Examining Interface of Al-Azhari’s Grammatical Reasoning: Quranic Readings as a Model

Authors

  • Lina Al-Jarraḥ

    Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan

  • Tariq Mohammed Farghal

    Department of English Language and Translation, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan

  • Murad Ismail Al-Whiedy

    Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan

  • Dania Hashem Alwidyan

    Department of Basic Sciences and Humanities, Amman Arab University, Amman 11953, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8817
Received: 21 February 2025 | Revised: 20 March 2025 | Accepted: 21 March 2025 | Published Online: 10 April 2025

Abstract

This paper examines a well-known Arabic phonological phenomenon called grammatical reasoning. The study addresses four forms of reasoning in the Arabic Case system: alleviating, heaviness, meaning-carrying, and adjacency. The study categorizes the data linguistically and phonologically adopting a descriptive qualitative methodology by presenting a sample of Quranic verses carrying the target reasoning forms. The study findings reveal that Arabic via syntacticphonological interface utilizes different strategies of phonological reductions that result in alternative phonological readings of some Quranic lexicon. The study contributes to understanding Arabic phonological reductive processes by reflecting on the multiplicity of phonological readings of the Quranic language. The study has shown that this phonological reduction includes phonological elision, vowel alterations, consonantal shortening, as well as assimilation processes. By assessing the distinction of the application of these process in Al-Azhari’s grammatical categorization, the study distinguishes between four phenomena explicated in Arabic classical grammar, but underexplored in modern linguistics and phonology (alleviating, adjacency, heaviness, and semantic concord). Therefore, the study contributes on the one hand to casting novel modern linguistic analysis on classical interpretations of different phonological readings, while on the other hand the study sheds light on the interplay between phonological processes and Quranic readings, emphasizing the micro coordination between syntax and phonology while showing relevance to the macro interpretational levels of Quranic studies.

Keywords:

Grammatical Reasoning; Alleviating; Heaviness; Adjacency; Qualitative; Quranic

References

[1] Al-Azhari, A.M., 1991. The Recitations and Grammatical Reasons: What is Called "Reasons of the Recitations". Research Center at the Faculty of Arts, King Saud University: Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. pp. 1-738.

[2] Al-Ani, D.A.F., 2020. The Syntactic Terminology in the Book of Meanings of Readings by Al-Azhari (d. 370 AH). Journal of Education and Scientific Studies. 3(16), 143–164.

[3] Al-Osaily, E.F., Haza’Alzu’bi, M., Shalan, S.K., et al., 2024. The Authority of Arabs’ Speech in the Works of Early Grammarians. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences. 51(1), 430–438. (in Arabic)

[4] Aldubai, N.A., 2015. Phonological Features in the Qur’anic Seven Modes of Reading (Qira’āt). English Linguistics Research. 4(4), 29–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v4n4p29

[5] Al-Nuaemy, A.A., Younis, R., 2008. The Grammatical Interpretation upon Al-Azhari, in his book (Meaning of Readings). Adab Al-Rafidayn. 38(51), 353–382.

[6] Alenazy, M.A., Almahameed, Y.S., Tawalbeh, A.I., et al., 2024. Arabic Profession-Denoting Nouns and Gender: A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Agreement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 14(12), 3733–3743.

[7] Al-khawadah, M., 2021. What is true in the Qur’anic readings and is not true in the Arabic rules" A grammatical explanatory study" The meanings of the readings of Al-Azhari" model". Jordan Journal of Islamic Studies. 17(3), 9–36.

[8] Mohamed, Y., Hoque, M., Ismail, T.H.S.B., et al., 2021. Relationship between phonology, phonetics, and Tajweed: A literature review. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020); October 13–October 14, 2020; Bantul, Indonesia. pp. 407–411.

[9] Wilder, C., Gärtner, H.M., Bierwisch, M., 2018. The role of economy principles in linguistic theory. De Gruyter Akademie Forschung: Berlin, Germany. 1-298.

