Revising with Intelligence: ChatGPT Feedback and Its Impact on EFL Students’ Revision and Self-Efficacy

Authors

  • Yang Yang

    Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
  • Supyan Hussin

    Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
  • Harwati Hashim

    Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9845
Received:3 May 2025 | Revised: 3 June 2025 | Accepted: 10 June 2025 | Published Online: 15 July 2025

Abstract

While prior research on AI-assisted writing has primarily focused on surface-level gains in accuracy or anxiety reduction, this study investigates how ChatGPT-supported feedback affects EFL learners’ writing development across behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions. Employing a quasi-experimental mixed-methods design, 82 university-level EFL students were assigned to either a ChatGPT-supported or teacher-supported writing group. Both groups completed three writing tasks over ten weeks. The ChatGPT group received only ChatGPT feedback, while the teacher group received conventional teacher comments. Pre- and post-intervention measures included writing self-efficacy questionnaires, writing samples, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative results showed that ChatGPT-supported feedback significantly increased revision productivity and led to more macro-level and content-based revisions. Self-efficacy gains in the ChatGPT group were also significantly higher across all three measured dimensions: substantive revision, discourse organization, and writing conventions. Qualitative findings revealed that students in the ChatGPT group perceived the feedback as clearer, more actionable, and more dialogic, which promoted revision ownership, strategic engagement, and confidence. These findings suggest that ChatGPT can function as a cognitive and emotional scaffold, enabling deeper learner engagement with feedback and supporting self-regulated revision. In contrast, teacher feedback, while valued for its credibility, was perceived as less interactive and less helpful for content-level improvement. This study highlights the pedagogical potential of integrating generative AI into process-based writing instruction. By fostering greater revision productivity, deeper feedback engagement, and enhanced writing self-efficacy, ChatGPT can serve as a catalyst for developing more autonomous and reflective EFL writers.

Keywords:

ChatGPT; EFL Writing; Feedback Engagement; Revision Practices; Writing Self-Efficacy; Generative AI; Mixed-Methods Research

References

[1] Li, A.W., Hebert, M., 2024. Unpacking an Online Peer-Mediated and Self-Reflective Revision Process in Second-Language Persuasive Writing. Reading and Writing. 37(6), 1545–1573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10466-8

[2] Tran, T.T.T., 2025. Enhancing EFL Writing Revision Practices: The Impact of AI- and Teacher-Generated Feedback and Their Sequences. Education Sciences. 15(2), 232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020232

[3] Flower, L., Hayes, J.R., 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication. 32(4), 365–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885

[4] Guo, K., Zhang, E.D., Li, D., et al., 2024. Using AI-Supported Peer Review to Enhance Feedback Literacy: An Investigation of Students' Revision of Feedback on Peers' Essays. British Journal of Educational Technology. 6(4), 1612–1639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13540

[5] Hyland, K., Hyland, F., 2006. Feedback on Second Language Students' Writing. Language Teaching. 39(2), 83–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

[6] Han, Y., Hyland, F., 2015. Exploring Learner Engagement With Written Corrective Feedback in a Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing. 30(1), 31–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002

[7] Zhu, Q., Carless, D., 2018. Dialogue Within Peer Feedback Processes: Clarification and Negotiation of Meaning. Higher Education Research and Development. 37(4), 883–897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417

[8] Carless, D., Boud, D., 2018. The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 43(8), 1315–1325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

[9] Huang, J., Teng, M.F., 2025. Peer Feedback and ChatGPT-Generated Feedback on Japanese EFL Students' Engagement in a Foreign Language Writing Context. Digital Applied Linguistics. 2, 102469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29140/dal.v2.102469

[10] Bandura, A., 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman: New York, NY, USA. pp. 1–604.

[11] Vygotsky, L.S., 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, NY, USA. pp. 1–159.

[12] Tajik, A., 2025. Integrating AI-Driven Emotional Intelligence in Language Learning Platforms to Improve English Speaking Skills Through Real-Time Adaptive Feedback. PREPRINT (Version 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5919944/v1(cited 1 Match 2025).

[13] Ferris, D.R., 2006. Does Error Feedback Help Student Writers? New Evidence on Short- and Long-Term Effects of Written Error Correction. In: Hyland, K., Hyland, F. (eds.). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pp. 81–104.

