 2012. Psychology of influence. How to learn to persuade and achieve success. Eksmo Publ: Moscow, Russia. pp. 1–482.
[42] Jung, H., 2009. Information Manipulation Through the Media. Journal of Media Economics. 22, 188–210.
[43] Kurtz, H., 1998. Spin Cycle: How the White House and the Media Manipulate the News. Touchstone: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–346.
[44] Radyuk, A.V., Devyatnikova, K.G., 2021. Critical discourse analysis of stigmatized presuppositions in mass media. Issues of Applied Linguistics. 42, 67–88.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2024 Moussa Diagne Faye, Vini Yves Bernadin Loyara, Amadou Keita, Mamadou Diop, Angelbert Chabi Biaou, Mahamadou Koita, Hamma Yacouba
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.