Sociolinguistic Analysis of Speech: How Speechwriters Create Persuasive Texts: Kazakh Speechwriter Abish Kekilbayev and American Speechwriter Jonathan Edward Favreau

Authors

  • Aidana Makhambetova

    Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan

  • Almagul Khabiyeva

    The Department of Lexicology, A. Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

  • Nursaule Rsaliyeva

    Terminology Center, A. Baitursynuly Institute of Linguistics, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan

  • Assemgul Yermekova

    Center for the Development of Languages, Zhangir Khan West Kazakhstan Аgrarian and Technical University, Uralsk 090009, Kazakhstan

  • Zhazira Issayeva

    Department of Kazakh Philology, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan 050063, Kazakhstan

  • Ainur Kembayeva

    Taraz Innovation Institute Named after Sh.Murtaza, Taraz 080000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8614
Received: 31 January 2025 | Revised: 22 February 2025 | Accepted: 13 March 2025 | Published Online: 23 March 2025

Abstract

This research paper presents a sociolinguistic analysis of speeches, with a focus on the persuasive writing techniques used by speechwriters. It compares the approaches of Kazakh speechwriter Abish Kekilbayev and American speechwriter Jonathan Edward Favreau, examining their contributions to political communication and the shaping of public opinion. The aim of this study is to explore the linguistic strategies and stylistic devices employed by Kekilbayev and Favreau in crafting impactful speeches. Special emphasis is placed on how cultural and linguistic contexts shape the political leaders’ identities through their speech texts. The research methodology includes sociolinguistic speech analysis, comparison of linguistic features, and textual data analysis to identify both shared elements and unique aspects of the two speechwriters’ approaches. This study offers a fresh perspective on the importance of speechwriters’ expertise in shaping political discourse, highlighting their critical role in contemporary political communication. Furthermore, the paper investigates key elements of rhetorical effectiveness, emotional appeal, lexical richness, syntactic structures, ideological framing, and discourse strategies that enhance persuasive power and audience engagement. Through the analysis of linguistic tools such as metaphor, parallelism, and repetition, the paper shows how speechwriters construct narratives that resonate with their audiences. Additionally, the study takes into account the historical and socio-political contexts that influence their rhetoric, providing insight into how speechwriting evolves within different cultural and political settings.

Keywords:

Sociolinguistic; Speechwriters; Persuasive; Abish Kekilbayev; Jonathan Edward Favreau

References

[1] Nazarbayev, N.A., 2014. Selected Speeches. Saryarka Publishing House: Astana, The Republic of Kazakhstan.

[2] Zhailau, B., 2022. A. Kekilbayuly–Speechwriter. Available from: https://adebiportal.kz/kz/news/view/abis-kekilbaiuly-speechwriter__23829 (cited 8 April 2025).

[3] Kuderinova, K., 2022. Traditional Spoken Language in the Works of Kazakh Writers. Tiltanym. 4(88), 26–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2022-4-26-33.

[4] Ryshina‐Pankova, M., 2011. Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources: Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing. 20(4), 243–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.011.

[5] Salih, A.A., 2021. Investigating Rhetorical Aspects of Writing Argumentative Essays and Persuasive Posters: Students' Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 11(12), 1571–1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1112.09.

[6] Tan, H., Eng, W.B., 2014. Metadiscourse use in the persuasive writing of Malaysian undergraduate students. Canadian Center of Science and Education. 7(7), 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n7p26.

[7] Duerr, S., Lange, K.T., Gloor, P.A., 2021. What makes a message persuasive? Identifying adaptations towards persuasiveness in nine exploratory case studies. Cornell University. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2104.12454.

[8] Tan, C., Niculae, V., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., et al., 2016. Winning Arguments: Interaction Dynamics and Persuasion Strategies in Good-faith Online Discussions. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web; April 11–April 15, 2016; Montréal Québec, Canada. pp. 613–624.

[9] Hyland, K., 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7(2), 173–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365.

[10] Bauer, G.M., 1927. Persuasive methods in the Lincoln‐Douglas debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech. 13(1), 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335632709379660.

[11] Meiirbekov, A.K., Yelikbayev, B.K., Meirbekov, A., et al., 2015. Sociolinguistic aspects of the speech act of greeting in the Kazakh and English languages. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 6(6), 267–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n6s2p267.

[12] Raymond, G., 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. Language in Society. 68(6), 939–975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519752.

[13] Nguyen, D., Doğruöz, A.S., Rosé, C.P., et al., 2016. Computational sociolinguistics: A survey. Computational Linguistics. 42(3), 537–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00258.

[14] Kamaladdini, B., Seied, M., 2015. Abai and Firdowsi. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences. 51, 147–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.51.147.

[15] Sheryazdanova, G.R., Zhanarstanova, M., Kulzhanova, J.T., 2023. Impact of constitutional reforms on the political participation of citizens in Kazakhstan. Journal of Social Sciences. 142(1), 120–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6887/2023-142-1-120-135.

[16] Dossanova, N., Abdimanuly, O., Kapağan, E., 2020. The influence of Akhmet Baitursynov's literary publicistic heritage on the spiritual development of Kazakh people at the beginning of the 20th century. Journal of Turkish Studies. 9(4), 286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i4.2669.

[17] Fengjie, L., 2016. Analysis of the rhetorical devices in Obama's public speeches. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 4(4), 141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20160404.11.

[18] Theodoropoulou, I., 2020. Speech style as political capital: Barack Obama's Athens speech. Journal of Language & Politics. 15(3), 325–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2020.1800715.

Downloads

How to Cite

Makhambetova, A., Khabiyeva, A., Rsaliyeva, N., Yermekova, A., Issayeva, Z., & Kembayeva, A. (2025). Sociolinguistic Analysis of Speech: How Speechwriters Create Persuasive Texts: Kazakh Speechwriter Abish Kekilbayev and American Speechwriter Jonathan Edward Favreau. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8614