Linguistic Genocide of Indigenous Languages in Pakistan and India: A Comparative Analysis of Language Policies and Practices

Authors

  • Hamid Naveed

    Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

  • Muntazar Mehdi

    Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan

  • Sareen Kaur Bhar

    Learning Institute for Empowerment, Multimedia University, Melaka 75450, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.9783
Received: 3 May 2025 | Revised: 26 May 2025 | Accepted: 5 June 2025 | Published Online: 11 September 2025

Abstract

In the postcolonial world, language policies significantly influence the linguistic configuration of nations, often determining the survival or extinction of indigenous languages. This research provides a comparative analysis of Pakistan's and India's language policies and practices to examine whether they promote linguistic diversity or perpetuate linguicism. Data were collected from the constitutions of both countries and credible online sources documenting actual language practices. The study employs textual analysis, using linguicism as the conceptual framework and linguistic imperialism as the analytical framework. Findings reveal that English, as a colonial legacy, continues to shape language policies in both nations. Pakistan officially recognizes English and Urdu, with both dominating key domains such as politics, the economy, law, and education. Indigenous languages are largely marginalized, facing decline and potential extinction due to active linguistic assimilation. India, while also granting English and Hindi significant roles, officially recognizes 22 languages and incorporates them into politics, education, and economic activities, thus fostering a more inclusive linguistic environment. The study concludes that Pakistan exhibits high levels of linguistic discrimination, contributing to the erosion of indigenous languages, whereas India demonstrates relatively lower degrees of linguicism by supporting multilingualism. It calls for the development of inclusive policies that protect and promote indigenous languages, ensuring equitable opportunities for all linguistic communities. Furthermore, the research aligns with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4 (Quality Education) and 10 (Reducing Inequalities), emphasizing the critical role of language policy in expanding access to education and reducing social disparities in postcolonial contexts.

Keywords:

Indigenous Languages; Linguistic Genocide; Linguicism; Language Policy

References

[1] Romaine, S., 2000. Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[2] United Nations, 2024. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations: New York, NY, USA. Available from: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (cited 9 April 2025)

[3] Crystal, D., 2013. Language Death, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[4] Ayres, A., 2009. Speaking Like a State: Language and Nationalism in Pakistan. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[5] Skutnabb-Kangas, T., 1989. Multilingualism and the education of minority children. Estudios Fronterizos. 1989(18), 36–67.

[6] Rahman, T., 2006. Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in Pakistan. In: Saxena, A., Borin, L. (eds.). Lesser-Known Languages of South Asia: Status and Policies, Case Studies and Applications of Information Technology. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany. pp. 73–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197785.1.73

[7] Phillipson, R., 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[8] Phillipson, R., 2012. *Linguistic Imperialism: English and Power in a Global Context*, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. Available from: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/linguistic-imperialism-9780199655266 (cited 9 April 2025)

[9] Phillipson, R., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., 2022. Communicating in “Global” English: Promoting Linguistic Human Rights or Complicit with Linguicism and Linguistic Imperialism. In: Miike, Y., Yin, J. (eds.). The Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory. Routledge: New York, NY, USA. pp. 425–439.

[10] SkutnabbKangas, T., Phillipson, R. (eds.), 1995. Linguistic Human Rights: Overcoming Linguistic Discrimination (Contributions to the Sociology of Language 67). Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 71–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866391

[11] SkutnabbKangas, T., Phillipson, R. (eds.)., 1994. Linguistic Human Rights, Past and Present. In: Language Rights: Critical Concepts in Language Studies, Volume I: Minority Rights to Linguistic Human Rights. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany. pp. 28–67. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110866391.71

[12] Cunningham, C., Stanley, F., 2003. Indigenous by definition, experience, or worldview. BMJ. 327(7412), 403–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7412.403

[13] Eberhard, D.M., Simons, G.F., Fennig, C.D., (eds.), 2025. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 28th ed. SIL International: Dallas, USA. Available from: https://www.ethnologue.com/ethnoblog/welcome-27th-edition/ (3 April 2025)

[14] Richards, J.C., Schmidt, R.W., 2013. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4th ed. Routledge: London, UK.

[15] Brown, H.D., 2014. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching: a Course in Second Language Acquisition. Pearson: London, UK.

[16] Wardhaugh, R., Fuller, J.M., 2021. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA.

[17] Ministry of Home Affairs, 2024. Languages included in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India. Department of Official Language, Government of India. Available from: https://rajbhasha.gov.in/en/languages-included-eighth-schedule-indian-constitution (3 April 2025)

[18] SkutnabbKangas, T., Phillipson, R. (eds.), 2022. The Handbook of Linguistic Human Rights. WileyBlackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119753926

[19] Reserve Bank of India, 2024. Rollover to view features of the New ₹10 Notes. Available from: https://paisaboltahai.rbi.org.in/rupees-ten.aspx (3 April 2025)

[20] Kirszner, L.G., Mandell, S.R., 2011. Patterns for College Writing: a Rhetorical Reader and Guide, 12th ed. Bedford/St Martin's: Boston, MA, USA.

[21] van Schendel, W., 2020. A history of Bangladesh. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

[22] Government of India, 1950. Constitution of India. Legislative Department. Available from: https://legislative.gov.in/constitution-of-india/ (3 April 2025)

[23] Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, 2023. Table 11: Population by mother tongue, sex and rural/urban, Census2023 (national level). Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Available from https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/population/2023/tables/table_11_national.pdf (3 April 2025)

[24] Soofi, M., 2024. Punjab notes: they celebrate the death of their language. Available from: https://www.dawn.com/news/1803972 (3 April 2025)

[25] Abbas, F., Bidin, S.J., 2022. A critical analysis of the language planning and policy (LPP) in Pakistan and its impact on Indigenous languages of Pakistan. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 8(1), 85–96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911521

[26] National Assembly of Pakistan, 1973. Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Available from: https://na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1333523681_951.pdf (3 April 2025)

[27] Torwali, Z., 2018. Strengthening language and identity: a case of Torwali language. Dimension Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 13, 19–42.

[28] Kamath, S., Kamath, R., D’Souza, B., 2018. An overview of systematic linguistic genocide in Pakistan. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 9(13), 1691–1697.

Downloads

How to Cite

Naveed, H., Mehdi, M., & Bhar, S. K. (2025). Linguistic Genocide of Indigenous Languages in Pakistan and India: A Comparative Analysis of Language Policies and Practices. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 698–720. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.9783

Issue

Article Type

Article