Scientific and Practical Aspects of Communicative Grammar in the Process of Writing

Authors

  • Zinura Utegulova

    Department of Kazakh Language Theory and Teaching Methods, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University,

    Almaty 050010, Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Fauzia Orazbaeva

    Department of Kazakh Language Theory and Teaching Methods, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty 050010, Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Meruert Imankulova

    Department of Kazakh Language Theory and Teaching Methods, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University,

    Almaty 050010, Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Zhazira Issayeva

    Department of the Kazakh Philology, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan 161200, Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Saltanat Beissembayeva

    Department of the Kazakh Philology, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan 161200, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9888
Received: 5 May 2025 | Revised: 9 June 2025 | Accepted: 20 June 2025 | Published Online: 23 July 2025

Abstract

This article examines the scientific and practical foundations of communicative grammar as they relate to the process of writing. This study is relevant because previous research has not sufficiently addressed the methodological aspects of developing communicative grammatical competence in written Kazakh, leaving both theoretical understanding and classroom practice underexplored. The purpose of this article is to develop recommendations for mastering grammatical skills and using communicative methods of teaching the Kazakh language in the process of writing. The results of the study made it possible to claim that the formation of aspects of grammatical skills in the process of writing is considered as an indivisible part of all components of the formation of speech activity. The practical significance of this study lies in the development of a structured set of tasks designed to improve students'writing skills through the use of communicative grammar. Grounded in the principles of communicative language teaching, task-based learning, and functional grammar, these tasks offer a pedagogically sound approach to language instruction. The materials developed in this research can be effectively utilized by educators in designing lessons for both schoolchildren and university students. These resources are particularly relevant for educational institutions across the Republic of Kazakhstan, providing teachers with practical tools to support language development in a communicative and contextually meaningful way.

Keywords:

Motivation; Writing Process; Communicative Approach; Speech Activity; Set of Exercises

References

[1] Abidin, Y., Ramadhona, M.R., Nurdin, M., et al., 2023. The effects of integrating folklore and mixed reality toward student's cultural literacy. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 11(1), 307–319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.1995761.2963

[2] Akbembetova, A.E., Ashirbekov, M.S., Akhmetova, A.A., et al., 2021. Speech interference generated by proverbs and phraseological units of the Russian and Chinese languages. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 9(2), 1–9.

[3] Alsyouf, A., Kayed, M., 2019. Using literary texts in Norwegian language teaching. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes. 9(3), 505–516.

[4] Babineau, M., Christophe, A., 2021. Preverbal infants' sensitivity to grammatical dependencies. Infancy. 27(4), 648–662.

[5] Cotoc, A. (2019). The use of the communicative approach and new technologies during a vocabulary and grammar practical course. Applied Research on English Language, 9(2), 229–252.

[6] Şahoğlu, G., Yağcı, E., Konedrali, G., et al., 2017. Assessment of student views on the communicative behaviours of instructions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 14(3), 877–890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80933

[7] Fazal, S., Majoka, M.I., 2017. Technologies supported communicative grammar translation model: A motivational agent for English learning. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research. 32(1), 175–193.

[8] Kerimbekov, T., Yessenova, K., & Baltabaeva, Z. (2025). Neology Boom in The Language of Collective Consciousness and Electronic Media in Kazakhstan. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8977

[9] Liviero, S., 2017. Grammar teaching in secondary school foreign language learning in England: Teachers' reported beliefs and observed practices. The Language Learning Journal. 45(1), 26–50.

[10] Matsumoto, Y., Iwasaki, S., 2022. Multiplicity in grammar: Modes, genres and speaker's knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics. 198, 4–11.

[11] Pozdniakova, S. (2018). Principles of Education Content in Teaching Foreign-language Professional Communication in Non-linguistic Universities. SHS Web of Conferences. 50. 01141. 10.1051/shsconf/20185001141.

[12] Parizoska, J., 2022. Idiom modifications: What grammar reveals about conceptual structure. Lexis. Journal in English Lexicology. 2022(19), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.6293

[13] Pawlak, M., 2021. Teaching foreign language grammar: New solutions, old problems. Foreign Language Annals. 54(4), 881–896.

[14] Pawlak, M., 2021. The effects of the timing of form-focused instruction on EFL learners' learning of difficult and easy grammatical features: A comparative study. System. 101, 102612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102612

[15] Phoeun, M., Sengsri, S., 2021. The effect of a flipped classroom with communicative language teaching approach on undergraduate students. International Journal of Instruction. 14(3), 1025–1042.

[16] Roeder, R., Araujo-Jones, D., 2020. Grammar in communicative language teaching: Teacher beliefs about theory versus practice. International Journal of English Language Teaching. 8(4), 45–64.

[17] Smart, M.A., 2021. Michel Leiris and the secret language of song. Representations. 154(1), 87–98.

[18] Storme, B., 2022. Implicational generalizations in morphological syncretism: The role of communicative biases. Journal of Linguistics. 58(2), 381–421.

[19] Tan, P., 2020. A study on the application of communicative teaching method in English listening and speaking teaching based on computer and network. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1915(3), 032080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1915/3/032080

[20] Turner, M., 2020. Language as a phenomenon of the third kind. Cognitive Linguistics. 31(2), 213–229.

[21] Turnbull, B., 2020. Towards new standards in foreign language assessment: Learning from bilingual education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 23(4), 488–498.

[22] Van Rooy, R., 2021. From koine to standard: The early modern origin of a key linguistic term. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics. 7(2), 283–302.

[23] Zhumashova, Z., Mussagalieva, G., Tynybekova, G., et al., 2023. Challenges and recommendations for teaching and learning Kazakh as a second language. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 11(2), 119–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2023.1995923.2967

[24] Kerimbekov, T., Yessenova, K., Baltabaeva, Z., 2025. Neology Boom in The Language of Collective Consciousness and Electronic Media in Kazakhstan. Forum for Linguistic Studies. 7(4), 326–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.8977

[25] Alnemrat, A., Aldamen, H., Al-Deaibes, M., et al., 2023. E-learning in a Jordanian higher education institution. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1136142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136142

Downloads

How to Cite

Utegulova, Z., Orazbaeva, F., Imankulova, M., Issayeva, Z., & Beissembayeva, S. (2025). Scientific and Practical Aspects of Communicative Grammar in the Process of Writing. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.9888

Issue

Article Type

Article