
A Hybrid Multi-Sensor Monitoring Framework for Spatial Screening of Particulate and Gaseous Pollutants around a Tropical Urban Landfill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30564/re.v8i5.13920Abstract
Open landfills generate complex mixtures of particulate and gaseous pollutants that can affect nearby communities. However, distance alone does not adequately explain their short-term spatial distribution. This study characterized multiple air pollutants surrounding the Tamangapa Landfill in Indonesia, compared concentrations between near and outer zones, and examined their relationships with distance and meteorological conditions. Field observations were conducted at nine locations situated 200–640 m from a central reference point. PM₁.₀, PM₂.₅, PM₁₀, formaldehyde, total volatile organic compounds (TVOC), CO, CO₂, CH₄, H₂S, O₂, and the lower explosive limit (LEL) were measured using complementary portable sensors. Analytical methods included descriptive statistics, Mann–Whitney tests, Cliff's delta, Spearman correlations, and Benjamini–Hochberg corrections. Particulate concentrations exhibited substantial spatial heterogeneity, with maximum PM₁.₀, PM₂.₅, and PM₁₀ concentrations of 146, 242, and 272 µg/m³, respectively. Mean concentrations in the near zone were approximately 3.6–3.7 times higher than those in the outer zone. TVOC showed a strong negative correlation with distance (rₛ = −0.812; p = 0.0079), although this association did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple testing (q = 0.063). Pollutant distributions appeared to reflect interactions among distance, plume orientation, meteorological conditions, measurement time, and local activities. This study introduces a hybrid multi-sensor screening framework that integrates particulate, gaseous, spatial, and meteorological measurements for tropical landfill environments, particularly in resource-limited settings where conventional monitoring networks remain limited.
Keywords:
Particulate Matter; Formaldehyde; Total Volatile Organic Compounds; Open Landfill; Portable Air-Quality SensorReferences
[1] Awino, F.B., Apitz, S.E., 2024. Solid waste management in the context of the waste hierarchy and circular economy frameworks: An international critical review. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 20(1), 9–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4774
[2] Choudhury, M., Suhag, M., Jha, P., et al., 2025. Urban waste management and challenges in emerging smart city systems governance and circular economy perspectives. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology. 26(10), 243–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/211014
[3] United Nations Environment Programme, International Solid Waste Association, 2024. Global Waste Management Outlook 2024 - Beyond an Age of Waste: Turning Rubbish into a Resource. United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya.
[4] Ramadan, B.S., Istirokhatun, T., Priguna, K., et al., 2026. Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Mitigation Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture in Grobogan District, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning. 21(1), 61–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.210106
[5] Ramadan, B.S., Wibowo, Y.G., Puspita, A.S., et al., 2026. Reducing open waste burning practices in selected Asian countries: policy, regulatory, institutional capacity, and SWOT assessment. Waste Management Bulletin. 4(3), 100332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2026.100332
[6] Gunarathne, V., Phillips, A.J., Zanoletti, A., et al., 2024. Environmental pitfalls and associated human health risks and ecological impacts from landfill leachate contaminants: Current evidence, recommended interventions and future directions. Science of The Total Environment. 912, 169026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169026
[7] Damiati, S., AlMashrea, B.A., Rabiei, N., et al., 2025. Aerosol Pollutants and Health: Role of Size and Chemical Composition. Public Health Challenges. 4(4), e70134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.70134
[8] Siddiqua, A., Hahladakis, J.N., Al-Attiya, W.A.K.A., 2022. An overview of the environmental pollution and health effects associated with waste landfilling and open dumping. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 29(39), 58514–58536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21578-z
[9] Ramadan, B.S., Paranagamage, L.C., Hayashi, M., et al., 2026. Assessment of environmental impact of open waste burning activity in Asia and Pacific: A methodological update. Atmospheric Environment. 367, 121747. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121747
[10] Priyambada, I.B., Sudarno, Budihardjo, M.A., et al., 2026. Refuse-derived fuel as a waste-to-energy strategy: Economic feasibility and environmental impact assessment in urban waste management. Hybrid Advances. 14, 100707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2026.100707
