Lien-Huong Vo
Faculty of English, Hue University, Hue City 530000, Vietnam
Long Viet Le
Faculty of English, Hue University, Hue City 530000, Vietnam
Authorial voice, one of those constructs that shapes how writers establish their stance with scholarly discourse, lies within the centrality of academic writing. While extensively studied in Applied Linguistics, authorial voice has been primarily explored through stance markers, personal pronouns, and engagement strategies, with relatively little attention given to its construction through the Graduation system of the Appraisal framework within Systemic Functional Linguistics. This study, therefore, examines how Vietnamese EFL writers employ Graduation resources to construct their authorial voice in the discussion sections of TESOL theses to bridge the gap. Using the Appraisal framework, a corpus of 15 theses was compiled and analyzed to identify patterns of Graduation use and their impact on voice projection. The findings uncover the predominance of Force-based Graduation, particularly the linguistic resources of Intensification and Quantification, over Focus-based Graduation. This suggests that EFL writers tend to strengthen or weaken meanings rather than redefine categorical boundaries. The study also identifies three levels of authorial voice by Vietnamese EFL writers, namely, explicit, implicit, and unclear, depending on how Graduation resources are employed. While these strategies enhance persuasion, they may also limit critical engagement with existing research. Given the insights, explicit instruction on voice-related linguistic features is necessitated.
[1] Elbow, P., 1994. What do we mean when we talk about voice in texts. In Voices on Voice: Perspectives, Definitions, Inquiry. Natl Council of Teachers of English: Urbana, IL, USA. pp. 1–35.
[2] Matsuda, P.K., Tardy, C.M., 2007. Voice in academic writing: The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review. English for Specific Purposes. 26(2), 235–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
[3] Hunston, S., Thompson, G., 2000. Evaluation: An introduction. In: Hunston, S., Thompson, G. (eds.). Evaluation in text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 1–27.
[4] Hyland, K., 2008. Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies. 8(2), 1–23.
[5] Martin, J.R., White, P.R.R., 2005. The language of evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–278.
[6] Goudong, G.U., Afzaal, M., 2023. Understanding Political Debates from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A Corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis. BRU ELT Journal. 1(1), 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14456/bej.2023.7
[7] Huan, C., 2016. Journalistic engagement patterns and power relations: Corpus evidence from Chinese and Australian hard news reporting. Discourse & Communication. 10(2), 137–156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315611239
[8] Jing, S., Lihuan, J., 2021. Attitude analysis of news discourse from the perspective of appraisal theory: A case study of China Daily’s report on COVID-19. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 6(6), 175–182.
[9] Alotaibi, H., 2019. An Exploration of Authorial Stance in SSCI-ranked Journals versus Non-SSCI-ranked Journals. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 25(3), 65–78. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-05
[10] Chang, P., Schleppegrell, M., 2011. Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 10, 140–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.005
[11] Loi, C.-K., Lim, J.M.-H., Wharton, S., 2016. Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 21, 1–16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004
[12] Naghizadeh, M., Afzali, K., 2018. Author Engagement in the Literature Review of Research Articles Published in International and Iranian Local Journals: Some Insights from Appraisal Theory. Applied Research on English Language. 7(1), 111–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2019.113133.1369
[13] Xie, J., 2016. Direct or indirect? Critical or uncritical? Evaluation in Chinese English-major MA thesis literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 23, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.05.001
[14] Geng, Y., Wharton, S., 2016. Evaluative Language in Discussion Sections of Doctoral Theses: Similarities and Differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 22, 80–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001
[15] Loghmani, Z., Ghonsooly, B., Ghazanfari, M., 2020. Engagement in Doctoral Dissertation Discussion Sections Writtenby English Native Speakers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 45, 100851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100851
[16] Zhao, J., Liu, Y., 2021. A Developmental View of Authorial Voice Construction in Master’s Thesis: A Case Study of Two Novice L2 Writers. SAGE Open. 11(4), 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054483
[17] Guinda, C.S., Hyland, K., 2012. Introduction: A context-sensitive approach to stance and voice. In: Hyland, K., Guinda, C.S. (Eds.). Stance and voice in written academic genres. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–11.
[18] Matsuda, P.K., 2015. Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 35, 140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000178
[19] Stock, I., Eik-Nes, N.L., 2016. Voice features in academic texts–A review of empirical studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 24, 89–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.006
[20] Mhilli, O., 2023. Authorial voice in writing: A literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 8, 100550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100550
[21] Zhao, C.G., 2019. Writer background and voice construction in L2 writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 37, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.004
[22] Nelson, N., Castelló, M., 2012. Academic writing and authorial voice. University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies. Brill: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 33–51.
