Natalia Srebryanskaya
Department of English, Voronezh State Pedagogical University
Valentina Gurchenko
International Cooperation Department, Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies Named after G.F. Morozov
Irina Bakhmetieva
Department of English, Voronezh State Pedagogical University
The issues of performativity of the English educational discourse (EED) are considered. Under the educational discourse, the authors understand the educator's statements to the educatees in order to make an educational impact on them. The aim of the study is to define the types and characteristics of performative verbs in the English educational discourse. The authors suggest that performativity can become one of the important characteristics of educational discourse. The data for this study were collected from the English-language fiction of the 19th–21st centuries, devoted to the problems of education and upbringing. Attention is paid to performative verbs as the basis of EED. The classifications of Austin, Searle and Apresyan are taken as starting points. The results of the analysis show that performative verbs are typical of the EED, but their activity and frequency vary. The performativity of a verb depends on its position in the sentence. In some positions in the sentence, they may lose their illocutionary power and the ability to carry out an action; in this case, they are used in the phatic function. The analysis shows that the EED has a high degree of performativity, which can be considered a characteristic feature of the discourse under study.
Álvarez EL (2005). Performative speech act verbs in present day English. Interlingüística 16(2): 685–702.
Andriianova MV (2023). Verbal and non-verbal invective in pedagogic discourse. Human in the Modern World 1: 97–100. doi: 10.18137/RNU.V925X.23.01.P.097
Apresyan YD (1995). Performatives in grammar and dictionary. In: Apresyan YD (editor). Selected Works. School of Languages of Russian Culture. pp. 199–218.
Arutyunova ND (1976). The Proposal and Its Meaning (Czech). Nauka.
Austen J (2004). Sense and Sensibility. Oxford University Press.
Austen J (2017). Northanger Abbey. Canterbury Classics.
Austin JL (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.
Austin JL (1986). Word as action. New in Foreign Linguistics 17: 22–129.
Bronte C (2006). Jane Eyre. Penguin Classics.
Chetyrkina IV (2006). Performativity of Speech Practices as A Constitutive Sign of Culture: Ethnic and Historical Perspective [PhD thesis]. Kuban State University.
Chouliaraki L (1998). Regulation in ‘progressivist’ pedagogic discourse: Individualized teacher-pupil talk. Discourse and Society 9(1): 5–32. doi: 10.1177/0957926598009001001
Cohen PR, Levesque HJ (1990). Performatives in a rationally based dpeech sct theory. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 6–9 June 1990; Pittsburgh, USA. pp. 79–88.
Fairclough N (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman.
Formanovskaya NI (2007). Speech Interaction: Communication and Pragmatics. Ikar Publishing House.
Gaskell E (2012). Wives and Daughters. Simon and Schuster.
Gurchenko VI (2019). Using the techniques of predicative phatic communication in the English-language female educational discourse. Izvestia VSPU 3: 118–123.
Harris J (2003). Blackberry Wine. William Morrow Paperbacks.
Harris J (2006). Gentlemen and Players. Black Swan.
Hlebec B (2015). Lexical definitions of some performative verbs. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 50(1): 27–44. doi: 10.1515/stap-2015-0015
Ilyinova EY, Tsinkerman TN (2019). Pragmatics of communicative tonality in the style of the English-language educational dialogue. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije 18(1): 146–158. doi: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2019.1.12
Karasik VI (1991). The Language of Social Status. Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Karasik VI (2002). Linguistic Circle: Personality, Concepts, Discourse. Peremena.
Karasik VI (2007). Language Keys: Monograph. Paradigm.
Kaufman B (2019). Up the Down Staircase. Vintage.
Kodelja Z (2023). Slogans as an integral part of educational discourse: Two examples. Policy Futures in Education. doi: 10.1177/14782103231166052
Kryukova IV (2009). Performative utterance and performative verb. Bulletin of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Social and Humanitarian Sciences 4(9): 52–54.
Mabaquiao Jr. MN (2018). Speech act theory: From Austin to Searle. Augustinian: A Journal for Humanities, Social Sciences, Business, and Education 19(1): 35–45.
Matveeva GG, Sakharova EE (2010). Discourse of church preaching as a performative action. Language and Culture. Scientific Peer Reviewed Journal 4: 65–66.
Mita AM (2019). The meaning of performative verbs in English movies. Elite Journal 6(1): 70–80.
Plungian V, Rakhilina E, Reznikova T (2022). Perfective, performative and present: Some non-standard combinations in Slavic and beyond. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26(4): 1012–1030. doi: 10.22363/2687-0088-31252
Searle JR (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 1–23.
Srebryanskaya NA, Uvarova ES (2019). Specificity of communication styles between the teacher and the pupil. Izvestiya VSPU 2: 253–256.
Travers PL (2008). Mary Poppins. HarperCollins.
Truba HM (2022). Definition of the concept of educational network discourse: Definitions of the concepts of “educational discourse”, “scientific discourse” and “education network discourse”. Opera in Linguistica Ukrainiana 360–368. doi: 10.18524/2414-0627.2022.29.262420
Tsinkerman TN (2014). Linguopragmatic Specificity of Communication Styles in the English-language Educational Discourse [PhD thesis]. Volgograd State University.
Wiemer B (2014). The use of the perfect aspect in performative present tense. Acta linguistica Petropolitana 10(3): 91–113.
Wierzbicka A (1987). English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Academic Press.
Wilde O (2019). The Importance of Being Earnest. CreateSpace.
Xing W (2014). The construction of the teacher’s authority in pedagogic discourse. English Language Teaching 7(6): 96–108. doi: 10.5539/elt.v7n6p96
Copyright © 2023 Natalia Srebryanskaya, Valentina Gurchenko, Irina Bakhmetieva
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
