Cross-Cultural Persuasive Strategies in Saudi and British Anti-Smoking Advertisements: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis

Authors

  • Darene Almalki

    Department of English, Faculty of Languages and Translation, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia

    Department of English, College of Language Sciences,King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11857
Received: 28 August 2025 | Revised: 30 September 2025 | Accepted: 10 October 2025 | Published Online: 20 November 2025

Abstract

Smoking is a major cause of preventable death globally despite decades of tobacco control efforts, including antismoking campaigns. While interest in the cross-cultural dynamics of public health discourse has grown, only few studies have systematically compared multimodal strategies across different cultural contexts. This study contributes to this under researched area by investigating how Saudi and British anti-smoking advertisements differ in their persuasive strategies and what these differences reveal about their cultural contexts. This study employs a qualitative, multimodal discourse analysis approach to examine anti-smoking advertisements by applying Kress and van Leeuwen's framework to the visual mode and the textual level of Fairclough’s framework to the verbal mode. The aim is to interpret culturally embedded persuasive strategies through a comparative lens. The corpus was purposively sampled, consisting of six anti-smoking advertisements: three produced by the Saudi Ministry of Health and three by the British National Health Service, all published between 2018 and 2023. The advertisements were paired based on similarity in three shared themes: (i) respiratory system, (ii) smoker's experience, and (iii) pregnancy. The analysis revealed a consistent pattern: Saudi advertisements relied heavily on fear-based, loss-framed appeals conveyed through an authoritative verbal tone. British advertisements, by contrast, favoured hope-based, gain-framed messaging, using inclusive language to construct viewer engagement. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of public health communication lies not only in content but also in its resonance with cultural values. This study highlights the importance of culture in shaping the multimodal construction of persuasion. It extends the application of multimodal discourse analysis to understudied cultural domains and invites future research on culturally sensitive health communication.

Highlights:

  • The study offers a systematic comparative multimodal analysis of Saudi and British anti-smoking advertisements using Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2021) framework.
  • It identifies culturally different persuasive strategies: Saudi advertisements rely on fear-based, loss-framed appeals; British ones favour hope-based, gain-framed messaging.
  • The paper contributes to the underexplored area of Arabic visual discourse within public health communication.
  • The findings illustrate how visual and verbal resources are mobilised differently across collectivist and individualist cultures to convey health messages.

Keywords:

Multimodal Discourse Analysis; Visual Grammar; Message Framing; Anti-Smoking Advertisements; Public Health Discourse; Persuasive Strategies

References

[1] World Health Organisation, 2025. Tobacco. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco (cited 25 June 2025).

[2] Miller, C., Foubert, B., Reardon, J., et al., 2007. Teenagers’ response to self- and other-directed anti-smoking messages: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Market Research. 49(4), 515–538.

[3] Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Zhang, Q., et al., 2001. A cross-cultural study of the persuasive effect of fear appeal messages in cigarette advertising: China and Canada. International Journal of Advertising. 20(3), 297–317.

[4] Kress, G., Van Leeuwen, T., 2021. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 3rd ed. Routledge: London, UK. pp. 1–222.

[5] Fairclough, N., 2001. Language and Power, 2nd ed. Longman: London, UK.

[6] Ibrahim, W., 2020. Persuasion in anti-smoking advertisements: A multimodal approach. Cairo Studies in English. 1, 42–66.

[7] Siregar, M., Sinar, T., 2021. Visual metafunction in cigarette A Mild advertisements: A multimodal analysis. LingPoet: Journal of Linguistics and Literary Research. 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/lingpoet.v2i1.5256

[8] Ananda, R., Fitriani, S.S., Samad, I.A., et al., 2019. Cigarette advertisements: A systemic functional grammar and multimodal analysis. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 8(3), 616–626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15261

[9] Halliday, M.A.K., 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold: London, UK. p. 101.

[10] Jewitt, C., Oyama, R., 2001. Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In: Van Leeuwen, T., Jewitt, C. (Eds.). Handbook of visual analysis. SAGE: London, UK. pp. 134–156.

[11] Ledin, P., Machin, D., 2019. Final reply. Critical Discourse Studies. 16(5), 540–548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1614469

[12] Jones, R., 2020. Multimodal discourse analysis. In: Chapelle, C.A. (Ed.). The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA. pp. 790–795.

