The Correlation between First and Second Language Strategies and Reading Comprehension among Chinese International Students in an Online Reading Environment

Authors

  • Jiaxin Du

    School of Education, University of Sheffield, Western Bank S10 2TN, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.8668
Received: 6 February 2025 | Revised: 1 April 2025 | Accepted: 9 April 2025 | Published Online: 23 April 2025

Abstract

With the ongoing globalisation and digitisation of education, the proportion of Chinese international students in UK higher education has significantly increased. This research investigates 1) how these students’ first language (L1) and second language (L2) online reading strategies differ, 2) how L1 and L2 proficiency affects strategy choice, and 3) how these strategies affect reading comprehension performance. Adopting a positivist paradigm, this study used Struck and Jiang’s Lexical Decision Tasks (LDTs), Anderson’s Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS), and reading comprehension tests. Data were collected from 50 Chinese international students at the University of Sheffield via the Gorilla platform. Results showed that 1) online reading strategies differed significantly between L1 and L2. Participants used global reading strategies more frequently when reading in L1 and relied more on problem-solving and support reading strategies in L2. 2) Higher L1 proficiency predicted more frequent use of global and problem-solving strategies in L1 reading. Conversely, higher L2 proficiency predicted a greater frequency of using problem-solving and support reading strategies in L2 reading. 3) Reading comprehension scores were strongly influenced by strategy use. Frequent use of global and problem-solving strategies was positively correlated with better L1 comprehension performance, while support reading strategies were negatively correlated. In L2 reading, regular use of problem-solving and support reading strategies significantly enhanced comprehension performance. This study enriches the theoretical framework concerning how reading strategies and L1/L2 proficiency affect comprehension performance and validates related measurement scales, providing insights for cross-cultural education for international students.

Keywords:

L1 proficiency; L2 proficiency; Reading Strategy Selection; Reading Comprehension Performance

References

[1] Study in the UK, 2023. International student statistics in UK 2023. Avaialble from: https://www.studying-in-uk.org/international-student-statistics-in-uk/ (cited 14 May 2024).

[2] Grosjean, F., 2012. Bilingual: Life and Reality. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[3] Cummins, J., 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire, 1st ed. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK.

[4] Ellis, R., 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[5] Richards, J.C., Schmidt, R.W., 2010. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4th ed. Longman: London, UK.

[6] Sharples, R., 2023. What do we mean when we say “EAL”? In: Brooks, G., Clenton, J., Fraser, S. (eds.). EAL Research for the Classroom. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 14–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003274889

[7] Dixon, M., (2019, June 28). Reading comprehension: illustrations help us get the picture. TES Magazine. Avaialble from: https://www.tes.com/magazine/archived/reading-comprehension-illustrations-help-us-get-picture (cited 30 April 2024).

[8] Koda, K., 2005. Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[9] Alderson, J.C., 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[10] Van Der Weel, A., Mangen, A., 2022. Textual reading in digitised classrooms: Reflections on reading beyond the internet. International Journal of Educational Research. 115, 102036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102036

[11] Huang, R., Turner, R., 2018. International experience, universities support and graduate employability - perceptions of Chinese international students studying in UK universities. Journal of Education and Work. 31(2), 175–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2018.1436751

[12] Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Romiti, A., 2024. International student applications in the UK after Brexit. Journal of Economic Geography. 24(5), 637–662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbae019

[13] Universities UK, (2023, May 16). International students boost UK economy by £41.9 billion. Avaialble from: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/latest/news/international-students-boost-uk-economy (cited 14 May 2024).

[14] Beech, S.E., 2019. The Geographies of International Student Mobility: Spaces, Places and Decision-Making. Springer: Berlin, Germany.

[15] Universities UK, (2023, October 4). International facts and figures 2022. Universities UK. Avaialble from: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/universities-uk-international/insights-and-publications/uuki-publications/international-facts-and-figures-2022 (cited 14 May 2024).

