Epistemological Transformation of the Paradigm of Literary Studies in the Context of the Integration of Digital Humanities Methods

Authors

  • Moldir Amangazykyzy

    Department of Kazakh language and literature, A.K. Kussayinov Eurasian Humanities Institute, Astana 010009, Kazakhstan
  • Aigerim Gilea

    Department of Foreign Language and Translation Studies, A.K. Kussayinov Eurasian Humanities Institute, Astana 010009, Kazakhstan
  • Aubakirova Karlygash

    Department of Kazakh Philology and Journalism, Shakarim University of Semey, Semey 071412, Kazakhstan
  • Abisheva Nurziya

    Department of Humanities, Nur-Mubarak Egyptian University of Islamic culture, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan
  • Kulanova Sandygash

    Department of General Education, «Q» University, Almaty 05000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8619
Received: 31 January 2025 | Revised: 11 March 2025 | Accepted: 21 March 2025 | Published Online: 27 March 2025

Abstract

The epistemological transformation of literary studies in the context of digital humanities and the post-humanities shift challenges traditional hermeneutic paradigms, requiring a fundamental reconsideration of literariness, authorship, and textuality. This article explores the impact of distant reading and computational methodologies on contemporary literary analysis, particularly within postcolonial and feminist criticism. By integrating large-scale textual analysis with AI-driven methods, distant reading unveils new historical, structural, and thematic patterns while simultaneously raising critical concerns regarding representation, data selection, and algorithmic biases. The study examines how digital humanities methodologies, such as sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and network analysis, reshape the interpretation of gender and race in literary history. Case studies demonstrate how AI-assisted literary analysis reveals structural imbalances in representation, while feminist and decolonial critiques highlight the ethical imperatives of corpus formation, algorithmic transparency, and epistemic inclusivity. The findings underscore the methodological and ideological tensions between computational literary studies and traditional close reading approaches, advocating for a hybrid model that integrates quantitative insights with hermeneutic depth.Ultimately, this article argues that digital methodologies not only expand the analytical scope of literary research but also redefine the epistemological foundations of the discipline. The intersection of distant reading with feminist and decolonial critique destabilizes canonical hierarchies, urging scholars to critically engage with the political dimensions of digital research. By foregrounding the ethical challenges of AI-driven analysis, this study contributes to ongoing debates on the future of literary studies in the digital age, advocating for a more inclusive, interdisciplinary, and critically reflexive approach to literary scholarship.

Keywords:

Digital Humanities; Distant Reading; Feminist Criticism; Decolonial Studies; AI in Literary Analysis; Epistemology of Literature; Post-Humanities

References

[1] Epstein, M.N., 2019. Budushchee gumanitarnykh nauk: tekhnogumanizm, kreativnost', proteizm [The Future of the Humanities: Technohumanism, Creativity, Proteism]. RIPOL klassik: Moscow, Russia. p. 480.

[2] Moretti, F., 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. Verso: London, UK. p. 119.

[3] Moretti, F., 2013. Distant Reading. Verso: London, UK. p. 239.

[4] Smith, B.H., 1988. Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. p. 286.

[5] Jockers, M.L., 2013. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA. p. 208.

[6] Jockers, M.L., 2017. Text Analysis with R for Students of Literature. Springer: New York, NY, USA. p. 260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97274-7

[7] Piper, A., Salinger, R., 2017. Gendered Patterns in English-Language Fiction: A Computational Approach // Modern Language Quarterly. 78(4). 512–537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00267929-2017-001

[8] Xu, T., Xiao, Y., Keller, J., et al., 2024. From “One Husband” to “Multiple Babies”: The Analysis of Emotional Displacement in Female-Oriented Web Novels from a Digital Humanities Perspective. Chinese Literature and Thought Today. 55(3), 46–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/27683524.2024.2420586

[9] Karpouzis, K.A., 2015. Digital Humanities, and the Legacies of Colonial Power. Preprints. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202502.1823.v1

[10] Nagaraj, A., Kejriwal, M., 2022. Robust Quantification of Gender Disparity in Pre-Modern English Literature using Natural Language Processing // Digital Scholarship in the Humanities. 37(1), 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab012

[11] Hepworth, K.J., Church, C., 2024. Racism in the Machine: Visualization Ethics in Digital Humanities Projects. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.17704 (cited 7 March 2025).

[12] Rhody, L., 2013. Topic Modeling and the Cultural Geography of Modernism. Journal of Modernist Studies. 9(1), 47–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/mod.2013.0095

[13] D’Ignazio, C., Klein, L., 2020. Data Feminism. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA. p.328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11805.001.0001

[14] Drucker, J., 2011. Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display. Digital Humanities Quarterly. 5(1). 1−21.

[15] Leavy, S., Siapera, E., O'Sullivan, B., 2021. Ethical Data Curation for AI: An Approach Based on Feminist Epistemology and Critical Theories of Race. Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 21–23 October 2024. San Jose, CA. pp. 695–703.

[16] Visconti, A., 2017. Archival Silences in the Digital Humanities: Computational Gaps and Feminist Epistemology. Journal of Cultural Analytics. 7(3), 234–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22148/16.025

[17] Klein, L., 2014. The Image of Absence: Archival Silence, Data Visualization, and James Hemings. American Literature. 85(4), pp. 661–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370212

[18] Moretti, F., 2020. The Limits of Distant Reading: Literary Genres and Cultural Complexity. Comparative Literature Studies. 57(1), 101–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cls.2020.0011

[19] Klein, L., 2016. The Trouble with Binary Thinking: Gender Representation in Computational Literary Studies. Digital Humanities Quarterly. 10(2), 119.

[20] Allison, S., 2017. Redefining Close and Distant Reading in the Digital Humanities. PMLA. 132(3), 89–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2017.132.3.89

[21] Risam, R., 2019. New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis, and Pedagogy. Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL, USA. p. 200.

[22] Kim, D., 2018. Precarious Labor and the Digital Humanities. American Quarterly. 70(3), 549–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2018.0032

[23] Cooney, J., Min, J., 2020. Mapping Postcolonial Narratives: A Network Approach to World Literature. Journal of Literary Digital Studies. 12(2), 35–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31810/2618-7886-2020-2-35-57

[24] Heuser, R., Le-Khac, L.A., 2012. Quantitative Literary History of 2,958 Nineteenth-Century Novels. Stanford Literary Lab Pamphlet Series. 4, 1–28.

[25] Gonzalez, L.M., 2019. Translation Networks of African Literature in the Global Market. Translation Studies Quarterly. 42(1), 55–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tsq/42.1.55

Downloads

How to Cite

Amangazykyzy, M., Gilea, A., Karlygash, A., Nurziya, A., & Sandygash, K. (2025). Epistemological Transformation of the Paradigm of Literary Studies in the Context of the Integration of Digital Humanities Methods. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8619

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 4 (April 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Review

License

Copyright © 2025 Moldir Amangazykyzy, Aigerim Gilea, Aubakirova Karlygash, Abisheva Nurziya, Kulanova Sandygash

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.