Research in Ecology Establishes Strategic Academic Partnership with the Central Asian Climate Science Forum 2026
2026-07-22
Ecological Governance in the Mekong: U.S. Engagement and ASEAN’s Role amid Strategic Rivalry with China
Authors
-
Nguyen Xuan Trung
Institute for South Asian, West Asian and African Studies, Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
-
Tran Xuan Hiep
Faculty of History, Geography, and Political Science, The University of Da Nang, University of Science and Education, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i4.13383Abstract
The Mekong River, sustaining over 60 million people across mainland Southeast Asia, has emerged as a critical arena where transboundary water governance, environmental sustainability, and great power competition converge. As China consolidates its upstream influence through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Mekong–Lancang Cooperation (MLC)—reshaping downstream hydrological conditions through an extensive Lancang dam cascade and deepening structural dependencies among smaller riparian states—the United States has recalibrated its engagement through the Mekong–U.S. Partnership (MUSP), emphasizing transparency, environmental standards, and multilateral cooperation as a strategic counterweight. ASEAN, as the region’s principal multilateral institution, must navigate this intensifying rivalry while confronting the ecological deterioration of a basin whose fisheries, agricultural systems, and community livelihoods face compounding pressure from hydropower development and climate change. This paper examines how major powers have adjusted their Mekong strategies since 2016, analyzes the environmental consequences of those adjustments through the water–energy–food–environment (WEFE) nexus and socio-hydrology frameworks, and assesses the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)’s institutional capacity to embed sustainability into basin governance. Drawing on a qualitative and comparative research design, the study situates the Mekong alongside the Nile, Danube, Indus, and Amazon basins to identify transferable governance mechanisms. The findings reveal that while ASEAN possesses meaningful institutional frameworks, its collective action capacity remains constrained by internal member-state divergences and its non-interference principle. The study concludes that incremental, technically grounded governance reforms pursued through ASEAN’s convening role represent the most realistic pathway toward a more sustainable and cooperative Mekong governance architecture.
Keywords:
Mekong Basin; ASEAN; Water Governance; U.S.–China Strategic Rivalry; WEFE NexusReferences
[1] Orieschnig, C.A., Venot, J.-P., 2024. The history of hydrological studies on the Mekong floodplains—From colonial experiments to computational models. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 69(16), 2391–2404.
[2] Mondal, A., Le, M.-H., Lakshmi, V., 2022. Land use, climate, and water change in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta (VMD) using earth observation and hydrological modeling. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 42, 101132.
[3] Grumbine, R.E., Xu, J., 2011. Mekong hydropower development. Science. 332(6026), 178–179.
[4] Xie, L., 2022. Asian water tower and Mekong sustainability. Environmental Politics. 31(5), 789–808.
[5] Telle, A., 2024. Basin organization and members’ development agenda in the Global South. Water International. 49(3–4), 298–309.
[6] Asian Development Bank, 2015. The Greater Mekong Subregion Economic Cooperation Program Strategic Framework 2012–2022. Asian Development Bank: Manila, Philippines.
[7] Busbarat, P., 2018. Grabbing the Forgotten: China’s Leadership Consolidation in Mainland Southeast Asia through the Mekong–Lancang Cooperation. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Commentary: Singapore. Available from: https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/ISEAS_Perspective_2018_7@50.pdf
[8] Bharti, M.S., Kumari, S., 2024. China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia and its implications for ASEAN-China strategic partnership. Asian Review of Political Economy. 3, 22.
[9] Rolland, N., 2017. China’s Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. National Bureau of Asian Research: Washington, DC, USA.
[10] Azizi, S., 2025. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): A strategic framework for ASEAN engagement. Discover Global Society. 3, 119.
[11] Haefner, A., Po, S., 2025. Legitimacy and Hydropolitics in the Mekong Region: Lao PDR and Cambodia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251398549
[12] Mallick, S., 2024. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Impact on South Asia’s Geopolitical Landscape and Regional Dynamics. Jadavpur Journal of International Relations. 28(1), 7–30.