[13] Forceville, C., 1999. Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s reading images: The grammar of visual design (1996). Language and Literature. 8(2), 163–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204

[14] Yong, Q., Rao, X., 2024. Exploring textual–visual strategies in internet-based light food advertising: A study of Taobao advertisements in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11(1), Article 27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03087-1

[15] Liu, H., Liu, L., Li, H., 2024. Multimodal discourse studies in the international academic community (1997–2023): A bibliometric analysis. SAGE Open. 14(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241305454

[16] Friedman, A., Ron, S., 2017. Unlocking the power of visual grammar theory: Analyzing social media political advertising messages in the 2016 US election. Journal of Visual Literacy. 36(2), 90–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1051144x.2017.1379758

[17] Lennon, H.W., Kilby, L., 2020. A multimodal discourse analysis of ‘Brexit’: Flagging the nation in political cartoons. In: Demasi, M.A., Burke, S., Tileagă, C. (Eds.). Political Communication. Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland. pp. 115–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60223-9_5

[18] Kilby, L., Lennon, H., 2021. When words are not enough: Combined textual and visual multimodal analysis as a critical discursive psychology undertaking. Methods in Psychology. 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100071

[19] Zhang, W., Jamal, M.B., Mahfoodh, O.H.A., et al., 2022. A multimodal discourse analysis of TED talks in health care. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology. 27(3), 67–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5912/jcb1274

[20] Hussein, A., Aljamili, L., 2020. COVID-19 humor in Jordanian social media: A socio-semiotic approach. Heliyon. 6(12), e05696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05696

[21] Khalil, H., 2024. Coping strategies and restrictions during COVID-19 pandemic: A multimodal discourse analysis of some selected cartoons and comics. Journal of the Faculty of Arts Port Said University. 28(28), 1–35.

[22] Hodge, R., Kress, G., 1988. Social Semiotics. Cornell University Press: New York, NY, USA.

[23] Bezemer, J., Kress, G., 2008. Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication. 25(2), 166–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307313177

[24] Jewitt, C., 2002. The move from page to screen: The multimodal reshaping of school English. Visual Communication. 1(2), 171–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100203

[25] Lemke, J., 2002. Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication. 1(3), 299–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100303

[26] Tan, S., O’Halloran, K.L., Wignell, P., et al., 2020. Images of austerity in the British press and in online media. In: Griebel, T., Evert, S., Heinrich, P. (Eds.). Multimodal approaches to media discourses: Reconstructing the age of austerity in the United Kingdom. Routledge: London, UK.

[27] Patton, M.Q., 2015. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and practice, 4th ed. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

[28] Sadallah, S.H., Halawachy, H., 2025. Multimodal efficacy of health warnings on UK cigarette packages: A cognitive-semiotic analysis. Journal of Ecohumanism. 4(1), 4724–4742. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6376

[29] Zhao, M., Lyu, Z., Cheng, Q., et al., 2020. Tobacco control intervention: A comparative multimodal discourse analysis of video advertisements in China and Australia. English Language Teaching. 13(4), 314–323.

[30] Saudi Ministry of Health, 2019. Global adult tobacco survey. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Population-Health-Indicators/Documents/KSA_GATS_2019_FactSheet.pdf (cited 24 June 2025).

[31] Ainiwaer, A., Zhang, S., Ainiwaer, X., et al., 2021. Effects of message framing on cancer prevention and detection behaviors, intentions, and attitudes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(9), e27634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/27634

[32] Niederdeppe, J., Bu, Q.L., Borah, P., et al., 2008. Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities. Milbank Quarterly. 86(3), 481–513.

[33] Peregrin, T., 2010. Picture this: Visual cues enhance health education messages for people with low literacy skills. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 110(Suppl. 1), S28–S32.

[34] Guolla, M., Belch, G.E., Belch, M.A., 2017. Advertising and promotion: An integrated marketing communications perspective, 6th ed. McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA.

[35] Jovanović, P., Vlastelica, T., Cicvarić Kostić, S., et al., 2016. Impact of advertising appeals on purchase intention. Management. 21(2), 33–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2016.0025

[36] Huang, M., Liu, T., 2021. Subjective or objective? How the style of text in computational advertising influences consumer behaviors. Fundamental Research. 2, 144153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.004

[37] Adebare, A., Nash, J., 2025. A comparative analysis of advertising appeals in anti-smoking advertisements (print and online display ads) from the 1990s to 2020s in the U.K. Journal of Applied Marketing Theory. 12(1), 99–123. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20429/jamt.2025.120106

Downloads

How to Cite

Almalki, D. (2025). Cross-Cultural Persuasive Strategies in Saudi and British Anti-Smoking Advertisements: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(12), 1462–1475. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i12.11857

Issue

Vol. 7 , Iss. 12 (December 2025): In progress

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2025 Darene Almalki

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License.