ACOPLE: Enhancing EFL Teacher Competencies through Innovative, Social, and Task-Based Learning in Rural Spain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.9465Abstract
This study presents the ACOPLE (Competency Update for Foreign Language Teachers) micro-project, part of the broader AGORA initiative (Technological and methodological innovation for language teaching and generation of synergies in rural areas). Its main goal is to enhance the second-language communicative competence of rural foreign language teachers in Spain. The project responds to evidence of fossilization or attrition of teachers’ target-language skills caused by scarce opportunities for practice and limited lifelong learning. Designed to provide accessible, engaging professional development in low-resource settings, ACOPLE followed a mixed-methods approach combining synchronous videoconferencing and asynchronous microtasks delivered through mobile and social learning platforms such as WhatsApp and Microsoft Teams. A pilot edition tested the project’s feasibility, yielding high participant motivation and engagement once tasks were understood, alongside a preference for familiar tools like YouTube. However, challenges included weak self-management skills, low confidence in asynchronous interaction, and difficulties with advanced digital tools like ChatGPT. Grounded in the Mobile Open Social Learning for Languages (MOSL4L) framework, ACOPLE demonstrated that microlearning through familiar, flexible, and contextualized tools can enhance professional growth in isolated contexts. Yet, success depends on improved digital literacy support, extended time for task completion, and stronger synchronous guidance. These preliminary results offer actionable insights for refining and scaling teacher training in rural areas through micro-credentials, blended support, and inclusive digital methodologies tailored to underserved educational contexts.
Keywords:
Teacher Training; Rural Education; Language Learning; Technological Resources; Teaching MethodologyReferences
[1] Read, T., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Bárcena, E., et al., 2021. Mobile open social learning for languages (MOSL4L). Journal of Universal Computer Science. 27(5), 425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.67701
[2] Swanson, P., Huff, R., 2010. The Relationship of Georgia's Rural Foreign Language Teachers' Sense of Efficacy to Teacher Attrition. The Rural Educator. 31(3), 16–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v31i3.957
[3] De Prada Creo, E., 1990. The process of fossilization in interlanguage. In Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1990; pp. 1–19.
[4] Toloczko, E., 2024. A cognitive model of language teacher fossilization. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 15(5), 1518–1525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.13
[5] Jonassen, D., Driscoll, M., 2013. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Routledge: New York, NY, USA.
[6] García Aretio, L., 2020. A Semantic jungle: distance/virtual/online/digital/electronic education/teaching/learning…? RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 23(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.1.25495 (in Spanish)
[7] Bárcena, E., 2020. Towards a new paradigm of mobile, open and social second-language learning. Propósitos y Representaciones. 8(1), e460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2020.v8n1.460 (in Spanish)
[8] García Aretio, L., 1987.Towards a definition of distance education. Boletín Informativo de la Asociación Iberoamericana de Educación Superior a Distancia. 4(18). (in Spanish)
[9] García Aretio, L., 1990.Objectives and functions of distance education. In Actas del Congreso Internacional de Filosofía de la Educación, UNED, Madrid, Spain; pp. 44–48. (in Spanish)
[10] García Aretio, L., 2021.COVID-19 and Digital Distance Education: Pre-Confinement, Confinement, and Post-Confinement. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28080 (in Spanish)
[11] Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., et al., 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (cited 30 March 2025).
[12] Read, T., 2014. The architectonics of language MOOCs. In: Monje, E.M., Bárcena, E. (Eds.). Language MOOCs. De Gruyter Open Poland: Warsaw, Poland; pp. 67–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.6
[13] Bárcena, E., Martin Monje, E., Read, T., 2015. Potentiating the human dimension in language MOOCs. In Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on Experiences and Best Practices in and around MOOCs, Mons, Belgium, 18–20 May 2015; pp. 46–54.
[14] Castrillo de Larreta-Azelain, M.D., 2015. Language teaching in MOOCs: the integral role of the instructor. In: Martín-Monje, E., Bárcena, E. (Eds.). Language MOOCs: Providing Learning, Transcending Boundaries. De Gruyter Open Poland: Warsaw, Poland; pp. 67–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/9783110420067.5
[15] Pérez Sanagustín, M., 2017. MOOC for Secondary Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Revista Mexicana de Bachillerato a Distancia. 9(18), 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/cuaed.20074751e.2017.18.64940 (in Spanish)
[16] Traxler, J., 2005. Defining mobile learning. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning, Qwara, Malta, 28–30 June 2005; pp. 261–266. Available from: https://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/defining-mobile-learning (cited 5 March 2025).
[17] Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., et al., 2009. Innovation in mobile learning: a European perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL). 1(1), 13–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2009010102
[18] Kukulska-Hulme, A., Arús Hita, J., García Laborda, J., 2021. Mobile, open and social language learning designs and architectures. Journal of Universal Computer Science. 27(5), 413–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/jucs.68852
[19] Hug, T., 2007. Introductory note. In: Hug, T. (Ed.). Didactics of Microlearning: Concepts, Discourses and Examples. Waxmann: Münster, Germany.
[20] Salinas, J., Marín, V., 2014. Past, present and future of microlearning as a strategy for professional development. Campus Virtuales. 2(3), 46–61. Available from: http://uajournals.com/ojs/index.php/campusvirtuales/article/view/59/58 (in Spanish)
[21] Vilhelm, M., 2024. Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Second Language Classroom: State of the Art and Current Application Possibilities [presentation]. In Summer Course UNED “La inteligencia artificial y el cambio de paradigma en los ámbitos educativos y lingüísticos”, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 2–4 July 2024. (in Spanish)
[22] Barbour, M.K., LaBonte, R., Kelly, K., et al., 2020. Understanding pandemic pedagogy: differences between emergency remote and online teaching. A Special Report of the State of the Nation: K-12 E-Learning in Canada Project. Canadian eLearning Network: Halfmoon Bay, BC, Canada. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31848.70401
Downloads
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Juan José Magaña-Redondo, Monica Vilhelm, María Gracia Moreno Celeghin, Tamara García-Vidal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Juan José Magaña-Redondo 
