The Effects of Typographic Features in Timed Reading Comprehension on Arab EFL Learners

Authors

  • Nada Algharabali

    The English Department, College of Basic Education, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Ardhyia 92400, Kuwait

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9917
Received: 20 April 2025 | Revised: 25 April 2025 | Accepted: 2 May 2025 | Published Online: 7 May 2025

Abstract

The visual characteristics of timed English reading comprehension texts can impact Arab learners who are used to reading from right to left (because of their mother tongue Arabic). The present paper is an experimental study consisting of multiple reading comprehension tasks that examine different text layout variables, namely: interlinear spacing, font size, paragraph distinguishing numbers, and right margin alignment. Two experiments were set up to investigate the effects of visual text layout on reading efficiency. The participants (61 females and 59 males) are students from the English Department at the College of Basic Education, Kuwait. Both reading comprehension experiments were followed by group discussions to obtain qualitative insights of students’ text layout reading preferences. Excel Sheet was utilized to process all quantitative data. The findings demonstrate that students perform better with font size (12pt.), compressed single interlinear spacing, and reading comprehension passages with numbered paragraphs. Moreover, not only were students’ reading performances impaired by right rag alignment texts due to the habitual direction of reading Arabic from right to left, but also the students apparently favored paper-based reading comprehension tests in time-sensitive conditions. Future research could consider more seriously comparative studies between computer-based versus paper-based mediums of assessment, especially in terms of timed reading comprehension tests.

Keywords:

Typography; Timed-Reading; Comprehension; Reading-Efficiency; EFL

References

[1] Soleimani, H., Mohammadi, E., 2012. The effect of text typographical features on legibility, comprehension, and retrieval of EFL learners. English Language Teaching. 5(8), 207–216.

[2] Lonsdale, M.D.S., 2014. The effect of text layout on performance: A comparison between types of questions that require different reading processes. Information Design Journal. 21(3), 279–299.

[3] Chelesnik, A.L., 2009. The impact of test typography on student achievement, anxiety, and typographic preferences [Master’s Thesis]. San Marcos, CA, USA: California State University.

[4] Lonsdale, M.D.S., Dyson, M.C., Reynolds, L., 2006. Reading in examination‐type situations: The effects of text layout on performance. Journal of Research in Reading. 29(4), 433–453.

[5] Legge, G.E., Bigelow, C.A., 2011. Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision. 11(5:8), 1–22.

[6] Rello, L., Pielot, M., Marcos, M.C., 2016. Make it big! The effect of font size and line spacing on online readability. Proceedings of the May 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; San Jose, CA, USA; 7–12 May 2016. pp. 3637–3648.

[7] Yu, J., Zhou, X., Yang, X., et al., 2022. Mobile-assisted or paper-based? The influence of the reading medium on the reading comprehension of English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 35(1–2), 217–245.

[8] Dillon, A., McKnight, C., Richardson, J., 1988. Reading from paper versus reading from screen. The Computer Journal. 31(5), 457–464.

[9] Geske, J., 1996. Legibility of sans serif type for use as body copy in computer mediated communication. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED399590 (cited 9 December 2024).

[10] Bernard, M.L., Chaparro, B.S., Mills, M.M., et al., 2003. Comparing the effects of text size and format on the readability of computer-displayed Times New Roman and Arial text. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies. 59(6), 823–835.

[11] Dyson, M.C., 2004. How physical text layout affects reading from the screen. Behavior & Information Technology. 23(6), 377–393.

[12] Sheppard, S.M., Nobles, S.L., Palma, A., et al., 2023. One font doesn't fit all: The influence of digital text personalization on comprehension in child and adolescent readers. Education Sciences. 13(9), 864.

[13] Hartley, J., Burnhill, P., 1977. Fifty guide-lines for improving instructional text. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology. 14(1), 65–73.

[14] Paterson, D.G., Tinker, M.A., 1932. Studies of typographical factors influencing speed of reading. X. Style of type face. Journal of Applied Psychology. 16(6), 605–613.

[15] Gasser, M., Boeke, J., Heffernan, M., et al., 2005. The influence of font type on information recall. North American Journal of Psychology. 7(2), 181–189.

[16] Dykes, R., Hauca, M., 2019. Sans Forgetica: Typography's effect on ESL/EFL reading comprehension. Proceedings of the 27th Korea TESOL International Conference; Seoul, Republic of Korea; 12–13 October 2019. pp. 53–60.

[17] Lin, H., Wu, F.G., Cheng, Y.Y., 2013. Legibility and visual fatigue affected by text direction, screen size and character size on color LCD e-reader. Displays. 34(1), 49–58.

[18] Block, E., 1986. The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly. 20(3), 463–494.

[19] Anderson, N.J., 1991. Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal. 75(4), 460–472.

Downloads

How to Cite

Algharabali, N. (2025). The Effects of Typographic Features in Timed Reading Comprehension on Arab EFL Learners. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(5), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i5.9917

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 5 (May 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Nada Algharabali

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.