Yi Tie
Zhengzhou University
This research investigates the diachronic variation of the source domains in Chinese LIFE metaphor. Close examination of data from historical corpora has revealed that the source domain types evolve gradual diversified changes based on the social material and cultural life. Specifically, the results show that (1) harsh living environment and farming understanding account for Chinese ancestors' preference for crops as the source domain in their life metaphors, (2) the territory extension and duplicate metaphysics together give reasons why the Tang Chinese favor transportation as well as natural phenomenon as the source domains in their life metaphors, (3) the increasing material enrichment and cultural diversification of modern times provide experiential motivation of the gamut of source domain types in Mandarin life metaphors. Thus, a conclusion can be reached that metaphor variation reflects social material level and intellectual level throughout the ages.
Ding Y (2004) A comparative study on Chinese and western metaphors (in Chinese). Academic Exchange (12): 159–161.
Feng Y (2013) A Brief History of Chinese Philosophy (in Chinese). Beijing: World Book Inc.
Ge Z (2015) History of Chinese Thoughts Vol. I (in Chinese). Shanghai: Fudan University Press.
Guo Y (1998) The cultural influence on language from the perspective of metaphorical variation (in Chinese). Journal of Central China Normal University (9): 88–92.
Kövecses Z (2005) Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. New York: Cambeidge University Press.
Kövecses Z (2006) Embodiment, experiential focus, and diachronic change in metaphor. In: McConchie RW, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX). MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp.1–7.
Kövecses Z (2015) Where Metaphors Come From. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff G and Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Legges J (1891) The Sacred Books of China. The Texts of Taoism, Part I. London: Clarendon Press.
Li F (2015) Leonard Talmy’s thoughts of linguistic philosophy (in Chinese). Foreign Languages in China 12(6): 41–47.
Li X (2007) Metaphorical thinking and cognition in Chinese and western culture (in Chinese). Jiangsu Social Sciences (1): 214–217.
Liu G (2007) On the characteristics of Taoism of duplicate metaphysics in the Tang Dynasty (in Chinese). Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (2): 68–72.
Qin X and Huang X (2014) The cognitive motivations for the diversity of the source domains from the embodied cognitive perspective—A case study on the metaphorical concept of “sorrow” in certain Chinese poems (in Chinese). Foreign Languages and Their Teaching (5): 24–29.
Tie Y (2016) Experience, metaphor, and life—A cognitive study on the multi-sources mechanism of life metaphor in modern Chinese (in Chinese). Journal of Changchun University 26(5): 54–58.
Wang R (trans) (2008) The Book of Poetry. Changsha: Hunan People’s Publishing House.
Wang S (2009) A Multi-dimensional Study of Metaphor (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University.
Wang Y (2006) Cognitive Linguistics (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Xu Y (trans) (2008) 300 Tang Poems. Beijing: China Translation & Publishing Corporation.
Yu N (2008) The relationship between metaphor, body and culture. In: Frank RM, et al. (eds) Body, Language and Mind (Volume 2: Sociocultural Situatedness). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.387–407.
Yu N and Jia D (2016) Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 27(2): 1–33.
Zhang Z (2012) A diachronic study on TIME metaphor (in Chinese). Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages 35(5): 10–15.
Copyright © 2021 Yi Tie
This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
