Investigating EFL Learners' Use of Pragmatic Marker Combinations

Authors

  • Zhaoyi Pan

    Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9326
Received: 2 April 2025 | Revised: 1 May 2025 | Accepted: 4 May 2025 | Published Online: 10 May 2025

Abstract

This research filled a gap by investigating the use of pragmatic marker (PM) combinations (PMCs) by advanced-level learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) from three Southeast Asian countries, namely Thailand, Indonesia, and Myanmar. The aim was to identify all the PMCs and all the types of the PMCs that the Thai, Indonesian, and Burmese advanced-level EFL learners used. The results revealed that three PMCs were used by all the participants from the three southeast Asian countries, namely the PMCs but when, and when, and uh/um like. Both the Thai and the Indonesian participants used the PMCs and I think and uh/um I think most often, whereas the Burmese participants used the PMCs well I think and like uh/um most frequently. The participants from the three southeast Asian countries used the same PMs as the first PM in the PMCs most often, namely the PMs and, uh/um, and but. In addition, the participants from the three southeast Asian countries used the same four PMs as the second PMs in the PMCs most often, namely the PMs I think, uh/um, like, and when. Both the Thai and the Indonesian participants used the juxtaposition type most often, while the Burmese participants used the composition sub-type in combination most frequently.

Keywords:

Pragmatic Marker Combination; Pragmatic Marker; EFL Learners; Pragmatic Function; English Conversation

References

[1] Buysse, L., 2020. ‘It was a bit stressy as well actually’. The pragmatic markers actually and in fact in spoken learner English. Journal of Pragmatics. 156, 28–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.004

[2] Di Ferrante, L., 2021. Transitioning between small talk and work talk through discourse markers: Evidence from a workplace spoken corpus. Brno Studies in English. 47(2), 7–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2021-2-2

[3] Fung, L., Carter, R., 2007. Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics. 28(3), 410–439.

[4] Xiao, H., Dai, C., Dong, L., 2021. The development of interlanguage pragmatic markers in alignment with role relationships. Pragmatics. 31(4), 617–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20013.xia

[5] Crible, L., Degand, L., 2021. Co-occurrence and ordering of discourse markers in sequences: A multifactorial study in spoken French. Journal of Pragmatics. 177, 18–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.006

[6] Crible, L., Pascual, E., 2020. Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics. 156, 54–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.002

[7] Blanchard, M., Buysse, L., 2021. Like in discourse marker combinations in spoken interaction. Corpus Pragmatics. 5(4), 463–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00105-4

[8] Haselow, A., 2019. Discourse marker sequences: Insights into the serial order of communicative tasks in real-time turn production. Journal of Pragmatics. 146, 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.04.003

[9] Cuenca, M.J., Crible, L., 2019. Co-occurrence of discourse markers in English: From juxtaposition to composition. Journal of Pragmatics. 140, 171–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.001

[10] Huang, L., 2019. A corpus-based exploration of the discourse marker well in spoken interlanguage. Language and Speech. 62(3), 570–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918798863

[11] Öztürk, Y., Köse, G.D., 2021. ‘Well (er) you know…’: Discourse markers in native and non-native spoken English. Corpus Pragmatics. 5(2), 223–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-020-00095-9

[12] Pan, Z., 2024. The use of English pragmatic markers by learners of English from different linguacultural backgrounds. Contrastive Pragmatics. 1(aop), 1–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10120

[13] Brinton, L.J., 2008. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[14] Brinton, L.J., 2017. The evolution of pragmatic markers in English. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[15] Aijmer, K., 2011. Well I’m not sure I think...The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 16(2), 231–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16.2.04aij

[16] Diskin, C., 2017. The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker ‘like’ by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland. Journal of Pragmatics. 120, 144–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.08.004

[17] Vine, B., Holmes, J., 2023. Doing leadership in style: Pragmatic markers in New Zealand workplace interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics. 20(1), 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2023-0001

[18] Crible, L., Blackwell, S.E., 2020. Introduction: discourse-pragmatic markers in speech and sign. Journal of Pragmatics. 156, 24–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.002

[19] Pan, Z., 2025. Thai EFL learners’ use of the discourse marker like in discourse marker combinations. Ampersand. 14, 100222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2025.100222

[20] Koops, C., Lohmann, A., 2022. Explaining reversible discourse marker sequences: A case study of and and so. Journal of Pragmatics. 191, 156–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.014

[21] Shirtz, S., 2021. And now, co-occurrence and functionality of discourse markers on the Oregon Coast. Journal of Pragmatics. 185, 164–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.001

[22] Vickov, G., Jakupčević, E., 2020. Discourse marker clusters in the classroom discourse of native and non-native EFL teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 19(3), 310–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.17

[23] Rahayu, T., Aziz, M., Permatasari, I., et al., 2021. Discourse markers in EFL student presentations. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Economics, Business and Social Humanities, ICONEBS 2020; 4–5 November 2020; Madiun, Indonesia. pp. 289–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304554

[24] Council of Europe, 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment-companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing: Strasbourg, France.

[25] Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive, 2024. ELAN (MacOS Version) [Computer software]. Available from: https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan

[26] Kirjavainen, M., Crible, L., Beeching, K., 2022. Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um. Language and Speech. 65(2), 263–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211011201

[27] Tübben, I.T., Daniela, L., 2022. Uh and um as pragmatic markers in dialogues: A contrastive perspective on the functions of planners in fiction and conversation. Contrastive Pragmatics. 4(2), 350–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10049

[28] Cuenca, M.J., Marín, M.J., 2009. Co-occurrence of discourse markers in Catalan and Spanish oral narrative. Journal of Pragmatics. 41, 899–914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.010

[29] Ament, J., Parés, J.B., Pérez-Vidal, C., 2020. A study on the functional uses of textual pragmatic markers by native speakers and english-medium instruction learners. Journal of Pragmatics. 156, 41–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.009

[30] Pan, Z., Aroonmanakun, W., 2022. A corpus-based study on the use of spoken discourse markers by Thai EFL learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network. 15(2), 187–213.

[31] Lohmann, A., Koops, C., 2022. Pragmatic marker combinations: Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics. 196, 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.005

[32] Lo, N.P.K., 2024. From structuralism to interpretation: Revisiting the Prague School’s theoretical legacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(6), 1029–1042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7477

Downloads

How to Cite

Pan, Z. (2025). Investigating EFL Learners’ Use of Pragmatic Marker Combinations. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(5), 848–860. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9326

Issue

Article Type

Article