“Do EFL Learners Need AI?”: Exploring Learners’ Perspectives on the Use of ChatGPT for Morphology and Syntax Learning Tasks

Authors

  • Ratna Dewanti

    Department of English Language Education, State University of Jakarta, Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia
  • Ifan Iskandar

    Department of English Language Education, State University of Jakarta, Jakarta, 13220, Indonesia
  • Yordan Yasin

    Faculty of Computer Science, University of Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8762
Received: 16 February 2025 | Revised: 17 March 2025 | Accepted: 25 March 2025 | Published Online: 28 March 2025

Abstract

This study investigates English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ perspectives on using ChatGPT for English morphology and syntax learning tasks. Data were collected from 24 EFL learners enrolled in an English Morphology and Syntax course at a university in Jakarta, Indonesia, through weekly progress reports and a focus group discussion. The findings reveal that learners utilize ChatGPT for various purposes, including simplifying, confirming, elaborating, previewing, and supplementing course materials. While learners generally hold positive perceptions of ChatGPT, concerns regarding its accuracy and its limitations in morphological and morphemic analysis were noted. The study indicates that while ChatGPT can assist with basic explanations and concepts, it struggles with complex linguistic analysis, making it a supplementary tool rather than a substitute for textbooks or instructors. Learners expressed the need for improved citation references and multimodal support in ChatGPT, as well as more reliable information. These findings provide empirical evidence of ChatGPT’s role in EFL linguistic learning, showing its potential to enhance learning experiences while emphasizing its limitations. The study suggests that ChatGPT, when used appropriately, can support EFL learners in understanding linguistic concepts but cannot replace the traditional classroom learning environment. The study also offers insights for future pedagogical strategies to effectively integrate Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools into linguistics education.

Keywords:

EFL; AI; ChatGPT; Morphology; Syntax

References

[1] Shaikh, S., Yayilgan, S.Y., Klimova, B., 2023. Assessing the usability of ChatGPT for formal English language learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health. Psychology and Education. 13(9), 1937–1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13090140.

[2] Hughes, R., 2002. Teaching and Researching Speaking Rebecca Hughes. Applied Linguistics in Action Series [edited by CN Candlin, DR Hall].Pearson Education: Hong Kong, China.

[3] Hwang, W.Y., Nurtantyana, R., Purba, S.W.D., et al., 2023. AI and recognition technologies to facilitate English as foreign language writing for supporting personalization and contextualization in authentic contexts. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 61(5), 1008–1035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221137253.

[4] Wulandari, B.A., Piscioneri, M., Ikram, W., 2021. Examining Students' Challenges in Oracy in Academic Context Classes. International Journal of Language Education. 5(1), 598–615.

[5] Wu, S., Liu, D., Li, Z., 2023. Testing the Bottleneck Hypothesis: Chinese EFL learners' knowledge of morphology and syntax across proficiency levels. Second Language Research. 39(4), 1191–1217.

[6] Zaretsky, E., Russak, S., 2024. Using oral narratives to examine acquisition of English verb morphology among multilingual Arabic and monolingual Hebrew speakers: finding similarities with monolingual English-speaking SLIs. International Journal of Multilingualism. 21(4), 2217–2238.

[7] Iamsirirak, E., Phoocharoensil, S., 2023. The Recognition of English Tenses by Thai EFL Learners. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 23(19), 7–18.

[8] Dai, K., Liu, Q., 2024. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in English as a foreign language (EFL) class: Challenges and opportunities in the spotlight. Computers in Human Behavior. 159(2024), 108354 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108354.

[9] Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., et al., 2024. The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators' perspectives[J]. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 6, 100221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100221.

[10] Al Shloul, T., Mazhar, T., Iqbal, M., 2024. Role of activity-based learning and ChatGPT on students' performance in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 6, 100219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100219.

[11] Halaweh, M., 2023. ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology. 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036.

