Facework display of a political leader: Linguo-rhetoric approach (the case study of Julia Gillard's speech on misogyny)

Authors

  • Anna Lyashuk

    Educational and Scientific Institute of Philology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv; Department of English and Linguistics, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i1.1996

Abstract

This article focuses on the cognitive rhetoric features of the politician's facework that incorporate face threatening acts, communicative strategies, and discursive functions in a political speech. The data were taken from the speech on misogyny delivered in 2012 by the 27th Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard. Throughout the article we disclose the interaction of the politician's face, politeness, and power in the institutional discourse. Julia Gillard does her facework actively engaged into the misogyny argument which provides a persuasive ground to confront the opponent's face through reinforced employment of both positive and negative face threatening acts. The findings suggest that doing facework through rhetorical practices Gillard signals her identity in three faces: a political leader, a female politician and her individual social self-image of a woman and daughter. Gillard's face claims are closely bound with her sense of sociality rights and obligations. This entails her relational and collective self-construal prevail over her individual face. The symbolic power obliges Gillard to protect her collective self-credibility and makes the ground for undermining the self-worth of the opponent in a rather straightforward manner. The politeness Gillard exercises is mainly prescribed by the institutional goal and status which directly impact the use of the linguistic means employed by the politician.

Keywords:

political discourse, strategies, politician, facework, face threatening acts, sociolinguistic markers, misogyny, Gillard, political speech

References

[1] Arundale, R. (2009). Face as emergent in interpersonal communication: an alternative to Goffman. In: Bargiela-Chiappini F, Haugh M (editors). Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox. pp. 33–54.

[2] Austin JL. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.

[3] Baider, F. H., Cislaru, G., Claudel, C. (2020). Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back. Corpus Pragmatics, 4(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-020-00088-8

[4] Bianchi, C. (2013). Implicating. In: Pragmatics of Speech Actions, 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214383.107

[5] Brown, P, Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 56–289.

[6] Burke, K. (1925). Psychology and Form. The Dial 79 (July), 34–46.

[7] Chang, W. L. M., Haugh, M. (2011). Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 2948–2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009

[8] Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3

[9] Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511975752

[10] Culpeper, J., Haugh, M. (2014). Pragmatics and the English Language. Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-39391-3

[11] Culpeper, J., Terkourafi, M. (2017). Pragmatic Approaches (Im)politeness. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_2

[12] van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is Political Discourse Analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11, 11–52. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.11.03dij

[13] Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

[14] Goffman, E. (1955). On Face-Work. Psychiatry, 18(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008

[15] Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

[16] Haugh, M. (2013). Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Pragmática Sociocultural/Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1515/soprag-2012-0005

[17] HARRIS, S. (2001). Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 12(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003

[18] Holmes, J. (1992). Women’s Talk in Public Contexts. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002001

[19] House, J. (2010). Impoliteness in Germany: Intercultural encounters in everyday and institutional talk. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.026

[20] Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

[21] Locher, M. A., Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

[22] Locher, M. A. (2008). Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In: Handbook of Interpersonal Communication. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany. pp. 509–540. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211399.4.509

[23] Locher, M. A. (2012). Politeness research from past to future, with a special focus on the discursive approach. In: Fernández Amaya, L., Hernández López, M., Gómez Morón, R., et al. (editors). New Perspectives on (Im)politeness and Interpersonal Communication. Cambridge Scholars, Cambridge, England. pp. 36–60.

[24] O’Driscoll, J. (2017). Face and (Im)politeness. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_5

[25] Oakley, T. (2020). What’s Cognitive about Rhetoric? In: Rhetorical Minds. Meditations on the Cognitive Science of Persuasion. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1tbhqr2

[26] Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173438

[27] Searle, J. R. (1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In: Gunderson K. (editor). Language, mind, and knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

[28] Sifianou, M., Tzanne, A. (2021). Face, Facework and Face-Threatening Acts. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.015

[29] Slavova, L. (2020). Discursive Strategies of Politicians through the Prism of Translation. In: Translation and Power. Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften: Berlin; Bern; Wien. pp. 297–303.

[30] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004

[31] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In: Spencer-Oatey, H. (editor). Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, 2nd ed. London: Continuum. pp. 11–47.

[32] Spencer-Oatey, H. (2009). Face, identity and interactional goals. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Haugh, M. (editors). Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox. pp. 137–54.

[33] Spencer-Oatey, H., Wang, J. (2019). Culture, Context, and Concerns About Face: Synergistic Insights From Pragmatics and Social Psychology. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x19865293

[34] Terkourafi, M. (2008). Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In: Impoliteness in Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344.1.45

[35] Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk: language and interaction in institutional discourse. Harlow: Longman.

[36] The Sydney Morning Herald (2012). Transcript of Julia Gillard’s speech. Available online: https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/transcript-of-julia-gillards-speech-20121010-27c36.html (accessed on 11 September 2023).

[37] Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In: Gudykunst, W. B. (editor). Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 71–91.

[38] Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness: Facework and linguistic politeness. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511615184

Downloads

Issue

Vol. 6 , Iss. 1 (March 2024)

Article Type

Article

License

Copyright © 2024 Anna Lyashuk

Creative Commons License

This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.