Causes and Effects of Non-Rhoticity in Received Pronunciation: Implications for Saudi EFL Learners

Authors

  • Abdurrazzag Alghammas

    Department of English Language and Literature, College of Languages and Humanities, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9723
Received: 27 April 2025 | Revised: 29 May 2025 | Accepted: 16 June 2025 | Published Online: 15 July 2025

Abstract

This study examines the phonological challenges posed by non-rhoticity in Received Pronunciation (RP) for Saudi learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL), with a particular focus on how mother tongue interference and instructional limitations impact the perception and production of non-rhotic features such as linking /r/ and intrusive /r/. Drawing on a six-month qualitative investigation involving 100 Saudi secondary school students, the study employed longitudinal naturalistic observation to document recurring pronunciation patterns in real classroom contexts. The data were thematically analyzed using principles from applied phonology and second language acquisition research, revealing consistent misarticulations of RP-linked features, including difficulties with consonants such as /ð/, /θ/, /z/, and /k/. These pronunciation errors were primarily attributed to first language transfer from Arabic, insufficient exposure to authentic RP input, and a lack of explicit phonological instruction. The findings highlight a significant gap between learners’ exposure to English and their ability to reproduce RP features intelligibly. While RP continues to be valorized in academic and professional domains, it remains largely unfamiliar to learners without targeted phonetic training. The study argues for instructional reforms that integrate RP-based pronunciation into EFL curricula through focused pedagogical strategies, teacher training, and increased access to multimodal input. The research contributes to ongoing debates on English as an International Language (EIL), offering empirical insights into how socio-phonetic variation intersects with learner intelligibility in non-native contexts.

Keywords:

Non-Rhoticity; Received Pronunciation (RP); Saudi EFL Learners; Phonological Interference; English as an International Language (EIL)

References

[1] Levis, J.M., 2018. Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 11–32.

[2] Almusharraf, A., 2022. EFL learners' confidence, attitudes, and practice towards learning pronunciation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 32(1), 126–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12408

[3] Al-khresheh, M.H., 2024. Phonetic challenges in English: the impact of mispronunciation of the bilabial plosive/p/on communication among Saudi EFL learners. Cogent Arts & Humanities. 11(1), 2390777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2390777

[4] Giegerich, H.J., 1992. English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 65-75.

[5] Wells, J.C., Hung, T.T., 1990. Longman pronunciation dictionary. RELC Journal. 21(2), 95–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829002100208

[6] Cruttenden, A., 2014. Gimson's pronunciation of English (8th ed.). Routledge: Oxford, UK. pp. 9–13.

[7] Collins, B., Mees, I.M., 2013. Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). Routledge: Oxford, UK. pp. 2–25.

[8] Alotaibi, W.J., 2018. Teacher-student phonological transference in a Saudi Arabian EFL context: A case study of phonological and attitudinal influences [PhD Thesis]. Southampton: University of Southampton. pp. 163–184.

[9] Trudgill, P., 2000. Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Penguin: London, UK. pp. 80–84.

[10] Wells, J.C., 1982. Accents of English: Volume 1 (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 218–222.

[11] Maghrabi, R., 2021. A phonological study of the influence of Arabic stress on the pronunciation of English words by Saudi ESL learners. Journal of Arts, Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences. (73), 350–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/JALHSS.73.2021.600

[12] Bahanshal, D.A., 2013. The Effect of Large Classes on English Teaching and Learning in Saudi Secondary Schools. English Language Teaching. 6(11), 49–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n11p49

[13] Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J., 2015. Pronunciation errors and error gravity. In: Derwing, T.M., Munro, M.J. (eds.). Pronunciation Fundamentals. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands. pp. 55–76.

[14] Flege, J.E., MacKay, I.R., 2004. Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in second language acquisition. 26(1), 1–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104026117

[15] Khan, I.A., 2011. Learning difficulties in English: Diagnosis and pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Educational Research. 2(7), 1248–1257.

[16] Kang, O., Thomson, R.I., Murphy, J., 2018. The Routledge handbook of contemporary English pronunciation. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 511–526.

[17] Jenkins, J., 2000. The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford university press: Oxford, UK. pp. 123–165.

[18] Walker, R., 2021. Teaching the pronunciation of English as a lingua franca. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 50–66.

[19] Cruttenden, A., 2014. Gimson's pronunciation of English. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 210–220.

[20] Almohawis, K., 2020. Graduate Saudi ESL Students' Perceptions of Writing Pedagogies in EFL versus ESL Contexts: An Approach Toward Understanding Students' Writing Difficulties [PhD Thesis]. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. pp. 75–95.

[21] Almusharraf, A., Aljasser, A., Mahdi, H.S., et al., 2024. Exploring the effects of modality and variability on EFL learners' pronunciation of English diphthongs: a student perspective on HVPT implementation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02632-2

[22] Odlin, T., 2003. Cross‐linguistic influence. In: Doughty , C.J., Long, M.H. (eds.). The handbook of second language acquisition. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 436–486.

[23] Lado, R., 1957. Linguistics across cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press ELT: Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pp. 35–49.

[24] Flege, J.E., 1995. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: Strange, W. (eds.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. York Press: Balti more, MD, USA. pp. 233–277.

[25] Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., 2002. Research methods in education. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 20–33.

[26] Basit, T.N., 2010. Conducting research in educational contexts. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, UK. pp. 35–49.

[27] Bassetti, B., 2023. Effects of orthography on second language phonology: Learning, awareness, perception and production. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 80–90.

[28] Xue, Y., 2023. A Study on the Influence of Mother Tongue Transfer on English Pronunciation of Primary Students. Creative Education. 14(11), 2123–2130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.1411135

[29] Albaqami, R., 2024. Foreign Language Anxiety in Multilingual Context: Speaking Anxiety Experienced by Non-Arabic-Speaking Muslims during Umrah Season in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Al-Arabiyya: Journal of the American Association of Teachers of Arabic. 57(1), 77–102.

[30] Mees, I.M., Collins, B., 2013. Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 252–280.

[31] Shah, S.R., Hussain, M.A., Nasseef, O.A., 2013. Factors impacting EFL teaching: An exploratory study in the Saudi Arabian context. Arab World English Journal. 4(3). 104–123.

[32] Alfawzan, M., 2021. A critical study of EFL pre-service teachers' beliefs about learning and teaching of English: a Saudi Arabian perspective [PhD Thesis]. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. pp. 119–215.

[33] Shin, H., 2007. English language teaching in Korea: Toward globalization or glocalization? In: Cummins, J., Davison, C. (eds.). International handbook of English language teaching. Springer: Boston, MA, USA. pp. 75–86

[34] Parveen, S., Yasmeen, J., Ajmal, M., et al., 2025. Unpacking the doctoral journey in India: Supervision, social support, and institutional factors influencing mental health and research engagement. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 11, 101282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101282

[35] Qamar, M.T., Sohail, S.S., Ansari, G., et al., 2024. The Language of Nuance: Exploring the Limits of Large Language Models in Handling Ambiguity. Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Big Data Analytics; November 26–November 28, 2024; Aizu, Japan. pp. 180–190.

Downloads

How to Cite

Alghammas, A. (2025). Causes and Effects of Non-Rhoticity in Received Pronunciation: Implications for Saudi EFL Learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9723

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 7 (July 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Abdurrazzag Alghammas

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.