Mohammad Rashid Alfuhaid
Department of English Language and Literature, College of Languages and Humanities, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
Regular access and exposure to authentic written material is essential for learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) or second language (ESL) beyond the intermediate level, thus necessitating the determination of the vocabulary size required for comprehension of such material. Most research into the effect of text coverage on comprehension has used small corpora, primarily comprising simplified texts. This study demonstrates the word-family sizes necessary for the adequate and optimal comprehension of an accessible genre of authentic text-based material: online political news reports. For this purpose, a corpus of 20 million words was collected from the online New York Times newspaper over a 24-month period. Lexical profiling of the corpus was conducted via Nation’s British National Corpus/Corpus of Contemporary American English (BNC/COCA) 25 word-family lists using the AntWordProfiler software. The monthly corpora reflected relatively consistent text coverage of each of the first 3,000 word-family bands and of the vocabulary sizes necessary to reach the coverage levels widely accepted as prerequisites to achieving adequate (95%) and optimal (98%) comprehension. Results of the whole-corpus analysis indicated that the 95% and 98% text coverage levels were achieved, respectively, within the 3,000–4,000 and 6,000–7,000 word-family bands. These findings render written political news reports in general, and from the New York Times in particular, a useful source of supplementary material for EFL/ESL learners to improve the breadth and depth of their English vocabulary knowledge once they master approximately 3,500 word families.
[1] Laufer, B., 2013. Lexical thresholds for reading comprehension: What they are and how they can be used for teaching purposes. TESOL Quarterly. 47(4), 867–872. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.140
[2] Laufer, B., Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G.C., 2010. Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners' vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language. 22(2), 15–30.
[3] Nation, I.S.P., 2013. Learning vocabulary in another language, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[4] Choi, Y., Zhang, D., 2021. The relative role of vocabulary and grammatical knowledge in L2 reading comprehension: A systematic review of literature. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 59(1), 1–30.
[5] Dagnaw, A.T., 2023. Revisiting the role of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Cogent Education. 10(1), 2217345.
[6] Dong, Y., Tang, Y., Chow, B.W.Y., et al., 2020. Contribution of vocabulary knowledge to reading comprehension among Chinese students: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 11, 525369.
[7] Ha, H.T., 2021. Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Language Testing in Asia. 11(1), 20.
[8] Laufer, B., 1992. How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In: Arnaud, P.J.L., Béjoint, H. (eds.). Vocabulary and applied linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 126–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
[9] Li, H., Gan, Z., 2022. Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students' English reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 1041870.
[10] Nation, I.S.P., 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
[11] Nation, I.S.P., 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review. 63(1), 59–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
[12] Qian, D.D., 1999. Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review. 56(2), 282–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282
[13] Qian, D.D., 2002. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning. 52(3), 513–536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
[14] Spencer, M., Quinn, J.M., Wagner, R.K., 2017. Vocabulary, morphology, and reading comprehension. In: Cain, K., Compton, D., Parrila, R. (eds.). Theories of reading development. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 239–256.
[15] Nation, I.S.P., 2008. Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Heinle Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA.
[16] Klinmanee, N., Sopprasong, L., 1997. Bridging the EFL vocabulary gap between secondary school and university: A Thai case study. Guidelines. 19(1), 1–10.
[17] Kyongho, H., Nation, P., 1989. Reducing the vocabulary load and encouraging vocabulary learning through reading newspapers. Reading in a Foreign Language. 6, 323–335.
[18] Schmitt, N., Carter, R., 2000. The lexical advantages of narrow reading for second language learners. TESOL Journal. 9(1), 4–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2000.tb00220.x
[19] Sternfeld, S., 1989. The University of Utah's immersion/multiliteracy program: An example of an area studies approach to the design of first-year college foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals. 22(4), 341–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02757.x
[20] Day, R., Bamford, J., 1998. Extensive reading in the second classroom. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[21] Schmitt, N., 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
[22] Cho, K.S., Ahn, K.O., Krashen, S., 2005. The effects of narrow reading of authentic texts on interest and reading ability in English as a foreign language. Reading Improvement. 42(1), 58–65.
[23] Kang, E.Y., 2015. Promoting L2 vocabulary learning through narrow reading. RELC Journal. 46(2), 165–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215586236
[24] Krashen, S.D., 2004. The power of reading: Insights from the research, 2nd ed. Libraries Unlimited: Westport, CT, USA.
[25] Rodgers, M.P., Webb, S., 2011. Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly. 45(4), 689–717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.268062
[26] Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., Grabe, W., 2011. The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal. 95(1), 26–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
[27] Laufer, B., 2020. Lexical coverages, inferencing unknown words and reading comprehension: How are they related? TESOL Quarterly. 54(4), 1076–1085. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3004
[28] Nurmukhamedov, U., Webb, S., 2019. Lexical coverage and profiling. Language Teaching. 52(2), 188–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000028
[29] Webb, S., Nation, I.S.P., 2013. Computer-assisted vocabulary load analysis. In: Chappelle, C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK. pp. 844–853.