[14] Ferris, D.R., 2014. Responding to Student Writing: Teachers' Philosophies and Practices. Assessing Writing. 19, 6–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.004

[15] Wu, Y., Schunn, C.D., 2020. From Feedback to Revisions: Effects of Feedback Features and Perceptions. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 60, 101826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101826

[16] Yang, L., Li, R., 2024. ChatGPT for L2 Learning: Current Status and Implications. System. 124, 103351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103351

[17] Liu, C., Yu, S., 2022. Reconceptualizing the Impact of Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Multidimensional Perspective. Assessing Writing. 52, 100630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630

[18] Du, J., Alm, A., 2024. The Impact of ChatGPT on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Students' Language Learning Experience: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Education Sciences. 14(7), 726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070726

[19] Guo, X., 2024. Facilitator or Thinking Inhibitor: Understanding the Role of ChatGPT-Generated Written Corrective Feedback in Language Learning. Interactive Learning Environments. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2445177

[20] Liu, Z.M., Hwang, G.J., Chen, C.Q., et al., 2024. Integrating Large Language Models Into EFL Writing Instruction: Effects on Performance, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, and Motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2389923

[21] Banaganipalli, B.N.P., 2025. ChatGPT as a Scaffolding Tool in English Language Teaching. Literary Vibes. 14(1), 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14898233

[22] Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, USA. pp. 1–492.

[23] Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N., 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, USA. pp. 1–488.

[24] Mackey, A., Gass, S.M., 2016. Second Language Research: Methodology and Design, 2nd ed. Routledge: New York, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750606

[25] Zhan, Y., Yan, Z., 2025. Students' Engagement With ChatGPT Feedback: Implications for Student Feedback Literacy in the Context of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2471821

[26] Field, A., 2018. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th ed. SAGE Publications: London, UK. pp. 1–915.

[27] Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[28] Sweller, J., 2011. Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 55, 37–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

[29] Tajik, A., 2025. Beyond Voice Recognition: Integrating Alexa's Emotional Intelligence and ChatGPT's Language Processing for EFL Learners' Development and Anxiety Reduction—A Comparative Analysis. 11 February 2025, PREPRINT (Version 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-5989702/v1

[30] Faigley, L., Witte, S., 1981. Analyzing Revision. College Composition and Communication. 32(4), 400–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115887

[31] Ketonen, L., 2021. Exploring Interconnections Between Student Peer Assessment, Feedback Literacy and Agency [Master's thesis]. University of Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä, Finland.

[32] Xie, X., Yong, M.F., Yap, N.T., 2024. Students' Perceptions of Evaluative Judgement in Technology-Mediated Dialogic Peer Feedback. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 32(4), 1643–1660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.4.19

[33] Rad, H.S., Mirzaei, A., 2024. Developing Feedback Literacy, Scaffolded Writing, and Resilience Through Intervention on Feedback Processes for L2 Writing Students. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 81, 101354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101354

[34] Choi, M.S., 2024. Enhancing Students' Writing Skills Through a Dialogic Process With Instructional AI in the Post-Pandemic Era. In: Tomei, L.A., Carbonara, D.D. (eds.). Exploring Technology-Infused Education in the Post-Pandemic Era. IGI Global: Hershey, USA. pp. 268–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2885-9.ch008

[35] Patil, N.G., Kou, N.L., Baptista-Hon, D.T., et al., 2025. Artificial intelligence in medical education: A practical guide for educators. MedComm-Future Medicine. 4(2), e70018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mef2.70018

[36] Wood, J., 2021. A Dialogic Technology-Mediated Model of Feedback Uptake and Literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 46(8), 1173–1190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174

[37] Daniel, K., Msambwa, M.M., Wen, Z., et al., 2025. Can Generative AI Revolutionise Academic Skills Development in Higher Education? A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Education. 60(1), e70036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70036

[38] Derakhshan, A., 2025. EFL Students' Perceptions About the Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI)-Mediated Instruction in Their Emotional Engagement and Goal Orientation: A Motivational Climate Theory (MCT) Perspective in Focus. Learning and Motivation. 90, 102114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102114

[39] Agostini, D., Picasso, F., 2024. Large Language Models for Sustainable Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: Towards a Pedagogical and Technological Framework. Intelligenza Artificiale. 18(1), 121–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IA-240033

Downloads

How to Cite

Yang, Y., Hussin, S., & Hashim, H. (2025). Revising with Intelligence: ChatGPT Feedback and Its Impact on EFL Students’ Revision and Self-Efficacy. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9845

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 7 (July 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Yang Yang, Supyan Hussin, Harwati Hashim

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.