[12] Xiao, Y., Zhi, Y., 2023. An exploratory study of EFL learners' use of ChatGPT for language learning tasks: Experience and perceptions. Languages. 8(3), 212.

[13] Van Horn, K.R., 2024. ChatGPT in English Language Learning: Exploring Perceptions and Promoting Autonomy in a University EFL Context. TESL-EJ. 28(1), n1.

[14] Ma, Q., Crosthwaite, P., Sun, D., 2024. Exploring ChatGPT literacy in language education: A global perspective and comprehensive approach. Computers and education: Artificial intelligence. 7, 100278.

[15] Aljohani W. ChatGPT for EFL: Usage and Perceptions among BA and MA Students. Open J Mod Linguist [Internet] 2024;14(06):1119–39. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?doi=10.4236/ojml.2024.146059

[16] Payne, T., 2006. Exploring Language Structure: A Student's Guide. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[17] Borer, H., 2017. Morphology and syntax. The handbook of morphology. Wiley-blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 149–190.

[18] Lyons, J., 1981. Language and linguistics. Cambridge university press: Cambridge, UK.

[19] Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z., 2020. Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Review. IEEE Access. 8, 75264–75278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510.

[20] Dwivedi, Y.K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., et al., 2021. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management. 57, 101994

[21] Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., et al., 2023. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences. 103, 102274.

[22] Achiam J, Adler S, Agarwal S, et al., 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (cited 18 December 2024)

[23] Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M.A., et al., 2023. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart learning environments. 10(1), 15.

[24] Steele, J.L., 2023. To GPT or not GPT? Empowering our students to learn with AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 5, 100160.

[25] Kajiwara, Y., Kawabata, K., 2024. AI literacy for ethical use of chatbot: Will students accept AI ethics?. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 6, 100251.

[26] Weise, K., Metz, C., 2023. When AI chatbots hallucinate. The New York Times. 9, 610–623.

[27] Qamar, M.T., Yasmeen, J., Pathak, S.K., 2024. Big claims, low outcomes: fact checking ChatGPT's efficacy in handling linguistic creativity and ambiguity. Cogent arts & humanities. 11(1), 2353984.

[28] Creswell, J., 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Pearson: London, UK.

[29] Bauman, A., 2015. Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Qualitative research in organizations and management: An international journal. 10(2), 201–202.

[30] McBride–Chang, C., Wagner, R.K., Muse, A., et al., 2005. The role of morphological awareness in children's vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied psycholinguistics. 26(3), 415–435.

[31] Yan, D., 2023. Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies. 28(11), 13943–13967.

[32] Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., Malmström, H., 2024. Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 7, 100259.

[33] Qin, W., Uccelli, P., 2020. Beyond linguistic complexity: Assessing register flexibility in EFL writing across contexts. Assessing Writing. 45, 100465.

[34] Song, Y., Weisberg, L.R., Zhang, S., et al., 2024. A framework for inclusive AI learning design for diverse learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 6, 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100212.

[35] Ouyang, Z., Jiang, Y., Liu, H., 2024. The effects of Duolingo, an AI-integrated technology, on EFL learners' willingness to communicate and engagement in online classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 25(3), 97–115.

[36] Huang, H.W., Li, Z., Taylor, L.2020. The Effectiveness of Using Grammarly to Improve Students' Writing Skills. in: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 22–25, May 2020. Beijing, China. pp. 122–127.

[37] Xu, W., Ouyang, F., 2022. A systematic review of AI role in the educational system based on a proposed conceptual framework. Education and Information Technologies. 27(3), 4195–4223.

Downloads

How to Cite

Dewanti, R., Iskandar, I., & Yasin, Y. (2025). “Do EFL Learners Need AI?”: Exploring Learners’ Perspectives on the Use of ChatGPT for Morphology and Syntax Learning Tasks. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8762

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 4 (April 2025): In Progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Ratna Dewanti, Ifan Iskandar, Yordan Yasin

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.