Personalizing the Making of Technical Word Lists for Science and Technology Students: A Pedagogic Action Research Study

Authors

  • Ruchi Yadav

    Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (Pilani), Rajasthan 333031, India
  • Shakul Tewari

    Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (Hyderabad),
    Telangana 5000078, India
  • Vijayakumar Chintalapalli

    Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Birla Institute of Technology and Science (Pilani), Rajasthan 333031, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8194
Received: 23 December 2024 | Revised: 6 February 2025 | Accepted: 8 February 2025 | Published Online: 26 February 2025

Abstract

The challenge of meeting the diverse and specific vocabulary needs of students from different disciplines has been widely discussed in academic research. This paper explores how undergraduate students in science and engineering personalized the process of creating word lists for their academic needs. By using two corpus analysis tools—wordlist and concordance—available through the SketchEngine interface, the students were able to analyze an ad hoc corpus of texts relevant to their fields. Additionally, they assessed the technicality of words using a technicalness scale specifically developed for the purpose of this study. The data for the study consisted of the word lists that the students submitted, along with their notes, and transcriptions of individual student presentations on these word lists. The findings revealed that the students categorized words based on their technicality, considering both the specific context within their academic corpus and the broader meanings that these words could hold outside of their disciplines. In particular, students distinguished words based on their level of specialization and how these terms were understood in other fields. These results underscore the importance of a discipline-specific approach when teaching vocabulary in science and engineering programs. In conclusion, we discuss potential methods for teaching vocabulary to science and technology students, emphasizing the importance of personalized learning and context-based vocabulary development to support academic success.

Keywords:

EAP; Concordance; Peer-Discussion; Technicalness Scale; Word Lists

References

[1] Gardner, D., Davies, M., 2014. A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics. 35(3), 305-327.

[2] Hyland, K., Tse, P., 2007. Is there an "academic vocabulary"?. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly. 41(2), 235-253.

[3] Nation, I.S.P., 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 13-21, 217-235.

[4] Nation, I.S.P., 2016. Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. p. 116.

[5] Bi, J., 2020. How large a vocabulary do Chinese computer science undergraduates need to read English-medium specialist textbooks?. English for Specific Purposes. 58, 77-89.

[6] Coxhead, A., 2000. A new academic word list. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly. 34(2), 213-238.

[7] Coxhead, A., Demecheleer, M., 2018. Investigating the technical vocabulary of plumbing. English for Specific Purposes. 51, 84-97.

[8] Yang, M.N., 2015. A nursing academic word list. English for Specific Purposes. 37, 27-38.

[9] Li, Y., Qian, D.D., 2010. Profiling the Academic Word List (AWL) in a financial corpus. System. 38(3), 402-411.

[10] Masrai, A., Milton, J., 2018. Measuring the contribution of academic and general vocabulary knowledge to learners' academic achievement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 31, 44-57.

[11] Charles, M., 2012. ‘Proper vocabulary and juicy collocations': EAP students evaluate do-it-yourself corpus-building. English for Specific Purposes. 31(2), 93-102.

[12] Ackermann, K., Chen, Y.H., 2013. Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL) - A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12(4), 235-247.

[13] Valipouri, L., Nassaji, H., 2013. A corpus-based study of academic vocabulary in chemistry research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 12(4), 248-263.

[14] Biber, D., 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 1-50.

[15] Biber, D., Gray, B., 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 9(1), 2-20.

[16] Durrant, P., 2016. To what extent is the Academic Vocabulary List relevant to university student writing?. English for Specific Purposes. 43, 49-61.

[17] Jaidev, R., Chan, P., 2018. Embedding communication in the disciplines: A tale of two faculties. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 12(3), 199-211.

[18] El-Dakhs, D.A.S., 2018. Why are abstracts in PhD theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 36, 48-60.

[19] Yin, S., Gao, Y., Lu, X., 2021. Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System. 97, 102427.

[20] Bancroft-Billings, S., 2020. Identifying spoken technical legal vocabulary in a law school classroom. English for Specific Purposes. 60, 9-25.

[21] Muñoz, V.L., 2015. The vocabulary of agriculture semi-popularization articles in English: A corpus-based study. English for Specific Purposes. 39, 26-44.