[16] Zhou, Y., Todman, J., 2009. Patterns of adaptation of Chinese postgraduate students in the United Kingdom. Journal of Studies in International Education. 13(4), 467–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308317937

[17] Smith, R.A., Khawaja, N.G., 2011. A review of the acculturation experiences of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 35(6), 699–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.08.004

[18] Bodycott, P., Lai, A., 2012. The influence and implications of Chinese culture in the decision to undertake cross-border higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education. 16(3), 252–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315311418517

[19] Montgomery, C., McDowell, L., 2009. Social networks and the international student experience: An international community of practice? Journal of Studies in International Education. 13(4), 455–466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315308321994

[20] Odlin, T., 2003. Cross-linguistic influence. In: Doughty, C.J., Long, M.H. (eds.). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK. pp. 436–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492

[21] Koda, K., 2005. Learning to read across writing systems: Transfer, metalinguistic awareness, and second language reading development. In: Cook, V., Bassetti, B. (eds.). Second Language Writing Systems. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp. 311–334. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597954-014

[22] Ortega, L., 2014. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203777282

[23] Berry, J.W., 1997. Acculturation and adaptation. In: Berry, J.W., Segall, M.H., Kagitcibasi, C. (eds.). Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology. Allyn & Bacon: pp. 291–326.

[24] Fantini, A.E., 2020. Reconceptualizing intercultural communicative competence: A multinational perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education. 15(1), 52–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920901948

[25] Struck, J., Jiang, N., 2021. Language switch costs in a lexical decision task: Symmetry and cognitive correlates. Second Language Research. 38(4), 813–838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658321998740

[26] Perfetti, C.A., Hart, L., 2002. The lexical quality hypothesis. Language and Reading. pp. 189-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.11.14per

[27] Shohamy, E., Or, I.G., May, S., 2017. Language Testing and Assessment. Springer: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 441–454.

[28] Perfetti, C.A., 1985. Reading Ability. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[29] Cummins, J., 1981. Age on arrival and immigrant second language learning in Canada: A Reassessment1. Applied Linguistics. 2(2), 132–149.

[30] Goodman, K.S., 1967. Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction. 6(4), 126–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976

[31] Ahmadi, M.R., Ismail, H.N., Abdullah, M.K.K., 2013. The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching. 6(10), 235–244. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1077125

[32] Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., et al., 2021. The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology. 42(3), 214–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348

[33] Rumelhart, D.E., 1980. On evaluating story grammars. Cognitive Science. 4(3), 313–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0403_5

[34] Blasi, D.E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., et al., 2022. Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 26(12), 1153–1170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.015

[35] Msaddek, M., 2024. Moroccan EFL university students’ reliance on goal-setting and background knowledge in processing English (L3) written texts: An exploratory case study. European Journal of Education Studies. 11(3), 115–131.

[36] Gough, P.B., Kavanagh, J.F., Mattingly, I.G., 1972. One Second of Reading. MIT Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 331–358.

[37] Lawrence, J.F., Knoph, R., McIlraith, A., et al., 2022. Reading comprehension and academic vocabulary: Exploring relations of item features and reading proficiency. Reading Research Quarterly. 57(2), 669–690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.434

[38] LaBerge, D., Samuels, S.J., 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology. 6(2), 293–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2

[39] Mittal, S., Lamb, A., Goyal, A., et al., 2020. Learning to Combine Top-Down and Bottom-Up Signals in Recurrent Neural Networks with Attention over Modules. Proceedings of The International Conference on Machine Learning; July 13–18, 2020; Vienna, Austria. pp. 6972–6986.

[40] Rumelhart, D.E., 1977. Toward an interactive model of reading. In: Dornic̆, S. (ed.). Attention and Performance VI, 1st ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003309734

[41] Farris, E.A., Cristan, T., Bernstein, S.E., et al., 2021. Morphological awareness and vocabulary predict reading resilience in adults. Annals of Dyslexia. 71(2), 347–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00236-y

[42] Stanovich, K.E., 1980. Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly. 16(1), 32–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/747348

[43] Kintsch, W., 1988. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review. 95(2), 163.

[44] McNamara, D.S., Magliano, J., 2009. Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 51, 297–384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2

[45] Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., 2011. The unique role of the visual word form area in reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15(6), 254–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003

[46] Heim, S., Pape-Neumann, J., van Ermingen-Marbach, M., et al., 2015. Shared vs. specific brain activation changes in dyslexia after training of phonology, attention, or reading. Brain Structure and Function. 220, 2191–2207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0784-y

[47] Price, C.J., Devlin, J.T., 2011. The interactive account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15(6), 246–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001

[48] Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Monzalvo, K., Dehaene, S., 2018. The emergence of the visual word form: Longitudinal evolution of category-specific ventral visual areas during reading acquisition. PLoS Biology. 16(3), e2004103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004103

[49] Pearson, P.D., Gallagher, M.C., 1983. The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 8(3), 317–344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X

[50] Pressley, M., Afflerbach, P., 2012. Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203052938

[51] Flavell, J.H., 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 34(10), 906–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

[52] Villanueva, J.M., 2022. Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education. 9(1), 2061683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683

