Slang Terms in the Field of Information Technology and Their Standardization

Authors

  • Aigul Amirbekova

    The Institute of Linguistics named after Akhmet Baitursunuly, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

  • Sarsenbai Kulmanov

    The Institute of Linguistics named after Akhmet Baitursunuly, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

  • Anar Fazylzhanova

    The Institute of Linguistics named after Akhmet Baitursunuly, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

  • Akmaral Bissengali

    The Institute of Linguistics named after Akhmet Baitursunuly, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

  • Aiyagul Omarova

    The Institute of Linguistics named after Akhmet Baitursunuly, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.10091
Received: 19 May 2025 | Revised: 29 May 2025 | Accepted: 3 June 2025 | Published Online: 5 June 2025

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology (IT) has led to the emergence of a vast array of slang terms, many of which originate from English and spread globally through professional, academic, and digital communication. These slang expressions—such as bug, crash, lag, hack, and code—often fill lexical gaps quickly and flexibly, reflecting the dynamic and innovative nature of the IT field. However, the widespread and unregulated use of IT slang poses challenges for linguistic clarity, educational consistency, and terminological standardization, especially in multilingual contexts such as Kazakhstan, where Kazakh, Russian, and English coexist. The purpose of this article is to analyze the emergence and use of slang terms in the field of IT, explore their linguistic and sociocultural impact, and propose approaches for their effective standardization. The practical significance of this article lies in its contribution to the development of effective strategies for managing and standardizing rapidly evolving IT slang. This paper examines the origin, usage, and dissemination of IT-related slang terms, with a focus on how they are adopted, localized, and sometimes hybridized in non-English languages. It also explores the sociolinguistic implications of IT slang use among professionals and youth, including code-switching, language borrowing, and the blending of formal and informal registers. A key focus is the need for systematic standardization of IT terminology to ensure clear communication, promote the development of native-language equivalents, and preserve linguistic integrity. The study reviews current approaches to slang standardization, highlights efforts by linguistic institutions and technical committees, and proposes practical strategies for integrating standardized terms into education, media, and professional discourse.

Keywords:

IT Slang; ISO Terminology; Professional Vocabulary; Standardization; Jargon

References

[1] Keidar, D., Opedal, A., Jin, Z., et al., 2022. Slangvolution: A causal analysis of semantic change and frequency dynamics in slang (Version 2). arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.04689

[2] Shamieva, N.A., 2022. Reasons and ways of computer slang and jargon formations. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 14, 8–10.

[3] Sun, Z., Zemel, R., Xu, Y., 2022. Semantically informed slang interpretation. arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.00616

[4] Paoleti, V.D., Mujahidah, N.F.Z., 2024. Youth language uncovered: meta-synthetic Insights into Gen Z and Gen Alpha slang. English Review: Journal of English Education. 13(1), 9–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v13i1.11425

[5] Lackova, M., Hundarenko, O., Moskalenko, O., et al., 2019. Word-formation characteristics of Anglicisms in the Russian slang. International Journal of English Linguistics. 9(5), 283–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n5p283

[6] Tufail, S., Asgher, M., Ali, I., 2024. Deciphering the digital vernacular: a study of generation Z slang on social media platforms. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review. 8(2), 835–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-II)75

[7] Guo, Y., Chang, J.C., Antoniak, M., et al., 2023. Personalized Jargon identification for enhanced interdisciplinary communication. arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.255

[8] Sun, Z., Hu, Q., Gupta, R., et al., 2024. Toward informal language processing: knowledge of slang in large language models. arXiv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.02323

[9] Coleman, J., 2012. The life of slang. Oxford University Press: New York, NW, USA. pp. 1–353.

[10] Crystal, D., 2001. Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press, MA, USA. pp. 1–272.

[11] Yule, G., 2010. The Study Of Language, 4th ed. Cambridge University Press, MA, USA. pp. 1–340.

[12] Kageura, K., 2002. An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Monolingual and Multilingual Culture-Bound Communication. In: Temmerman, R., Van Campenhoudt, M. (eds.). The Dynamics of Terminology. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 1–14.

[13] Temmerman, R., 2000. Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Socio-Cognitive Approach. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 1–274.

[14] Ahmad, K., Rogers, M., 2001. Corpus Linguistics and Terminology Extraction. In: Granger, S., Hung, J., Petch-Tyson, S. (eds.). Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 227–245.

[15] International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), n.d. ISO/IEC JTC 1 – Information technology. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/committee/45020.html (cited January 20 2025).

[16] Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), n.d. Standards Association. Available from: https://standards.ieee.org/ (cited January 20 2025).

[17] TermNet – International Network for Terminology, n.d. Available from: https://www.termnet.org/ (cited March 20 2025).

[18] American National Standards Institute (ANSI), n.d. Available from https://www.ansi.org/ (cited March 20 2025).

[19] GOST – Russian National Standardization System. Refer to: Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology (Rosstandart), n.d. Available from https://www.gost.ru/ (cited March 20 2025).

[20] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), n.d. ISO/IEC 2382: Information technology–Vocabulary. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/63598.html (cited March 20 2025).

[21] Faber, P., 2012. A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Boston. pp. 1–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203

[22] Pesina, S.G., Anikina, Z.N., Ivanova, N.A., 2024. Functions and formation mechanisms of youth slang in the modern Russian language. Russian Linguistic Bulletin. (2), 85–90.

[23] Sosnowski, W., 2016. Word formation in contemporary Russian student slang. Slavistica Vilnensis. 61, 112–119.

[24] Volkova, A.A., Chernyavskaya, V.E., 2021. Gaming slang in the Russian media space: features and functions. Media Linguistics. 8(3), 79–89.

[25] Lacková, M., Dronova, A., Chernysheva, E., 2019. Anglicisms in contemporary Russian slang: word formation and adaptation. XLinguae. 12(3), 70–81.

[26] Gaybullaeva, S.U., Azimova, D.A., 2023. The impact of youth slang on oral and written communication in the digital age. Russian Linguistic Bulletin. (2), 56–60.

Downloads

How to Cite

Amirbekova, A., Kulmanov, S., Fazylzhanova, A., Bissengali, A., & Omarova, A. (2025). Slang Terms in the Field of Information Technology and Their Standardization. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.10091

Issue

Article Type

Article