Linguocultural Aspect of English Phraseological Units With Numbers

Authors

  • Elmira Kydyrmoldina

    Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, Institute of Project Management, K.I. Satbayev Kazakh National Research Technical University, Satbayev St. 22, Almaty, Kazakhstan

  • Raya Darmenkulova

    Department of Kazakh Linguistics named after A. Baytursinuly, Faculty of Philology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave. 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan

  • Abdibek Amirov

    Department of Kazakh Linguistics named after A. Baytursinuly, Faculty of Philology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Ave. 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan

  • Miramkul Sarsembayeva

    Kazakh Language and Literature Department, M. Kh. Dulaty Taraz State University, Suleymenov St. 7, Taraz 080012, Kazakhstan

  • Dosmailova Aigul

    Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, Institute of Project Management, K.I. Satbayev Kazakh National Research Technical University, Satbayev St. 22, Almaty, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.9859
Received: 4 May 2025 | Revised: 13 June 2025 | Accepted: 30 June 2025 | Published Online: 4 August 2025

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive linguocultural analysis of phraseological units containing numerical components, using material from both the English and Kazakh languages. The primary objective of the study is to identify the semantic,structural, and symbolic characteristics of these expressions and to examine their role in reflecting the national worldview and value system of the respective linguistic communities. Phraseological units with numerals are deeply embedded in the collective consciousness and serve as important carriers of cultural knowledge, historical experience, and social norms. The study employs a multi-methodological approach, including lexical-semantic analysis, cultural contextualization, comparative linguistic techniques, and analytical synthesis, allowing for a nuanced understanding of how these expressions function in different cultural and linguistic environments. The research reveals that numerical phraseological units are not random linguistic formations but culturally loaded constructs that convey metaphorical meanings, stereotypes, and shared beliefs. For instance, certain numbers may carry positive or negative connotations depending on cultural context, symbolizing luck, completeness, duality, or limitation. The contrastive analysis between English and Kazakh data uncovers both universal tendencies and culturally specific patterns in the use and interpretation of numerals in idiomatic language.The findings underscore the relevance of such expressions in shaping and transmitting national identity. The practical significance of the study lies in its potential application in fields such as foreign language teaching, translation studies,intercultural communication, and cultural linguistics. Overall, the research highlights the intrinsic connection between language and culture, emphasizing the value of phraseological units as tools for understanding and bridging cultural differences.

Keywords:

Numerical Idioms; Phraseological Units; Cultural Symbolism; Intercultural Linguistics; English and Kazakh Languages

References

[1] Wierzbicka, A., 1997. Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

[2] Sharifian, F., 2017. Cultural Linguistics. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

[3] Ahmetov, Z.K., Shanbayev, T.S., 1998. Dictionary of Literary Terms [in Kazakh]. Ana tili: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 383.

[4] Toleu, A., 2018. Fire Pit [in Kazakh]. Kazakh Encyclopedia: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 185.

[5] Zhanuzak, T.R., Zhunisbek, A.K., 2009. Dictionary of the Kazakh Literary Language [in Kazakh]. Arys: Almaty, Kazakhstan. pp. 580.

[6] Bowler, L., Lopatovska, I., Rosin, M.S., 2023. Teen-adult Interactions During the Co-design of Data Literacy Activities for the Public Library: Insights from a Natural Language Processing Analysis of Linguistic Patterns. Information and Learning Sciences. 125(3/4), 252–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-06-2023-0076

[7] Gravelin, A.C., Archer, B., Oddo, M., et al., 2023. Reliability of a Linguistic Segmentation Procedure Specified by Systemic Functional Linguistics to Examine Extemporaneous Speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 66(4), 1280–1290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00554

[8] Zhang, T., Yang, Z., Chen, S., 2025. A Study on Path Categories in Motion Events. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(2), 72–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.7668

[9] Lewandowski, W., Mateu, J., 2020. Motion Events Again: Delimiting Constructional Patterns. Lingua. 247, 102956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102956

[10] Slobin, D.I., 1997. Mind, Code, and Text. In: Bybee, J.L., Haiman, J., Thompson, S.A. (eds.). Essays on Language Function and Language Type. John Benjamins: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 437–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.82.24slo

[11] Alamri, W., Qasem, F., Alfotais, A., et al., 2025. Leveraging ChatGPT AI Model in Academic Writing and Avenues for Further Development: SWOT Framework. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(2), 61–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8218

[12] Sun, J., Motevalli, S., Chan, N., et al., 2024. Implementation of Self-Regulated Learning Writing Module: Amplifying Motivation and Mitigating Anxiety among EFL Learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 6(3), 89–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6600

[13] Bisriyah, M., 2022. EFL University Students' Difficulties in the Essay Writing Process. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching. 7(1), 66–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v7i1.13793

[14] Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D.F., et al., 2013. Examining Dimensions of Self-Efficacy for Writing. Journal of Educational Psychology. 105(1), 25–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692

[15] Camacho, A., 2021. Writing Motivation in School: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research in the Early Twenty-First Century. Educational Psychology Review. 33(1), 213–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09530-4

[16] Chen, A., 2022. The Effects of Writing Strategy Instruction on EFL Learners' Writing Development. English Language Teaching. 15(3), 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n3p29

[17] Yousaf, A., 2021. Anthropocentric worldview and the role of phraseological units in English language teaching. Journal of Language and Cultural Education. 9(2), 15–27.

[18] Xue, X., 2023. Cross-linguistic study of the number ‘four’ in paremias: a comparative ethnolinguocultural perspective. International Journal of Linguistics. 35(1), 45–59.

[19] Aliyeva, S., 2021. Phraseology as a reflection of national identity: the case of Uzbek and English idioms. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 8(3), 112–120.

[20] Khuzin, I., 2021. Evaluativity in phraseological meaning: a cognitive-semantic approach. Journal of Language and Semiotic Studies. 7(2), 77–89.

[21] Jumayev, A., 2023. Cross-cultural communication and the challenges of idiom translation in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. 12(1), 34–42.

[22] Chen, J., 2020. Sacred numbers in English and Chinese phraseology: a pragmatic study. Journal of Pragmatics. 162, 55–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.003

[23] Kim, S., 2022. Numerical symbolism in Korean and English idioms: a cultural linguistics perspective. International Journal of Cultural Linguistics. 10(1), 23–38.

[24] Singh, P., Patel, R., 2021. Pragmatic competence and number idioms: teaching implications. Language and Intercultural Communication. 21(4), 412–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.1884326

[25] Hernández, M., 2022. Idioms and cultural semantics: a cross-linguistic study. Language, Culture and Society. 5(2), 55–69.

Downloads

How to Cite

Kydyrmoldina, E., Darmenkulova, R., Amirov, A., Sarsembayeva, M., & Aigul, D. (2025). Linguocultural Aspect of English Phraseological Units With Numbers. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(8), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i8.9859