Zhuangzi and Plato: Language and the World, the World of Language

Authors

  • Raz Shpeizer

    Department, Kaye Academic College of Education, Be’er-Sheva 8414201, Israel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8761
Received: 16 February 2025 | Revised: 20 March 2025 | Accepted: 28 March 2025 | Published Online: 31 March 2025

Abstract

This article inquires into the philosophies of language of Plato and Zhuangzi while placing special emphasis on the delicate and complex interplay between the ways they understand language and their worldviews and writing methods. It is argued that Plato is a linguistic realist who assumes language reflects an objective reality. Zhuangzi, in contrast, is a linguistic conventionalist and skeptic, holding that language constructs rather than reflects the world. Through a comparative philosophical lens, the paper analyzes how linguistic structures and cultural context shaped those thinkers’ perspectives and uses Jacques Derrida’s logocentrism critique and Chad Hansen’s mass nouns theory to better explain their linguistic-philosophical views. The study employs philosophical content and linguistic-textual analysis to highlight how their different traditions influenced their understanding of language. Despite the paper’s claim that Plato and Zhuangzi differ significantly in their perception of language, it also points to a shared important theme: Both philosophers use literary and rhetorical devices. This means that for the two of them, knowledge is not only captured in propositional statements but is also sculpted through style and expression. By exposing the profound interest of those major ancient philosophers in language and its relation to the world, the study shows that language and philosophy of language were already significant themes in the early days of world philosophy. By delving into a cross-cultural dialogue, the study suggests a refreshed vantage point on how language functions in various philosophical frameworks and on the discourse of the relationship between language, meaning, and reality.

Keywords:

Comparative Philosophy; Philosophy of Language; Realism; Conventionalism; Plato’s Theory of Language; Zhuangzi and Language

References

[1] Li, C., 2016. Comparative philosophy and cultural patterns. Dao. 15(4), 533–546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S11712-016-9519-5.

[2] Balslev, A., 1997, Philosophy and cross‐cultural conversation: Some comments on the project of comparative philosophy. Metaphilosophy. 28(4), 359–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00065.

[3] Scharfstein, B.A., 1998. A comparative history of world philosophy: from the Upanishads to Kant. SUNY Press: Albany, NY, USA.

[4] Fraser, C., 2007. Language and ontology in early Chinese thought. Philosophy East and West. 57(4), 420–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2007.0045

[5] Zhuang, Z., 1968. The complete work of Zhuangzi. Watson B, translator. Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[6] Plato, 1921. Sophist. In: Plato in twelve volumes, Vol. 12. Translated by Fowler HN. Harvard University Press: London, UK.

[7] Coutinho, S., 2014. Conceptual analyses of the Zhuangzi. In Dao companion to Daoist philosophy. Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands. pp. 159–192.

[8] Graham, A.C., 1989. Disputers of the Tao. Open Court: Chicago, IL, USA.

[9] Graham, A.C., 2001. Chuang-Tzu: The inner chapters. Hackett: Indianapolis, IN, USA.

[10] Aristotle, 1984. On Interpretation. Translated by Ackrill JL. In: Barnes, J., ed. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Vol. 1. Princeton University Press: Princeton, UK. pp. 25–38.

[11] Kotzia, P., Chriti, M., 2014. Ancient philosophers on language. In: Giannakis G, Bubenik V, Crespo E, et al., editors. The Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics. Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands; Boston, USA. pp. 124–133.

[12] Needham, J., 1956. Science and Civilization in China. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[13] Botz-Bornstein, T., 2022. Zhuangzi, Language and Gender. Philosophy Now. 150, 36–39.

[14] Fraser, C., 2024. School of Names. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA.

[15] Plato, 1921. Cratylus. In: Plato in twelve volumes. Translated by Fowler HN. Harvard University Press: London, UK.

[16] Ademollo, F., 2015. Ancient Greek Philosophy. Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language. 33, 33–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732495.003.0003

[17] Robinson, R., 1969. Essays in Greek philosophy. Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK.

[18] Sedley, D., 2003. Plato's Cratylus. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[19] Roupa, V., 2020. Naming as technē in Cratylus. In: Baracchi C, editor. The Bloomsbury Companion to Plato. Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 23–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52127-1_2

[20] Barney, R., 2001. Names and nature in Plato's Cratylus. Routledge: London, UK.

[21] Plato, 1967. Euthydemus. In Plato in twelve volumes, Vol. 3. Translated by Lamb WRM. William Heinemann Ltd.: London, UK.

[22] Scolnicov, S., 2006. Language and dialogue in Plato. Classica-Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos. 19(2), 180–186. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/6017/601770884002.pdf

[23] Foley, S., 2022. Sophistic speech and false statements in Plato's Sophist. Illinois Classical Studies. 47(2), 383-405. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/916493

[24] Bluck, R.S., 1957. False statement in the Sophist. The Journal of Hellenic Studies. 77(2), 181–186. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/629356

[25] Frede, M., 1992. Plato's Sophist on false statements. In: Kraut R, editor. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge University Press: New York, USA. pp. 397–424.

[26] Wiggins, D., 1971. Sentence, meaning, negation, and Plato's problem of non-being. In: Gregory, V., ed. Plato, collection of critical essays: 1: Metaphysics and epistemology. Anchor Books: New York, USA. pp. 268–303.