[23] Cheung, Y.L., Lau, L., 2020. Authorial voice in academic writing: A comparative study of journal articles in English Literature and Computer Science. Ibérica. (39), 215–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.39.215
[24] Hyland, K., 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes. 20, 207–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
[25] McCarthy, W., 2015. A matter of style. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 40(2), 95–100.
[26] Wu, G., Zhu, Y., 2014. Self-mention and authorial identity construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Linguistics and the Human Sciences. 10(2), 133–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/lhs.v10i2.28557
[27] Harwood, N., 2005. ‘We do not seem to have a theory…The theory I present here attempts to fill this gap’: Inclusive and exclusive pronouns in academic writing. Applied Linguistics. 26(3), 343–375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
[28] Zhao, C.G., 2012. Measuring authorial voice strength in L2 argumentative writing: The development and validation of an analytic rubric. Language Testing. 30(2), 201–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212456965
[29] Helms-Park, R., Stapleton, P., 2003. Questioning the importance of individualized voice in undergraduate L2 argumentative writing: An empirical study with pedagogical implications. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12(3), 245–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.001
[30] Stapleton, P., 2002. Critiquing voice as a viable pedagogical tool in L2 writing: Returning spotlight to ideas. Journal of Second Language Writing. 11(3), 177–190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00070-X
[31] Zabihi, R., Mehrani-Rad, M., Khodi, A., 2019. Assessment of Authorial Voice Strength in L2 Argumentative Written Task Performances: Contributions of Voice Components to Text Quality. Journal of Writing Research. 11(2), 331–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.04
[32] Canagarajah, S., 2015. Blessed in my own way: Pedagogical affordances for dialogical voice construction in multilingual student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 27, 122–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.001
[33] Cappello, M., 2006. Under construction: Voice and identity development in writing workshop. Language Arts. 83(6), 482–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/la20064909
[34] Hyland, K., 2002. Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics. 23(2), 215–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215
[35] Tang, R., 2009. A dialogic account of authority in academic writing. Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse. Continuum: Dallas, TX, USA. pp. 170–190.
[36] Hanks, E., Eckstein, G., Rawlins, J., et al., 2024. Authorial Voice in Academic Articles: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Citation Types and Citation Presentation across Disciplines. Journal of Academic Writing. 14(2), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v14i2.1041
[37] Zhang, W., Cheung, Y.L., 2018. The construction of authorial voice in writing research articles: A corpus-based study from an APPRAISAL theory perspective. International Journal of English Studies. 18(2), 53–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/320261
[38] Aull, L.L., Lancaster, Z., 2014. Linguistic makers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication. 31(2), 151–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055
[39] Hyland, K., Milton, J., 1997. Hedging in L1 and L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 6(2), 183–296.
[40] Jiang, F.K., 2015. Nominal stance construction in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 20, 90–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.07.002
[41] Tang, R., John, S., 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes. 18, S23–S39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00009-5
[42] Wu, S.Y., Rubin, D.L., 2000. Evaluating the impact of collectivism and individualism on argumentative writing by Chinese and North American college students. Research in the Teaching of English. 35(2), 148–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte20001715
[43] Zhao, C.G., 2016. Voice in timed L2 argumentative essay writing. Assessing Writing. 31, 73–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.004
[44] Bakstash, N., Kaivanpanah, S., Alavi, S.M., 2024. Promoting Authorial Voice Expression in Academic Writing of EFL Learners through Implicit and Explicit Instruction. Applied Research on English Language. 13(4), 49–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22108/are.2024.141502.2294
[45] Hyland, K., 2005. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 7(2), 173–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
[46] Kim, H., Sefcik, J.S., Bradway, C., 2017. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Research in Nursing & Health. 40(1), 23–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768
[47] Fryer, D.L., 2013. Exploring the dialogism of academic discourse: Heteroglossic Engagement in medical research articles. English Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre. 77, 183–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209403_011
[48] Ngo, T.T.B., 2013. The Deployment of the Language of Evaluation in English and Vietnamese Spoken Discourse [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Sydney: Sydney, NSW, Australia. pp. 1–406.
[49] Tardy, C.M., 2012. Voice construction, assessment, and extra-textual identity. Research in the Teaching of English. 47(1), 64–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201220672
[50] Jou, Y., 2019. Scaffolding L2 writers’ metacognitive awareness of voice in article reviews: A case study of SFL-based pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 41, 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100770
Copyright © 2025 Lien-Huong Vo, Long Viet Le
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