[22] Anthony, L., 2020. AntConc. Available from: www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antconc/

[23] Kim, C., Crosthwaite, P., 2019. Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: Expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 41, 100775.

[24] Dang, T.N.Y., Coxhead, A., Webb, S., 2017. The academic spoken word list. Language Learning. 67(4), 959-997.

[25] Lei, L., Liu, D., 2016. A new medical academic word list: A corpus-based study with enhanced methodology. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 22, 42-53.

[26] Drayton, J., Coxhead, A., 2023. The development, evaluation and application of an aviation radiotelephony specialised technical vocabulary list. English for Specific Purposes. 69, 51-66.

[27] Ha, A.Y.H., Hyland, K., 2017. What is technicality? A technicality analysis model for EAP vocabulary. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 28, 35-49.

[28] Chung, T.M., Nation, P., 2003. Technical vocabulary in specialised texts. Reading in a Foreign Language. 15(2), 103-116.

[29] Chung, T.M., Nation, P., 2004. Identifying technical vocabulary. System. 32(2), 251-263.

[30] McLaughlin, E., Parkinson, J., 2018. ‘We learn as we go': How acquisition of a technical vocabulary is supported during vocational training. English for Specific Purposes. 50, 14-27.

[31] Kay, A.E., Hardy, J., Galloway, R.K., 2018. Learning from peer feedback on student-generated multiple-choice questions: Views of introductory physics students. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 14(1), 010119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010119

[32] Filius, R.M., de Kleijn, R.A.M., Uijl, S.G., et al., 2018. Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education. 125, 86-100.

[33] Yang, M., Badger, R., Yu, Z., 2006. A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing. 15(3), 179-200.

[34] Ertmer, P.A., Richardson, J.C., Belland, B., et al., 2007. Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 12(2), 412-433.

[35] Topping, K., 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research. 68(3), 249-276.

[36] Lubis, A.H., 2020. Corpus-driven genre pedagogy of English for research publication purposes: Toward an ELF-referenced critical teaching framework. International Journal of Education. 12(2), 109-121.

[37] Hussain, Z.D., 2021. Incorporating digital corpus analysis technology into English for Academic Purposes (EAP) lesson design for the Sri Lankan tertiary context: A self-experimentation by a ‘novice'. Advances in Technology. 1(3), 483-507.

[38] Ferdiansyah, S., Picard, M., 2024. Modeling expression of the research gap in text-based reading instruction: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Second Language Studies. 7(2), 295-319.

[39] Nesi, H., 2016. Corpus studies in EAP. In: Hyland, K., Shaw, P. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 206-217.

[40] Lee, D., Swales, J., 2006. A corpus-based EAP course for NNS doctoral students: Moving from available specialized corpora to self-compiled corpora. English for Specific Purposes. 25(1), 56-75.

[41] Burns, A., 2009. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: A Guide for Practitioners, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, USA. pp. 70-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863466

[42] Mckay S.L., 2006. Researching Second Language Classrooms, 1st ed. Routledge: New York, USA. pp. 45-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617378

[43] Gardner, S., 2012. Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 11(1), 52-63.

[44] Moreno, A.I., Swales, J.M., 2018. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes. 50, 40-63.

[45] Charles, M., 2011. Adverbials of result: Phraseology and functions in the Problem-Solution pattern. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10(1), 47-60.

[46] Zhao, H., Zhan, H., 2020. The use of genitive citations in academic writing. Lingua. 234, 102769.

[47] Chintalapalli, V., 2020. ‘Do-it-yourself' English courses for higher education. Journal of English Language Teaching. 62(2), 10-14.

[48] Charles, M., Hadley, G., 2022. Autonomous corpus use by graduate students: A long-term trend study (2009-2017). Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 56, 101095.

Downloads

How to Cite

Yadav, R., Tewari, S., & Chintalapalli, V. (2025). Personalizing the Making of Technical Word Lists for Science and Technology Students: A Pedagogic Action Research Study. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 1151–1015. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8194

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 2 (February 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Ruchi Yadav, Shakul Tewari, Vijayakumar Chintalapalli

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.