Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Resources and L2 Academic Writing Attainment: Insights from Arabic-Speaking L2 Learners

Authors

  • Mona Alsheheri

    Educational Sciences Department, Taif University, Taif 11099, Saudi Arabia
  • Sami Alsalmi

    Department of English, King Saud University, Riyadh 11652, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8881
Received: 26 February 2025 | Revised: 28 March 2025 | Accepted: 31 March 2025 | Published Online: 15 April 2025

Abstract

Typical research in the field of English as a Foreign Language has increasingly examined the influence of cognitive factors, particularly working memory capacity (WMC) and phonological short-term memory (PSTM), on second language learning. However, empirical investigations into the effects of WMC and PSTM on second language writing, particularly in real-world contexts involving Arabic-speaking learners, remain underexplored. Hence, the study sample comprised 50 Saudi undergraduate students enrolled in an English language program aimed at developing language and translation skills. WMC and PSTM were assessed using visually presented digit span tasks: a backward-digit span for WMC and a forward-digit span for PSTM. Writing performance was operationalized based on participants’ total grades in a writing course. The findings indicated that backward-digit span performance is significantly greater than forward-digit span performance. However, neither WMC nor PSTM significantly predicted academic success in the writing course. By highlighting the complex relationship between cognitive processes and writing outcomes, this study contributes to a broader understanding of English as a Foreign Language writing, particularly its relevance to WMC and PSTM, offering valuable insights for future research. Furthermore, the study addresses methodological limitations, emphasizing the need for future research to consider these shortcomings in order to enhance the robustness of subsequent investigations.

Keywords:

Working Memory Capacity (WMC); Phonological Short-Term Memory (PSTM); EFL Writing; Arabic-Speaking Learners of English

References

[1] Li, S., Roshan, S., 2019. The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing. 45, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.003

[2] Li, S., 2023. Working memory and second language learning: A critical and synthetic review. In: Godfroid, A., Hopp, H. (eds.). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 348–360.

[3] Baddeley, A., 2015. Working memory in second language learning. In: Wen, Z., Mota, M., McNeil, A. (eds.). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Multilingual Matters: Bristol, UK. pp. 17–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093595-005

[4] Baddeley, A., 2017. Modularity, working memory and language acquisition. Second Language Research. 33(3), 299–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317709852

[5] Kim, M., Tian, Y., Crossley, S.A., 2021. Exploring the relationships among cognitive and linguistic resources, writing processes, and written products in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 53, 100824. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100824

[6] Gathercole, S.E., Baddeley, A.D., 1993. Phonological working memory: A critical building block for reading development and vocabulary acquisition? European Journal of Psychology of Education. 8, 259–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174081

[7] Papagno, 2022. The Phonological Loop as a “Language Learning Device”: An Update. In J. W. Schwieter & Z. (Edward) Wen (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 51–72.

[8] Li, S., 2023. Working memory and second language writing: A systematic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 45(3), 647–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000189

[9] Mujtaba, S.M., Kamyabi Gol, A., Parkash, R., 2021. A study on the relationship between language aptitude, vocabulary size, working memory, and L2 writing accuracy. Foreign Language Annals. 54(4), 1059–1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12584

[10] Vasylets, O., Marín, J., 2021. The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 52, 100786. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100786

[11] Manchón, R.M., McBride, S., Mellado Martínez, M.D., et al., 2023. Working memory, L2 proficiency, and task complexity: Independent and interactive effects on L2 written performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 45(3), 737–764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000141

[12] Hayes, J.R., 1996. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In: Levy, C.M., Randall, S. (eds.). The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA. pp. 1–27.

[13] Kellogg, R.T., 1996. A model of working memory in writing. In: Levy, C.M., Ransdell, S. (eds.). The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA. pp. 57–71.

[14] Kellogg, R.T., Whiteford, A.P., Turner, C.E., et al., 2013. Working memory in written composition: An evaluation of the 1996 model. Journal of writing research. 5(2), 159–190.‏

[15] Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., et al., 2019. The role of working memory in young second language learners' written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing. 45, 31–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.002

[16] Peng, A., Orosco, M.J., Wang, H., et al., 2022. Cognition and writing development in early adolescent English learners. Journal of Educational Psychology. 114(5), 1136–1155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000695

[17] Li, S., 2017. Cognitive differences and ISLA. In: Loewen, S., Sato, M. (eds.). Handbook of instructed second language learning. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 396–417.

[18] Wen, Z., Li, S., 2019. Working memory in L2 learning and processing. In: Schwieter, J.W., Benati, A. (eds.). The Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 365–389.

[19] Sagarra, N., 2017. Longitudinal effects of working memory on L2 grammar and reading abilities. Second Language Research. 33(3), 341–363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317690577

[20] Granena, G., 2023. Cognitive individual differences in the process and product of L2 writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 45(3), 765–785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263123000347

[21] Kormos, J., Sáfár, A., 2008. Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 11(2), 261–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003416

[22] Martin, K.I., Ellis, N.C., 2012. The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in second language acquisition. 34(3), 379–413.

[23] Kaushanskaya, M., Yoo, J., 2013. Phonological short-term and working memory in bilinguals' native and second language. Applied Psycholinguistics. 34(5), 1005–1037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000100

[24] Kondo, A., 2021. Phonological short-term memory's contribution to the L2 reading proficiency of Japanese EFL learners. JALT Journal. 43(2), 167.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ43.2-2

[25] Oshima, A., 2014. Longman academic writing series 3: Paragraphs to essays (4th ed.). Pearson Education: London, UK.

[26] Gathercole, S.E., 1999. Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in cognitive sciences. 3(11), 410–419.‏

[27] Elliot, C.D., Smith, P., McCulloch, K., 1997. British abilities scale 11: Technical manual. NFER-Nelson: Windsor, UK.

[28] Gathercole, S.E., Pickering, S.J., Knight, C., et al., 2004. Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 18(1), 1–16.‏ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.934

[29] Shah, P., Miyake, A., 1996. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 125(1), 4–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4

[30] White, M.J., 2021. Phonological working memory and non-verbal complex working memory as predictors of future English outcomes in young ELLs. International Journal of Bilingualism. 25(1), 318–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920948136

Downloads

How to Cite

Alsheheri, M., & Alsalmi, S. (2025). Exploring the Relationship between Cognitive Resources and L2 Academic Writing Attainment: Insights from Arabic-Speaking L2 Learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 851–861. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8881

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 4 (April 2025)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Mona Alsheheri, Sami Alsalmi

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.