[30] Bonk, W.J., 2000. Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening. 14(1), 14–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
[31] Hu, M., Nation, I.S.P., 2000. Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language. 13(1), 403–430.
[32] Laufer, B., 1989. What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In: Laurén, C., Nordman, M. (eds.). Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines. Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, UK. pp. 316–323.
[33] Laufer, B., Sim, D.D., 1985. Measuring and explaining the reading threshold needed for English for academic purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals. 18(5), 405–411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb00973.x
[34] Stæhr, L.S., 2009. Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 31(4), 577–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990039
[35] van Zeeland, H., Schmitt, N., 2013. Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics. 34(4), 457–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams074
[36] Webb, S., 2021. Research investigating lexical coverage and lexical profiling: What we know, what we don't know, and what needs to be examined. Reading in a Foreign Language. 33(2), 278–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10125/67407
[37] Nation, I.S.P., 2017. The BNC/COCA Level 6 word family lists (Version 1.0.0). Available from: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation.aspx (cited 15 May 2021).
[38] Anthony, L., 2014. AntWordProfiler (Version 1.4.1) [software]. Available from: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software/antwordprofiler/ (cited 15 May 2021).
[39] Heatley, A., Nation, P., Coxhead, A., 2002. RANGE (Version 1.0) [software]. Victoria University of Wellington: Wellington, New Zealand. Available from: https://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/research/projects/Range (cited 15 May 2021)..
[40] Cobb, T., 2021. VocabProfile [software]. Available from: https://www.lextutor.ca/vp/ (cited 15 May 2021).
[41] Chujo, K., 2004. Measuring vocabulary levels of English textbooks and tests using a BNC lemmatised high frequency word list. In: Nakamura, J., Inoue, N., Tabata, T. (eds.). English corpora under Japanese eyes. Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands. pp. 231–249.
[42] Webb, S., Macalister, J., 2013. Is text written for children appropriate for L2 extensive reading? TESOL Quarterly. 47(2), 300–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.70
[43] Collins, J.B., 2017. Applying the lexical coverage hypothesis to establish the suitability of EFL reading materials: A case study of the TOEFL (ITP). APU Journal of Language Research. 3, 29–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34409/apujlr.3.0_29
[44] Rahmat, Y.N., Coxhead, A., 2021. Investigating vocabulary coverage and load in an Indonesian EFL textbook series. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 10(3), 804–814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31768
[45] Yang, L., Coxhead, A., 2022. A corpus-based study of vocabulary in the New Concept English textbook series. RELC Journal. 53(3), 597–611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220964162
[46] Garcia, D.V., 2023. Exploring the vocabulary content of upper secondary EFL textbooks in Sweden: A corpus-based analysis of types, lexical coverage, progression, and academic words [Master's thesis]. Dalarna University: Falun, Sweden. Available from: https://du.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1783297/FULLTEXT01.pdf (cited 11 April 2024).
[47] Chujo, K., Nishigaki, C., 2003. Bridging the vocabulary gap: From EGP to EAP. JACET Bulletin. 37, 73–84.
[48] Kaneko, M., 2020. Lexical frequency profiling of high-stakes English tests: Text coverage of Cambridge First, EIKEN, GTEC, IELTS, TEAP, TOEFL, and TOEIC. JACET Journal. 64, 79–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32234/jacetjournal.64.0_79
[49] Webb, S., Paribakht, T.S., 2015. What is the relationship between the lexical profile of test items and performance on a standardized English proficiency test? English for Specific Purposes. 38, 34–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.11.001
[50] Kanzaki, M., 2017. Lexical coverage of the TOEIC. In: Brooks, G. (ed.). The 2016 PanSIG Journal. JALT: Tokyo, Japan. pp. 126–133.
[51] Nation, I.S.P., 2012. The BNC/COCA word family lists. Available from: http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/paul-nation (cited 15 May 2021).
[52] Hsu, W., 2019. Voice of America news as voluminous reading material for mid-frequency vocabulary learning. RELC Journal. 50(3), 408–421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218764460
[53] Ha, H.T., 2022. Lexical profile of newspapers revisited: A corpus-based analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 800983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.800983
[54] Nation, I.S.P., Webb, S.A., 2011. Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Heinle, Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA.
[55] Hwang, K., Nation, P., 1989. Reducing the vocabulary load and encouraging vocabulary learning through reading newspapers. Reading in a Foreign Language. 6(1), 323–335.
[56] Kaneko, M., 2014. Is the vocabulary level of the reading section of the TOEFL Internet-Based Test beyond the lexical level of Japanese senior high school students? Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. 3(1), 44–50. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7820/vli.v03.1.kaneko
[57] Liu, N., Nation, I.P., 1985. Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal. 16(1), 33–42.
Copyright © 2025 Mohammad Rashid Alfuhaid
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