[27] Hunt, D.P., 2003. Form and flux in the Theaetetus and Timaeus. The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter. 359. Available from: https://orb.binghamton.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=sagp

[28] Griffith, J., 2017. From leaky pots to spillover-goblets: Plato and Zhuangzi on the responsiveness of knowledge. Dao. 16(2), 221–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-017-9548-8

[29] Mouzala, M.G., 2019. Logos as “weaving together or communion of indications about ousia” in Plato's Sophist. Platonic Investigations. 10(1), 35–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25985/PI.10.1.03

[30] Hamlyn, D.W., 1955. The communion of forms and the development of Plato's logic. Philosophical Quarterly. 5(21), 289–302.

[31] Hansen, C., Summer 2024. Zhuangzi. In: Zalta EN, Nodelman U, editors. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Edition. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2024/entries/zhuangzi/

[32] Hansen, C., 1983. Language and logic in ancient China. The University of Michigan Press: Michigan, USA.

[33] Hansen, C.A., 1992. Daoist theory of Chinese thought: A philosophical interpretation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, New York, USA.

[34] Moeller, H.G., 2004. Daoism explained: From the dream of the butterfly to the fishnet allegory. Open Court: Chicago, IL, USA.

[35] Vrubliauskaitė, A., 2014. Language in Zhuangzi: How to say without saying? International Journal of Area Studies. 9(1), 75–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijas-2014-0005

[36] Ziporyn, B., 2009. Zhuangzi: The essential writings with selections from traditional commentaries. Hackett Publishing: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

[37] Yang, G., 2008. Names and words in the philosophy of Zhuangzi. Frontiers of Philosophy in China. 3, 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11466-008-0001-2

[38] Porat, R., 2022. Language in the Zhuangzi. In: Chong, K.C., ed. Dao companion to the philosophy of the Zhuangzi. Vol. 16. Springer Nature; pp. 237–267. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-92331-0

[39] Yearly, L., 1983. The perfected person in the radical Chuang Tzu. In: Mair VH, editor. Experimental essays on Chuang Tzu. University of Hawaii Press: Hawaii. pp. 125–139.

[40] Kjellberg, P., 1996. Sextus Empiricus, Zhuangzi, and Xunzi. In: Ivanhoe PJ, Kjellberg P, editors. Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA. pp. 1–26.

[41] Raphals, L., 1996. Skeptical strategies in the Zhuangzi and Theaetetus. In: Ivanhoe PJ, Kjellberg P, editors. Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA. pp. 26–42.

[42] Berger, D.L., 2011. Did Buddhism ever go east? The Westernization of Buddhism in Chad Hansen's Daoist historiography. Philosophy East and West. 61(1), 38–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2011.0003

[43] Moody, P., 2016. Word and Tao: Thoughts on an attempt at conceptual translation. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture. 19(2), 100–126. Available from: https://www.pdcnet.org/logos/content/logos_2016_0019_0002_0100_0126

[44] Derrida, J., 1981. Plato's pharmacy. In: Derrida, J., ed. Dissemination. Translated by Johnson B. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois, USA. pp. 61–171.

[45] Dickinson, G.L., 1931. Plato and his dialogues. Gregory Allen & Unwin Ltd.: London, UK.

[46] Havelock, E.A., 1963. Preface to Plato. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.

[47] Plato. Phaedrus. 1925. In Plato in twelve volumes, Vol. 9. Translated by Fowler HN. Harvard University Press: London, UK. Available from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/searchresults?q=plato&target=en&collections=Perseus%3Acollection%3AGreco-Roman

[48] Plato. Letter 7. 1966. In: Plato in twelve volumes, Vol. 7. Translated by Bury RG. William Heinemann Ltd.: London, UK. Available from: https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0164%3Aletter%3D7%3Asection%3D344c

[49] Gadamer, H.G., 2004. Truth and method, 2nd Revised ed. Translated by Weinsheimer, J., Marshall, D.G. Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK.

[50] Derrida, J., 1978. Writing and difference. Translated by Bass A. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London, England.

[51] Jasper, N., 1988. Plato, Derrida, and writing. Southern Illinois University: IL, USA.

[52] Olson C., 2020. Playing in the non-representational mode of thinking: A comparison of Derrida, Dōgen, and Zhuangzi. Comparative and Continental Philosophy. 12(1), 30–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2020.1709684

[53] Wang, Y., 2004. The strategies of “goblet words": Indirect communication in the Zhuangzi. Journal of Chinese Philosophy. 31(2), 195–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2004.00150.x

[54] Chiu, W.W., 2015. Goblet words and indeterminacy: A writing style that is free of commitment. Frontiers of Philosophy in China. 10(2), 255–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3868/S030-004-015-0019-3

[55] Wilson, P.L. Aimless Wandering – Chuang Tzu's Chaos Linguistics. Available from: https://www.thing.de/projekte/7:9%23/chuang_tzu_linguistics.html#text2 (cited 16 March 2024).

[56] Wu, K.M., 1990. The butterfly as companion: Meditations on the first three chapters of the Chuang-Tzu. New York Press: Albany, NY, USA.

Downloads

How to Cite

Shpeizer, R. (2025). Zhuangzi and Plato: Language and the World, the World of Language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8761

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 4 (April 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Raz Shpeizer

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.