[10] Alammar, A., 2021. Non-metrical vowel optimization and iambic unevenness in Arabic. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies. 18(1), 262–284.

[11] Gilliot, C., 2020. The Beginnings of Qur'ānic Exegesis. In: The Qur’an. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–28.

[12] Ab Hadi, A.A.H., Lubis, F.A., 2023. Contributions of al-Khalil bin Ahmad al-Farahidi Toward The Development of Arabic Linguistics. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences. 6(4), 52–63.

[13] Al-Qāḍī, W., 2011. Al-Zajjāj and Glassmaking An Expanded Range of Options in a Comparative Context. In: In the Shadow of Arabic: The Centrality of Language to Arabic Culture. Brill: Leiden, the Netherlands. pp. 221–248.

[14] Al Solami, M., 2020. Vowel elision, epenthesis and metrical systems in Bedouin Arabic dialects [PhD Thesis]. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto. pp. 1-276

[15] Pierrehumbert, J., 1992. Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Northeastern Linguistic Society, Graduate Student Association, U. Mass. Amherst. 367-381.

[16] Özkanlı, Z., 2023. Vowels and classification criteria in modern standard Arabic. İhya Uluslararası İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi. 9(1), 1–19.

[17] Al-Jarrah, L.A., Alqudah, M.H., 2021. Vocal Harmony in Zaid Bin Ali Reading. Arab Journal of Sciences & Research Publishing. 7(2), 26–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1234/ajsrp.v7i2.5

[18] Supardi, S., Jabal, A.K.M.H., 2023. Contrastive Analysis of Concord in Arabic, English, and Indonesian. Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab. 15(2), 356–379.

[19] Al-Warraq, A.H.M., 2002. What Has Not Named Its Agent. In: Nasarah, M.M. (eds.). Grammatical Reasons. Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah: Beirut, Lebanon. p. 86.

[20] Ibn Jinni, A.F.U., 1954. Chapter on When One Thing Neighbor Another, Much of Its Rulings Apply. In: Mustafa, I., Amin, A. (eds.). The Equitable Book on Morphology. Ministry of Public Education: Cairo, Egypt. p. 2.

[21] Al-Suyuti, J.D., 2006. Chapter on Analogy. In: Hasan, M. (eds.). Suggestions in the Science of Syntax Principles. Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah: Beirut, Lebanon. pp. 71–73.

[22] Almahameed, Y.S., Farghal, T.M., 2024. To Hedge or Not to Hedge: A Pragmatic Study of Hedging in Jordanian Arabic. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies. 25(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v25i1.648

[23] Farghal, T.M., 2020. Hyperraising in Jordanian Arabic [Master Thesis]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. pp. 1–103.

[24] Ibn Jinni, A.F.U., 2001. Section on Semantic Concord. In: Hindawi, A.H. (eds.). The Characteristics. Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah: Beirut, Lebanon. p. 180.

[25] Abu-Elrob, R.A., Farghal, T.M., Tawalbeh, A.I., 2025. A Pragmo-Semantic Analysis of Colloquial Referring Expressions: A Study in Jordanian Arabic. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(1), 975–994.

[26] Baier, N.B., 2018. Anti-agreement. Available from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/49t9t8h5 (cited 7 January 2018).

[27] Ouhalla, J., 2005. Agreement features, agreement and antiagreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory. 23(3), 655–686.

[28] Alali, H., 2023. Developmental trajectory of grammatical gender: evidence from Arabic [PhD Thesis]. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. pp. 1-293.

[29] Maghrabi, R.O., 2020. Variation and Variables in Some Arabic Varieties. Journal of Arts and Humanities. 9(1), 39–63.

Downloads

How to Cite

Al-Jarraḥ, L., Farghal, T. M., Al-Whiedy, M. I., & Alwidyan, D. H. (2025). Examining Interface of Al-Azhari’s Grammatical Reasoning: Quranic Readings as a Model. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8817