[13] Bower, E., Parameswaran, P., 2012. U.S. Moves to Strengthen ASEAN by Boosting the Lower Mekong Initiative. Center for Strategic and International Studies: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-moves-strengthen-asean-boosting-lower-mekong-initiative
[14] Keshap, A., 2021. Remarks on the Mekong–U.S. Partnership. U.S Track 1.5 Policy Dialogue Opening Plenary. Department of State: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://2021-2025.state.gov/remarks-at-the-mekong-u-s-partnership-track-1-5-policy-dialogue-opening-plenary/
[15] East-West Center, 2020. The US and the Mekong Region: Cooperation for Sustainable andInclusive Economic Growth. East-West Center Policy Studies: Honolulu, HI, USA. Available from: https://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/private/ewwire055limaye.pdf
[16] Ha, H.T., 2023. Is the US a Serious Competitor to China in the Lower Mekong? ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Commentary: Singapore. Available from: https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2023-37-is-the-us-a-serious-competitor-to-china-in-the-lower-mekong-by-hoang-thi-ha/
[17] Minh, N.V., 2022. Renewable energy in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta: Current status and solutions. Journal of Environment and Water Engineering. 12(1), 19–27.
[18] Tinh, L.D., 2022. ASEAN and the Mekong: A Functional Approach. Asia Policy. 17(2), 63–68.
[19] Kittikhoun, A., 2026. How Small States Can Survive Big Changes: Laos, Mekong and ASEAN in the Age of Might Makes Right. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Commentary: Singapore. Available from: https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2026-32-how-small-states-can-survive-big-changes-laos-mekong-and-asean-in-the-age-of-might-makes-right-by-anoulak-kittikhoun/
[20] Teo, S., Eyler, B., Li, Z., et al., 2022. Interests, initiatives, and influence: Geopolitics in the Mekong Subregion. Asia Policy. 17(2), 2–6.
[21] Phan, X.D., 2025. Vietnam’s hedging amid U.S.–China Mekong rivalry: Risk management under uncertainties. The Pacific Review. 38(4), 646–674.
[22] Allan, T., 2011. Virtual Water: Tackling the Threat to Our Planet’s Most Precious Resource. I.B. Tauris: London, UK.
[23] Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H.H.G., Blöschl, G., 2012. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes. 26(8), 1270–1276.
[24] Haefner, A., 2024. Water governance in the Mekong region: The role and impact of civil society organizations. Water International. 49(3–4), 310–317.
[25] Mekong River Commission, 2022. Mekong Low Flow and Drought Conditions in 2019–2021: Hydrological Conditions in the Lower Mekong River Basin. Mekong River Commission: Vientiane, Laos. Available from: https://www.mrcmekong.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/LowFlowReport20192021.pdf
[26] Xie, L., Xu, L., Yu, Q., 2023. Benefit sharing in international rivers: A Q-methodology study of regional understanding and perception in Asia. PLOS One. 18(1), e0280625.
[27] Ranjan, A., 2025. Indus Waters Treaty Negotiations: Geopolitics, Disputes and Cooperation. South Asia Research. 45(1), 110–131.
[28] Pompeo, M., 2020. The Mekong–U.S. Partnership: The Mekong Region Deserves Good Partners. U.S. Department of State: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://asean.usmission.gov/the-mekong-u-s-partnership-the-mekong-region-deserves-good-partners/
[29] U.S. Department of State, 2020. Mekong-U.S. Partnership Joint Ministerial Statement. U.S. Department of State: Washington, DC, USA. Available from: https://2017-2021.state.gov/mekong-u-s-partnership-joint-ministerial-statement/
[30] Mallick, P., 2022. Transboundary River Cooperation in Mekong Basin: A Sub-regional Perspective. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs. 9(1), 50–71.
Downloads
How to Cite
Trung, N. X., & Hiep, T. X. (2026). Ecological Governance in the Mekong: U.S. Engagement and ASEAN’s Role amid Strategic Rivalry with China. Research in Ecology, 8(4), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i4.13383
Issue
Article Type
Article
License
Copyright © 2026 Nguyen Xuan Trung, Tran Xuan Hiep
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.
