-
5440
-
5253
-
2050
-
1968
-
1626
Constructing Environmental Sustainability: A Multimodal Linguistic Analysis of the Green Saudi Initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9526Abstract
This research investigates the synergistic interaction of diverse communication modalities within the promotional video "Championing Climate Action", produced by the Green Saudi Initiative (GSI), and its pivotal role in fostering environmental awareness among Saudi citizens. The video serves as a compelling narrative vehicle that projects Saudi Arabia’s commitment to ecological stewardship and its vision for a sustainable future. By integrating multiple semiotic resources—ranging from evocative visual imagery and emotionally resonant music to carefully crafted linguistic choices and conceptual metaphors—the study explores how these verbal and non-verbal modes work in tandem to deliver a coherent and persuasive message. Grounded in Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis and informed by Stibbe’s (2015) ecolinguistic approach to ecological discourse, the research analyzes the symbolic and communicative power embedded in the video. It pays particular attention to how sustainability themes are constructed, reinforced, and aligned with the cultural, environmental, and religious values specific to Saudi society, while also evaluating their alignment with global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The findings reveal that multimodal strategies are not only effective in enhancing public understanding of climate issues, but also in motivating emotional engagement, encouraging behavioral transformation, and positioning Saudi Arabia as a proactive leader in global environmental sustainability. This study demonstrates the communicative strength of eco-themed media in shaping ecological consciousness and influencing policy discourse within culturally resonant frameworks.
Keywords:
Multimodal Discourse Analysis; Ecolinguistics; Green Saudi Initiative (GSI); Environmental Sustainability; Eco-Cultural ValuesReferences
[1] Castells, M., 2009. Communication power. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
[2] Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, T., 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.
[3] Stibbe, A., 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology, and the stories we live by. Routledge: London, UK.
[4] Fernández-Vázquez, J.S., 2020. Analysing the environmental websites of the world’s greatest polluters: A multimodal ecolinguistic approach. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 34(1), 2692–2711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1836993
[5] Hameed, A., Jabeen, I., Afzal, N., 2022. Towards an eco-friendly future: A corpus-based analysis of media discourse on "Saudi Green Initiative". LEGE ARTIS Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 7(1), 84–119.
[6] Nasir, M.H., Habib, A., Yousaf, M., 2022. Climate change and media representation: A multimodal discourse analysis of Clean Green Pakistan policy from an eco-linguistic perspective. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature. 6(1), 198–211.
[7] Almaghlouth, S., 2022. Environmental sustainability in the online media discourses of Saudi Arabia: A corpus-based study of keyness, intertextuality, and interdiscursivity. PLOS ONE. 17(11), e0277253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277253
[8] Zollo, S.A., 2023. The EU and environmental education: A multimodal ecological discourse analysis. Multimodal Communication. 13(2), 185–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2023-0073
[9] Fadhil, W.N., 2024. Pragma-multimodal discourse analysis of environmental slogans. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 15(3), 911–919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1503.24
[10] Liu, M.Y., Li, J.Y., 2024. Multimodal discourse analysis of public service posters on low-carbon life. Journal of Literature and Art Studies. 14(10), 847–853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2024.10.003
[11] Jabeen, I., 2024. The portrayal of environmental concerns: An ecolinguistic analysis of media discourse. World Journal of English Language. 14(5), 13–24.
[12] Van Leeuwen, T., 2005. Modality in images. In: Van Leeuwen, T., Jewitt, C. (eds.). Handbook of visual analysis. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 33–49.
[13] O’Halloran, K.L., 2011. Multimodal discourse analysis. In: Hyland, K., Wong, L., Paltridge, B. (eds.). The Bloomsbury Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK. pp. 249282.
[14] Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, T., 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge: London, UK.
[15] O’Toole, M., 2011. The language of displayed art, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.
[16] Halliday, M.A.K., 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold: London, UK.
[17] Norris, S., 2004. Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge: London, UK.
[18] Forceville, C., Urios-Aparisi, E., 2009. Multimodal metaphor. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany.
[19] Machin, D., 2010. Analysing popular music: Image, sound, text. SAGE Publications: London, UK.
[20] Halliday, M.A.K., 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd ed. Revised by Matthiessen, C. Arnold: London, UK.
[21] Babaii, E., Atia, M., 2015. Multimodal analysis in educational texts. Rahnama Press: Tehran, Iran.
[22] Lakoff, G., 2010. Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication. 4(1), 70–81.
[23] Lakoff, G., Johnson, M., 1980. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA.
[24] Fairclough, N., 2013. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language, 2nd ed. Routledge: London, UK.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2025 Menna Mohamed Salama El-Masry

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.