Translating metaphors in Chinese satirical literature: A foreignization approach

Authors

  • Dandan Tian

    Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Ling Yann Wong

    Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

  • Muhammad Alif Redzuan bin Abdullah

    Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1187

Abstract

The paper delves into the complexities of translating metaphors in Chinese satirical literature, emphasizing the cultural and linguistic nuances involved. It highlights the importance of metaphors in expressing satire and the challenges posed by cultural differences between Chinese and English. The paper advocates for a foreignization translation approach to preserve the original's cultural essence and satirical tone, balancing it with explanations to aid understanding in the target language. This method ensures the retention of literary value while facilitating cross-cultural dialogue and appreciation of the source culture's literary aesthetics.

Keywords:

translating metaphors; Chinese satirical literature; cultural nuances; linguistic challenges; foreignization translation approach; cross-cultural dialogue

References

Barnden, J. (2021). Metaphor and irony. Figurative Thought and Language, 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.11.05bar

Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2016). Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. Communication Theory, 26(4), 410–430. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12096

Declercq, D. (2021). Writing Against the State: Political Rhetorics in Third and Fourth Century China. 39.

Ebrahimi, M., & Sepora Tengku Mahadi, T. (2020). Domestication and Foreignization in Key Cultural Text Translation: A Case Study of the English Translation of Lost in the Crowd. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijclts.v.8n.2p.1

Forster, M. N. (2023). Foreignizing Translation and Chinese. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 50(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1163/15406253-12340109

Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Researching metaphor. Researching and Applying Metaphor, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139524704.005

Kuleli, M. (2020). Culture specific items in literary texts and their translation based on “foreignization” and “domestication” strategies (Turkish). RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (Ö7), pp. 617-653.

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.

Lilia, M. (2023). Investigating domestication and foreignization in literary Translation [PhD thesis]. Kasdi Merbah Ouargla University.

Li, N. (2021). Study on the Influential Analysis of Cultural Context in English-Chinese Translation. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9(4), 201. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20210904.19

Li, H. (2022). A Study of the Translation of Mo Yan’s Frog From the Perspective of Domestication and Foreignization. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(7), 1405–1409. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.21

Luo, M. (2021). Domestication and Foreignization of English-Chinese Translation in the Context of Cross-cultural Communication. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 4(3), 80-84.

Longxi, Z. (2022). Chinese Literature, Translation, and World Literature. The Making of Chinese-Sinophone Literatures as World Literature, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888528721.003.0002

Poeppel, D., & Assaneo, M. F. (2020). Speech rhythms and their neural foundations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(6), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0304-4

Pym, A. (2020). Literary Translation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.1107

Su, K. (2022). Contextualized Study of History of Czech Literature in Chinese Translation: 1921-2020.

Steen, G. (2014). The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics, 117-142.

Tian, M. (2023). Research on the Application of Domestication and Foreignization in Literary Translation. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 9(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v9i1.9364

Wilson, D. (2011). Parallels and differences in the treatment of metaphor in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.009

Yin, Y. (2023). The Application of Domestication and Foreignization in English-Chinese Translations of Children’s Literature: A Case Study of the Secret Garden. (2023). Lecture Notes on Language and Literature, 6(15). https://doi.org/10.23977/langl.2023.061520

Downloads

How to Cite

Tian, D., Wong, L. Y., & bin Abdullah, M. A. R. (2024). Translating metaphors in Chinese satirical literature: A foreignization approach. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1187

Issue

Article Type

Article