[11] Hamanaka, R.B., Mutlu, G.M., 2025. Particulate matter air pollution: effects on the respiratory system. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 135(17), e194312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI194312
[12] Sangkham, S., Phairuang, W., Sherchan, S.P., et al., 2024. An update on adverse health effects from exposure to PM2.5. Environmental Advances. 18, 100603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100603
[13] Wang, M., Kim, R.Y., Kohonen-Corish, M.R.J., et al., 2025. Particulate matter air pollution as a cause of lung cancer: epidemiological and experimental evidence. British Journal of Cancer. 132(11), 986–996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-02999-2
[14] Manco, A., Ciccioli, P., Famulari, D., et al., 2022. Real-time air concentrations and turbulent fluxes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) over historic closed landfills to assess their potential environmental impact. Environmental Pollution. 309, 119748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119748
[15] Pei, Z., Kelly, K.E., 2025. Laboratory Cross-Sensitivity Evaluation of Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensors. Sensors. 25(10), 3096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103096
[16] Salthammer, T., 2022. TVOC - Revisited. Environment International. 167, 107440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107440
[17] Meciarova, L., Vilcekova, S., 2016. Determination of VOCs in the Indoor Air of a New and a Renovated Apartment. Selected Scientific Papers - Journal of Civil Engineering. 11(1), 107–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sspjce-2016-0012
[18] Qin, X., Hou, L., Gao, J., et al., 2020. The evaluation and optimization of calibration methods for low-cost particulate matter sensors: Inter-comparison between fixed and mobile methods. Science of The Total Environment. 715, 136791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136791
[19] Considine, E.M., Reid, C.E., Ogletree, M.R., et al., 2021. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network. Environmental Pollution. 268, 115833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115833
[20] Rusni, N.K., 2024. Permasalahan sampah kota Makassar studi kasus TPA Tamangapa. Waste Handling and Environmental Monitoring. 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.61511/whem.v1i1.2024.511
[21] Nurfadillah, Imran, I.H., 2024. Analisa Risiko Emisi GHG terhadap Kesehatan Masyarakat di Sekitar TPA Tamangapa di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Bangunan Konstruksi (BARAKKA). 2(1), 53–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63877/jbk.v2i1.49
[22] Raihanah, N.D., Yuliati, Sani, A., 2025. Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Keluhan Gangguan Pernapasan Pada Pemulung Di Tempat Pembuangan Akhir Sampah (TPAS) Tamangapa Kota Makassar. Window of Public Health Journal. 6(1), 161–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33096/woph.v6i1.2053
[23] Yusran, Misbahuddin, A.F., Akil, Y.S., 2020. Waste power plant based on methane gas at Tamangapa Landfill Makassar: a potential study. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 473(1), 012101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/473/1/012101
[24] World Meteorological Organization, 2024. Guide to Instruments and Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8). World Meteorological Organization: Geneva, Switzerland.
[25] Clements, A., Duvall, R., Greene, D., et al., 2022. The Enhanced Air Sensor Guidebook. EPA/600/R-22/213. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA.
[26] U.S. Department of Labor, 2024. Calibrating and Testing Direct-Reading Monitors. Safety and Health Information Bulletin SHIB 11-26-2024. U.S. Department of Labor: Washington, DC, USA.
[27] Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Yang, H., et al., 2022. Occupational health risk assessment of BTEX in municipal solid waste landfill based on external and internal exposure. Journal of Environmental Management. 305, 114348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114348
[28] World Health Organization, 2010. WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants. WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/260127
[29] Hoang, A.N., Pham, T.T.K., Mai, D.T.T., et al., 2022. Health risks and perceptions of residents exposed to multiple sources of air pollutions: A cross-sectional study on landfill and stone mining in Danang city, Vietnam. Environmental Research. 212, 113244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113244
[30] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 2021. Government Regulation (PP) Number 22 of 2021: Implementation of Environmental Protection and Management. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia: Jakarta, Indonesia. Available from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/161852/pp-no-22-tahun-2021 (in Indonesian)
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Article Type
License
Copyright © 2026 Sattar Yunus, Ismail Marzuki, Mardiyyah Hasnawi, Muh. Ramzi Al Faqih, Annisa Sila Puspita

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.





Sattar Yunus