[53] Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C.A., 2002. Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(2), 249–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.249

[54] Sheorey, R., Mokhtari, K., 2001. Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System. 29(4), 431–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2

[55] Afriani, Z.L., Anggraini, M., Riswanto, R., 2020. The effect of Question Answer Relationship (QAR) Strategy in enhancing students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching. 4(4), 548–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.4.4.548-558

[56] Azmuddin, R.A.A., Nor, N.F.M., Hamat, A., 2020. Facilitating online reading comprehension in enhanced learning environment using digital annotation tools. IAFOR Journal of Education. 8(2), 7–27. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265756

[57] Anderson, N.J., 2003. Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix. 3(3), 1–33.

[58] Jusoh, Z., Abdullah, L., 2015. Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ online reading in academic context. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education. 17(2), 67–81.

[59] Öztürk, S.Y., 2018. Use of metacognitive online reading strategies by student teachers of English. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 3(3), 17–32.

[60] Li, J., 2020. Development and validation of second language online reading strategies inventory. Computers & Education. 145, 103733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103733

[61] Pardede, P., 2022. Online Reading Strategies in EFL: A Review. Journal of English Teaching. 8(2), 329–339. DOI: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1355554

[62] Bresó-Grancha, N., Jorques-Infante, M.J., Moret-Tatay, C., 2022. Reading digital- versus print-easy texts: A study with university students who prefer digital sources. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 35, 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-022-00212-4

[63] Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., 2003. Language proficiency and reading ability in first‐and second‐language learners. Reading Research Quarterly. 38(1), 78–103. DOI: htttps://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.4

[64] Taki, S., 2016. Metacognitive online reading strategy use: Readers’ perceptions in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading. 39(4), 409–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12048

[65] Lieder, F., Griffiths, T.L., 2020. Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 43, e1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1900061X

[66] Fitrisia, D., Kok, E.T., Yusuf, Y.Q., 2015. Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students’ performance in reading comprehension. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education (Formerly Known as Journal of Educators and Education). 30(1), 1–16.

[67] Tavakoli, H., 2014. The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Reading. 14(2), 314–336.

[68] Kuo, Y.L., Yu, P.S., 2014. L1 and L2 online reading strategy usage of advanced Chinese learners. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching. 5(1), 1–17.

[69] Tavakoli, M., Tavakol, M., 2018. Problematizing EAP education in Iran: A critical ethnographic study of educational, political, and sociocultural roots. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 31, 28–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.007

[70] Reed, D.K., Vaughn, S., 2012. Retell as an indicator of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading. 16(3), 187–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.538780

[71] Kessler, M., Ma, W., Solheim, I., 2022. The effects of topic familiarity on text quality, complexity, accuracy, and fluency: A conceptual replication. Tesol Quarterly. 56(4), 1163–1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3096

[72] Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B., 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 52(3–4), 591–611.

[73] Jeon, E.H., Yamashita, J., 2014. L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language learning. 64(1), 160–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034

[74] Birch, B.M., Fulop, S., 2020. English L2 Reading: Getting to the Bottom. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429397783

[75] Grabe, W., Stoller, F.L., 2019. Teaching and Researching Reading, 3rd ed. Routledge: London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274

[76] Koda, K., Miller, R.T., 2018. Cross-linguistic interaction in L2 word meaning inference in English as a foreign language. In: Pae, H.K. (ed.). Writing Systems, Reading Processes, and Cross-Linguistic Influences: Reflections from the Chinese, Japanese and Korean Languages. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 293–312.

[77] Ke, S., Chan, S.D., 2017. Strategy use in L2 Chinese reading: The effect of L1 background and L2 proficiency. System. 66, 27–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.005

[78] Habók, A., Magyar, A., 2019. The effects of EFL reading comprehension and certain learning-related factors on EFL learners’ reading strategy use. Cogent Education. 6(1), 1616522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1616522

[79] Carrell, P.L., 1989. Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal. 73(2), 121–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/326568

[80] Oxford, R.L., 2016. Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies: Self-Regulation in Context. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719146

[81] Par, L., 2020. The relationship between reading strategies and reading achievement of the EFL students. International Journal of Instruction. 13(2), 223–238.

[82] Zhang, L., Seepho, S., 2013. Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 10(1), 54–69.

Downloads

How to Cite

Du, J. (2025). The Correlation between First and Second Language Strategies and Reading Comprehension among Chinese International Students in an Online Reading Environment. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(5), 148–180. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.8668

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 5 (May 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Jiaxin Du

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.